Cargando…

An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population

The exact dimensions of the scapula, including the coracoid process and glenoid fossa, are fundamental in the patho-mechanics of the glenohumeral joint (GHJ); as these structures act as initiators of shoulder movement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the anthropometric parameters of the GHJ, wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, R., Satyapal, K.S., Lazarus, L., Naidoo, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31909271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03107
_version_ 1783484120301568000
author Khan, R.
Satyapal, K.S.
Lazarus, L.
Naidoo, N.
author_facet Khan, R.
Satyapal, K.S.
Lazarus, L.
Naidoo, N.
author_sort Khan, R.
collection PubMed
description The exact dimensions of the scapula, including the coracoid process and glenoid fossa, are fundamental in the patho-mechanics of the glenohumeral joint (GHJ); as these structures act as initiators of shoulder movement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the anthropometric parameters of the GHJ, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa. The morphometric (Linear Tools 2012, 0–150mm, LIN 86500963) and morphological parameters of a total of one hundred and sixty-four (n = 164) dry bone scapulae [Right (R): 80; Left (L): 84, Male (M): 68; Female (F): 96] were recorded. Results: (i) Shape of glenoid fossa: Type 1: (R) 16.5%, (L) 11.0%; Male (M) 20.1%, Female (F) 7.3%; Type 2: (R) 14.0%, (L) 15.2%; (M) 18.3%, (F) 11.0%; Type 3: (R) 18.3%, (L) 25.0%; (M) 27.4%, (F) 15.9%. (ii) Notch type: Type 1: (R) 1.7%, (L) 7.3%; (M) 6.7%, (F) 2.4%; Type 2: (R) 47.0%, (L) 43.9%; (M) 59.2%, (F) 31.7%. (iii) Vertical diameter of glenoid fossa (VD) (mm): (R) 35.2 ± 3.1, (L) 34.9 ± 3.0; (M) 35.3 ± 3.2, (F) 34.6 ± 2.8. (iv) Horizontal diameter 1 (HD1) of glenoid fossa (mm): (R) 18.4 ± 3.3, (L) 17.5 ± 2.9; (M) 18.2 ± 3.3, (F) 17.4 ± 2.6. (v) Horizontal diameter 2 (HD2) of glenoid fossa (mm): (R) 24.5 ± 2.9, (L) 23.6 ± 2.6; (M) 24.2 ± 2.7, (F) 23.7 ± 2.8. (vi) Length of coracoid process (CL) (mm): (R) 41.7 ± 4.7, (L) 41.5 ± 4.9; (M) 42.1 ± 4.7, (F) 40.7 ± 4.8. (vii) Width of coracoid process (CW) (mm): (R) 13.3 ± 1.9, (L) 14.2 ± 11.9; (M) 13.1 ± 1.9, (F) 15.1 ± 14.5. (viii) Coracoglenoid distance (CGD) (mm): (R) 27.4 ± 8.3, (L) 28.2 ± 3.5; (M) 28.2 ± 7.4, (F) 27.0 ± 3.4. In the present study, Type 3 (oval) was observed to be the predominant glenoid fossa shape with a higher incidence in male individuals and on the right side. Although only notch Types 1 (without a notch) and 2 (with one notch) were observed in this study, Type 2 (one notch) was the most prevalent, presenting with a significant p-value (p = 0.019), suggesting that notch Type 1 (without a notch) and 2 (with one notch) are common findings in the right and left side of individuals. The findings observed in this study may provide knowledge regarding the role of the coracoid parameters in etiology of subcoracoid impingement while knowledge on the glenoid fossa parameters and variations are essential for evaluation in shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid fractures and anterior dislocations, and for glenoid prosthesis designs for the South African population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69388782020-01-06 An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population Khan, R. Satyapal, K.S. Lazarus, L. Naidoo, N. Heliyon Article The exact dimensions of the scapula, including the coracoid process and glenoid fossa, are fundamental in the patho-mechanics of the glenohumeral joint (GHJ); as these structures act as initiators of shoulder movement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the anthropometric parameters of the GHJ, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa. The morphometric (Linear Tools 2012, 0–150mm, LIN 86500963) and morphological parameters of a total of one hundred and sixty-four (n = 164) dry bone scapulae [Right (R): 80; Left (L): 84, Male (M): 68; Female (F): 96] were recorded. Results: (i) Shape of glenoid fossa: Type 1: (R) 16.5%, (L) 11.0%; Male (M) 20.1%, Female (F) 7.3%; Type 2: (R) 14.0%, (L) 15.2%; (M) 18.3%, (F) 11.0%; Type 3: (R) 18.3%, (L) 25.0%; (M) 27.4%, (F) 15.9%. (ii) Notch type: Type 1: (R) 1.7%, (L) 7.3%; (M) 6.7%, (F) 2.4%; Type 2: (R) 47.0%, (L) 43.9%; (M) 59.2%, (F) 31.7%. (iii) Vertical diameter of glenoid fossa (VD) (mm): (R) 35.2 ± 3.1, (L) 34.9 ± 3.0; (M) 35.3 ± 3.2, (F) 34.6 ± 2.8. (iv) Horizontal diameter 1 (HD1) of glenoid fossa (mm): (R) 18.4 ± 3.3, (L) 17.5 ± 2.9; (M) 18.2 ± 3.3, (F) 17.4 ± 2.6. (v) Horizontal diameter 2 (HD2) of glenoid fossa (mm): (R) 24.5 ± 2.9, (L) 23.6 ± 2.6; (M) 24.2 ± 2.7, (F) 23.7 ± 2.8. (vi) Length of coracoid process (CL) (mm): (R) 41.7 ± 4.7, (L) 41.5 ± 4.9; (M) 42.1 ± 4.7, (F) 40.7 ± 4.8. (vii) Width of coracoid process (CW) (mm): (R) 13.3 ± 1.9, (L) 14.2 ± 11.9; (M) 13.1 ± 1.9, (F) 15.1 ± 14.5. (viii) Coracoglenoid distance (CGD) (mm): (R) 27.4 ± 8.3, (L) 28.2 ± 3.5; (M) 28.2 ± 7.4, (F) 27.0 ± 3.4. In the present study, Type 3 (oval) was observed to be the predominant glenoid fossa shape with a higher incidence in male individuals and on the right side. Although only notch Types 1 (without a notch) and 2 (with one notch) were observed in this study, Type 2 (one notch) was the most prevalent, presenting with a significant p-value (p = 0.019), suggesting that notch Type 1 (without a notch) and 2 (with one notch) are common findings in the right and left side of individuals. The findings observed in this study may provide knowledge regarding the role of the coracoid parameters in etiology of subcoracoid impingement while knowledge on the glenoid fossa parameters and variations are essential for evaluation in shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid fractures and anterior dislocations, and for glenoid prosthesis designs for the South African population. Elsevier 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6938878/ /pubmed/31909271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03107 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Khan, R.
Satyapal, K.S.
Lazarus, L.
Naidoo, N.
An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population
title An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population
title_full An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population
title_fullStr An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population
title_full_unstemmed An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population
title_short An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population
title_sort anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a south african population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31909271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03107
work_keys_str_mv AT khanr ananthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation
AT satyapalks ananthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation
AT lazarusl ananthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation
AT naidoon ananthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation
AT khanr anthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation
AT satyapalks anthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation
AT lazarusl anthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation
AT naidoon anthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation