Cargando…

A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficiency and toxicity of bevacizumab by intrapleural or intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Sensitizing mutation negative NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion were ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nie, Keke, Zhang, Zhen, You, Yunhong, Zhuang, Xingjun, Zhang, Chunling, Ji, Youxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31726490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13238
_version_ 1783484087583899648
author Nie, Keke
Zhang, Zhen
You, Yunhong
Zhuang, Xingjun
Zhang, Chunling
Ji, Youxin
author_facet Nie, Keke
Zhang, Zhen
You, Yunhong
Zhuang, Xingjun
Zhang, Chunling
Ji, Youxin
author_sort Nie, Keke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the efficiency and toxicity of bevacizumab by intrapleural or intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Sensitizing mutation negative NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion were randomized into two groups in 1:1 ratio. The pleural effusion was completely drained in 24 hours; one group received intrapleural infusion and the second group received intravenous infusion of bevacizumab at a dose of 7.5 mg per kg bodyweight. The serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was tested before and 72 hours after injection of bevacizumab. Computerized tomography (CT) scan to evaluate pleural effusions was carried out at four weeks for each patient and their survival followed‐up. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were screened and 43 enrolled into the study. The response rate was 80% (16 of 20) in the intrapleural group and 66.7% (14 of 21) in the intravenous group. The median duration of response (DoR) of pleural effusion was 4.50 months and 3.70 months, respectively. The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 67.25% in the intrapleural group and 57.19% in the intravenous group compared to baseline level (P = 0.276). The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 52.02% compared to baseline level in patients’ DoR less than three months and 68.33% in patients' DoR longer than three months, respectively (P = 0.014). The main side effects noted were mild to moderate hypertension, proteinuria and epistaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab intrapleural infusion had higher efficiency and higher safety than intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion caused by NSCLC. The decreased level of serum VEGF at 72 hours after bevacizumab treatment was closely related to the response rate and duration of the response of pleural effusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69387442020-01-06 A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer Nie, Keke Zhang, Zhen You, Yunhong Zhuang, Xingjun Zhang, Chunling Ji, Youxin Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: To compare the efficiency and toxicity of bevacizumab by intrapleural or intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Sensitizing mutation negative NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion were randomized into two groups in 1:1 ratio. The pleural effusion was completely drained in 24 hours; one group received intrapleural infusion and the second group received intravenous infusion of bevacizumab at a dose of 7.5 mg per kg bodyweight. The serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was tested before and 72 hours after injection of bevacizumab. Computerized tomography (CT) scan to evaluate pleural effusions was carried out at four weeks for each patient and their survival followed‐up. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were screened and 43 enrolled into the study. The response rate was 80% (16 of 20) in the intrapleural group and 66.7% (14 of 21) in the intravenous group. The median duration of response (DoR) of pleural effusion was 4.50 months and 3.70 months, respectively. The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 67.25% in the intrapleural group and 57.19% in the intravenous group compared to baseline level (P = 0.276). The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 52.02% compared to baseline level in patients’ DoR less than three months and 68.33% in patients' DoR longer than three months, respectively (P = 0.014). The main side effects noted were mild to moderate hypertension, proteinuria and epistaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab intrapleural infusion had higher efficiency and higher safety than intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion caused by NSCLC. The decreased level of serum VEGF at 72 hours after bevacizumab treatment was closely related to the response rate and duration of the response of pleural effusion. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-11-14 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6938744/ /pubmed/31726490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13238 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nie, Keke
Zhang, Zhen
You, Yunhong
Zhuang, Xingjun
Zhang, Chunling
Ji, Youxin
A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_full A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_fullStr A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_short A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_sort randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31726490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13238
work_keys_str_mv AT niekeke arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhangzhen arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT youyunhong arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhuangxingjun arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhangchunling arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT jiyouxin arandomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT niekeke randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhangzhen randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT youyunhong randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhuangxingjun randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhangchunling randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT jiyouxin randomizedclinicalstudytocompareintrapleuralinfusionwithintravenousinfusionofbevacizumabinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancer