Cargando…
An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population
The exact dimensions of the scapula, including the coracoid process and glenoid fossa, are fundamental in the patho-mechanics of the glenohumeral joint (GHJ); as these structures act as initiators of shoulder movement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the anthropometric parameters of the GHJ, wi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31909271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03107 |
_version_ | 1783484120301568000 |
---|---|
author | Khan, R. Satyapal, K.S. Lazarus, L. Naidoo, N. |
author_facet | Khan, R. Satyapal, K.S. Lazarus, L. Naidoo, N. |
author_sort | Khan, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The exact dimensions of the scapula, including the coracoid process and glenoid fossa, are fundamental in the patho-mechanics of the glenohumeral joint (GHJ); as these structures act as initiators of shoulder movement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the anthropometric parameters of the GHJ, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa. The morphometric (Linear Tools 2012, 0–150mm, LIN 86500963) and morphological parameters of a total of one hundred and sixty-four (n = 164) dry bone scapulae [Right (R): 80; Left (L): 84, Male (M): 68; Female (F): 96] were recorded. Results: (i) Shape of glenoid fossa: Type 1: (R) 16.5%, (L) 11.0%; Male (M) 20.1%, Female (F) 7.3%; Type 2: (R) 14.0%, (L) 15.2%; (M) 18.3%, (F) 11.0%; Type 3: (R) 18.3%, (L) 25.0%; (M) 27.4%, (F) 15.9%. (ii) Notch type: Type 1: (R) 1.7%, (L) 7.3%; (M) 6.7%, (F) 2.4%; Type 2: (R) 47.0%, (L) 43.9%; (M) 59.2%, (F) 31.7%. (iii) Vertical diameter of glenoid fossa (VD) (mm): (R) 35.2 ± 3.1, (L) 34.9 ± 3.0; (M) 35.3 ± 3.2, (F) 34.6 ± 2.8. (iv) Horizontal diameter 1 (HD1) of glenoid fossa (mm): (R) 18.4 ± 3.3, (L) 17.5 ± 2.9; (M) 18.2 ± 3.3, (F) 17.4 ± 2.6. (v) Horizontal diameter 2 (HD2) of glenoid fossa (mm): (R) 24.5 ± 2.9, (L) 23.6 ± 2.6; (M) 24.2 ± 2.7, (F) 23.7 ± 2.8. (vi) Length of coracoid process (CL) (mm): (R) 41.7 ± 4.7, (L) 41.5 ± 4.9; (M) 42.1 ± 4.7, (F) 40.7 ± 4.8. (vii) Width of coracoid process (CW) (mm): (R) 13.3 ± 1.9, (L) 14.2 ± 11.9; (M) 13.1 ± 1.9, (F) 15.1 ± 14.5. (viii) Coracoglenoid distance (CGD) (mm): (R) 27.4 ± 8.3, (L) 28.2 ± 3.5; (M) 28.2 ± 7.4, (F) 27.0 ± 3.4. In the present study, Type 3 (oval) was observed to be the predominant glenoid fossa shape with a higher incidence in male individuals and on the right side. Although only notch Types 1 (without a notch) and 2 (with one notch) were observed in this study, Type 2 (one notch) was the most prevalent, presenting with a significant p-value (p = 0.019), suggesting that notch Type 1 (without a notch) and 2 (with one notch) are common findings in the right and left side of individuals. The findings observed in this study may provide knowledge regarding the role of the coracoid parameters in etiology of subcoracoid impingement while knowledge on the glenoid fossa parameters and variations are essential for evaluation in shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid fractures and anterior dislocations, and for glenoid prosthesis designs for the South African population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6938878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69388782020-01-06 An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population Khan, R. Satyapal, K.S. Lazarus, L. Naidoo, N. Heliyon Article The exact dimensions of the scapula, including the coracoid process and glenoid fossa, are fundamental in the patho-mechanics of the glenohumeral joint (GHJ); as these structures act as initiators of shoulder movement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the anthropometric parameters of the GHJ, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa. The morphometric (Linear Tools 2012, 0–150mm, LIN 86500963) and morphological parameters of a total of one hundred and sixty-four (n = 164) dry bone scapulae [Right (R): 80; Left (L): 84, Male (M): 68; Female (F): 96] were recorded. Results: (i) Shape of glenoid fossa: Type 1: (R) 16.5%, (L) 11.0%; Male (M) 20.1%, Female (F) 7.3%; Type 2: (R) 14.0%, (L) 15.2%; (M) 18.3%, (F) 11.0%; Type 3: (R) 18.3%, (L) 25.0%; (M) 27.4%, (F) 15.9%. (ii) Notch type: Type 1: (R) 1.7%, (L) 7.3%; (M) 6.7%, (F) 2.4%; Type 2: (R) 47.0%, (L) 43.9%; (M) 59.2%, (F) 31.7%. (iii) Vertical diameter of glenoid fossa (VD) (mm): (R) 35.2 ± 3.1, (L) 34.9 ± 3.0; (M) 35.3 ± 3.2, (F) 34.6 ± 2.8. (iv) Horizontal diameter 1 (HD1) of glenoid fossa (mm): (R) 18.4 ± 3.3, (L) 17.5 ± 2.9; (M) 18.2 ± 3.3, (F) 17.4 ± 2.6. (v) Horizontal diameter 2 (HD2) of glenoid fossa (mm): (R) 24.5 ± 2.9, (L) 23.6 ± 2.6; (M) 24.2 ± 2.7, (F) 23.7 ± 2.8. (vi) Length of coracoid process (CL) (mm): (R) 41.7 ± 4.7, (L) 41.5 ± 4.9; (M) 42.1 ± 4.7, (F) 40.7 ± 4.8. (vii) Width of coracoid process (CW) (mm): (R) 13.3 ± 1.9, (L) 14.2 ± 11.9; (M) 13.1 ± 1.9, (F) 15.1 ± 14.5. (viii) Coracoglenoid distance (CGD) (mm): (R) 27.4 ± 8.3, (L) 28.2 ± 3.5; (M) 28.2 ± 7.4, (F) 27.0 ± 3.4. In the present study, Type 3 (oval) was observed to be the predominant glenoid fossa shape with a higher incidence in male individuals and on the right side. Although only notch Types 1 (without a notch) and 2 (with one notch) were observed in this study, Type 2 (one notch) was the most prevalent, presenting with a significant p-value (p = 0.019), suggesting that notch Type 1 (without a notch) and 2 (with one notch) are common findings in the right and left side of individuals. The findings observed in this study may provide knowledge regarding the role of the coracoid parameters in etiology of subcoracoid impingement while knowledge on the glenoid fossa parameters and variations are essential for evaluation in shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid fractures and anterior dislocations, and for glenoid prosthesis designs for the South African population. Elsevier 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6938878/ /pubmed/31909271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03107 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Khan, R. Satyapal, K.S. Lazarus, L. Naidoo, N. An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population |
title | An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population |
title_full | An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population |
title_fullStr | An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population |
title_full_unstemmed | An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population |
title_short | An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population |
title_sort | anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a south african population |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31909271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanr ananthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation AT satyapalks ananthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation AT lazarusl ananthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation AT naidoon ananthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation AT khanr anthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation AT satyapalks anthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation AT lazarusl anthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation AT naidoon anthropometricevaluationofthescapulawithemphasisonthecoracoidprocessandglenoidfossainasouthafricanpopulation |