Cargando…

Double ulnar osteomy for the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the effects of our double osteotomy technique in the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation (CRHD). METHODS: A total 14 children (14 elbows; 71.42% male; mean age: 9.31 ± 3.06 years) with CRHD who underwent double osteotomy of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jie, Qiang, Liang, Xiaoju, Wang, Xiaowei, Wu, Yongtao, Wu, Ge, Wang, Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.08.010
_version_ 1783484145187422208
author Jie, Qiang
Liang, Xiaoju
Wang, Xiaowei
Wu, Yongtao
Wu, Ge
Wang, Bing
author_facet Jie, Qiang
Liang, Xiaoju
Wang, Xiaowei
Wu, Yongtao
Wu, Ge
Wang, Bing
author_sort Jie, Qiang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the effects of our double osteotomy technique in the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation (CRHD). METHODS: A total 14 children (14 elbows; 71.42% male; mean age: 9.31 ± 3.06 years) with CRHD who underwent double osteotomy of the proximal ulna between April 2010 and June 2015 were included in the study. The patients with CRHD were identified according to medical history, plain radiographs or magnetic resonance imagings. The outcomes were evaluated through comparison of the preoperative and postoperative motion range of elbow and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). RESULTS: After a follow-up of 13–35 months (22.29 ± 5.80), compared with pre-operation, the flexion (132.14 ± 3.23° vs 123.21 ± 7.75°, P = 0.003), extension (8.21 ± 4.21° vs 1.07 ± 3.50°, P = 0.003), and pronation of elbow (83.21 ± 4.21° vs 80.36 ± 4.14°, P = 0.011) improved significantly in all patients. Furthermore, the carrying angle was recovered to the normal level (5–15°) in all of these patients (18.57 ± 5.69° vs 8.21 ± 2.49°, P = 0.001). MEPS score was significantly increased postoperatively (96.79 ± 2.49 vs. 90.71 ± 1.82, P = 0.000), with the good outcome in CRHD patients. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggested that this double osteotomy on the proximal ulna might be an effective method for the treatment of CRHD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6938992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69389922020-01-06 Double ulnar osteomy for the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation Jie, Qiang Liang, Xiaoju Wang, Xiaowei Wu, Yongtao Wu, Ge Wang, Bing Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the effects of our double osteotomy technique in the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation (CRHD). METHODS: A total 14 children (14 elbows; 71.42% male; mean age: 9.31 ± 3.06 years) with CRHD who underwent double osteotomy of the proximal ulna between April 2010 and June 2015 were included in the study. The patients with CRHD were identified according to medical history, plain radiographs or magnetic resonance imagings. The outcomes were evaluated through comparison of the preoperative and postoperative motion range of elbow and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). RESULTS: After a follow-up of 13–35 months (22.29 ± 5.80), compared with pre-operation, the flexion (132.14 ± 3.23° vs 123.21 ± 7.75°, P = 0.003), extension (8.21 ± 4.21° vs 1.07 ± 3.50°, P = 0.003), and pronation of elbow (83.21 ± 4.21° vs 80.36 ± 4.14°, P = 0.011) improved significantly in all patients. Furthermore, the carrying angle was recovered to the normal level (5–15°) in all of these patients (18.57 ± 5.69° vs 8.21 ± 2.49°, P = 0.001). MEPS score was significantly increased postoperatively (96.79 ± 2.49 vs. 90.71 ± 1.82, P = 0.000), with the good outcome in CRHD patients. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggested that this double osteotomy on the proximal ulna might be an effective method for the treatment of CRHD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study. Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2019-11 2019-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6938992/ /pubmed/31540774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.08.010 Text en © 2019 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Jie, Qiang
Liang, Xiaoju
Wang, Xiaowei
Wu, Yongtao
Wu, Ge
Wang, Bing
Double ulnar osteomy for the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation
title Double ulnar osteomy for the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation
title_full Double ulnar osteomy for the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation
title_fullStr Double ulnar osteomy for the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation
title_full_unstemmed Double ulnar osteomy for the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation
title_short Double ulnar osteomy for the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation
title_sort double ulnar osteomy for the treatment of congenital radial head dislocation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6938992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.08.010
work_keys_str_mv AT jieqiang doubleulnarosteomyforthetreatmentofcongenitalradialheaddislocation
AT liangxiaoju doubleulnarosteomyforthetreatmentofcongenitalradialheaddislocation
AT wangxiaowei doubleulnarosteomyforthetreatmentofcongenitalradialheaddislocation
AT wuyongtao doubleulnarosteomyforthetreatmentofcongenitalradialheaddislocation
AT wuge doubleulnarosteomyforthetreatmentofcongenitalradialheaddislocation
AT wangbing doubleulnarosteomyforthetreatmentofcongenitalradialheaddislocation