Cargando…

Conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors()

BACKGROUND: Conflict of interest as it relates to medical education is a burgeoning topic of concern. Dermatology textbooks are an influential resource for dermatologists. This study evaluates industry payments to authors of major dermatology textbooks. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roman, Jorge, Elpern, David J., Zampella, John G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31909159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.08.003
_version_ 1783484109176176640
author Roman, Jorge
Elpern, David J.
Zampella, John G.
author_facet Roman, Jorge
Elpern, David J.
Zampella, John G.
author_sort Roman, Jorge
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conflict of interest as it relates to medical education is a burgeoning topic of concern. Dermatology textbooks are an influential resource for dermatologists. This study evaluates industry payments to authors of major dermatology textbooks. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether authors of dermatology textbooks had appreciable conflicts of interest in the form of payments from industry. METHODS: This is a retrospective study in which the authors and editors of eight commonly used general dermatology textbooks were entered into the ProPublica Dollars for Docs database to identify industry payments data from 2016. RESULTS: The total compensation for 381 authors in 2016 was $5,892,221. Zero payments were reported for 39.6% of authors. Of the dermatologists, 50%, 66%, 70%, and 81% received less than $100, $500, $1000, and $5000, respectively. The top 10% of dermatologists who collected payments received $5,267,494, which represented 89% of the total payment amount. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited to eight textbooks. Data are only as accurate as reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The database does not include information on dermatologists from non-U.S. institutions. Funding for clinical trials and other avenues of support (e.g., lasers, cosmetic instruments, institutional payments) are also not captured in this database. CONCLUSION: A minority of authors of influential dermatology textbooks received the lion’s share of payments from industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69388262020-01-06 Conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors() Roman, Jorge Elpern, David J. Zampella, John G. Int J Womens Dermatol Article BACKGROUND: Conflict of interest as it relates to medical education is a burgeoning topic of concern. Dermatology textbooks are an influential resource for dermatologists. This study evaluates industry payments to authors of major dermatology textbooks. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether authors of dermatology textbooks had appreciable conflicts of interest in the form of payments from industry. METHODS: This is a retrospective study in which the authors and editors of eight commonly used general dermatology textbooks were entered into the ProPublica Dollars for Docs database to identify industry payments data from 2016. RESULTS: The total compensation for 381 authors in 2016 was $5,892,221. Zero payments were reported for 39.6% of authors. Of the dermatologists, 50%, 66%, 70%, and 81% received less than $100, $500, $1000, and $5000, respectively. The top 10% of dermatologists who collected payments received $5,267,494, which represented 89% of the total payment amount. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited to eight textbooks. Data are only as accurate as reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The database does not include information on dermatologists from non-U.S. institutions. Funding for clinical trials and other avenues of support (e.g., lasers, cosmetic instruments, institutional payments) are also not captured in this database. CONCLUSION: A minority of authors of influential dermatology textbooks received the lion’s share of payments from industry. Elsevier 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6938826/ /pubmed/31909159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.08.003 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Roman, Jorge
Elpern, David J.
Zampella, John G.
Conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors()
title Conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors()
title_full Conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors()
title_fullStr Conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors()
title_full_unstemmed Conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors()
title_short Conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors()
title_sort conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31909159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.08.003
work_keys_str_mv AT romanjorge conflictsofinterestamongdermatologytextbookauthors
AT elperndavidj conflictsofinterestamongdermatologytextbookauthors
AT zampellajohng conflictsofinterestamongdermatologytextbookauthors