Cargando…

Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the 6 degrees of freedom of the knee and gait data of patients with medial knee osteoarthritis before and after fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) ​and examine the influence of TKA on gait characteristics and the difference between FB and M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Yi-Ming, Yan, Meng-Ning, Li, Hui-Wu, Zhang, Jun, Wang, You
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.07.009
_version_ 1783484171781406720
author Zeng, Yi-Ming
Yan, Meng-Ning
Li, Hui-Wu
Zhang, Jun
Wang, You
author_facet Zeng, Yi-Ming
Yan, Meng-Ning
Li, Hui-Wu
Zhang, Jun
Wang, You
author_sort Zeng, Yi-Ming
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyse the 6 degrees of freedom of the knee and gait data of patients with medial knee osteoarthritis before and after fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) ​and examine the influence of TKA on gait characteristics and the difference between FB and MB prosthesis. We also sought to explore the prosthesis options available for TKA in these patients. METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent TKA at the Department of Orthopedics at our hospital from June to October 2017 were included. All patients had a lower limb mechanical axis (hip-knee-ankle angle) of less than 180° which were regarded as genu varum knees and had medial knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomised divided into the FB group ​and the MB group according to the knee prosthesis implanted. An infrared navigation three-dimensional portable knee motion analysis system (Opti-Knee®, Shanghai Innomotion, Inc.) was used to acquire data on the 6 degrees of freedom of both knees when walking on flat ground before and after surgery (angle of tibia relative to femur parameters: flexion-extension, internal rotation–external rotation, abduction–adduction; displacement parameters: anterior–posterior, proximal–distal, medial–lateral). Postoperative follow-up efficacy was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score system. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the maximum values of the internal/external rotation and flexion/extension angle between patients post-TKA and the healthy population, p values were 0.007 and <0.001,respectively. The postoperative maximum values of genu varum and internal rotation in both FB [(−9.49 ​± ​5.99°), (−5.77 ​± ​3.42°), respectively] and MB [(−9.64 ​± ​4.83°), (−7.54 ​± ​4.51°), respectively] groups were lower than the preoperative ones [FB (−15.13 ​± ​6.78°), (−8.28 ​± ​4.83°); MB (−13.28 ​± ​3.98°), (−9.46 ​± ​4.99°), respectively] (p ​≤ ​0.001), while the postoperative maximum values of flexion angle and anterior displacement in both FB [(46.11 ​± ​4.14°), (0.71 ​± ​0.35 ​cm), respectively] and MB [(49.33 ​± ​3.98°), (0.75 ​± ​0.89 ​cm), respectively] groups were larger than the preoperative ones [FB (43.15 ​± ​3.77°), (0.26 ​± ​0.74 ​cm); MB (44.62 ​± ​5.92°), (0.33 ​± ​0.79°), respectively] (p ​≤ ​0.001). The postoperative range of flexion/extension angle in both FB (40.13 ​± ​4.14°) and MB (45.82 ​± ​3.76°) groups was significantly larger than the preoperative one [FB (36.17 ​± ​6.07°), MB (37.09 ​± ​3.93°), respectively] (p ​≤ ​0.001). There were also significant increases in range of anterior–posterior displacement in the FB group (0.85 ​± ​0.32 ​cm) postoperatively compared with the preoperative one (0.71 ​± ​0.92 ​cm) (p ​= ​0.016) ​and significant increases in range of medial-lateral displacement (0.64 ​± ​0.73 ​cm) in the MB group postoperatively compared with the preoperative one (0.52 ​± ​0.91 ​cm) (p ​= ​0.025). The mean flexion/extension angle of the MB group was significantly greater than the FB group after surgery in both the stance phase and the swing phase (p ​< ​0.001). There were significant differences in postoperative knee axial rotation during the gait cycle between the MB and FB groups (p ​= ​0.028) ​and that postoperative internal rotation of the tibia relative to the femur increased in the MB group. The Oxford Knee Score at the last follow-up visit about 7.5 months after surgery was 15.6 ​± ​1.3 and 15.1 ​± ​1.1 points for FB and MB groups, respectively. This difference was not significant (p ​= ​0.428). CONCLUSIONS: TKA can make the parameters of knee gait characteristics closer to the normal population. Medial knee osteoarthritis patients who received a MB prosthesis in TKA had better joint flexion function and axial rotation than the FB one. However, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that the MB prosthesis is a better option for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: To date, no consensus for prosthesis selection in TKA has been established. This study found significant differences in joint flexion/extension angle and internal/external rotation during gait post-TKA surgery in medial knee osteoarthritis patients who received different prostheses. This will provide some references for prosthesis selection for a large number of genu varum patients in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6939107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69391072020-01-06 Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait Zeng, Yi-Ming Yan, Meng-Ning Li, Hui-Wu Zhang, Jun Wang, You J Orthop Translat Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyse the 6 degrees of freedom of the knee and gait data of patients with medial knee osteoarthritis before and after fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) ​and examine the influence of TKA on gait characteristics and the difference between FB and MB prosthesis. We also sought to explore the prosthesis options available for TKA in these patients. METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent TKA at the Department of Orthopedics at our hospital from June to October 2017 were included. All patients had a lower limb mechanical axis (hip-knee-ankle angle) of less than 180° which were regarded as genu varum knees and had medial knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomised divided into the FB group ​and the MB group according to the knee prosthesis implanted. An infrared navigation three-dimensional portable knee motion analysis system (Opti-Knee®, Shanghai Innomotion, Inc.) was used to acquire data on the 6 degrees of freedom of both knees when walking on flat ground before and after surgery (angle of tibia relative to femur parameters: flexion-extension, internal rotation–external rotation, abduction–adduction; displacement parameters: anterior–posterior, proximal–distal, medial–lateral). Postoperative follow-up efficacy was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score system. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the maximum values of the internal/external rotation and flexion/extension angle between patients post-TKA and the healthy population, p values were 0.007 and <0.001,respectively. The postoperative maximum values of genu varum and internal rotation in both FB [(−9.49 ​± ​5.99°), (−5.77 ​± ​3.42°), respectively] and MB [(−9.64 ​± ​4.83°), (−7.54 ​± ​4.51°), respectively] groups were lower than the preoperative ones [FB (−15.13 ​± ​6.78°), (−8.28 ​± ​4.83°); MB (−13.28 ​± ​3.98°), (−9.46 ​± ​4.99°), respectively] (p ​≤ ​0.001), while the postoperative maximum values of flexion angle and anterior displacement in both FB [(46.11 ​± ​4.14°), (0.71 ​± ​0.35 ​cm), respectively] and MB [(49.33 ​± ​3.98°), (0.75 ​± ​0.89 ​cm), respectively] groups were larger than the preoperative ones [FB (43.15 ​± ​3.77°), (0.26 ​± ​0.74 ​cm); MB (44.62 ​± ​5.92°), (0.33 ​± ​0.79°), respectively] (p ​≤ ​0.001). The postoperative range of flexion/extension angle in both FB (40.13 ​± ​4.14°) and MB (45.82 ​± ​3.76°) groups was significantly larger than the preoperative one [FB (36.17 ​± ​6.07°), MB (37.09 ​± ​3.93°), respectively] (p ​≤ ​0.001). There were also significant increases in range of anterior–posterior displacement in the FB group (0.85 ​± ​0.32 ​cm) postoperatively compared with the preoperative one (0.71 ​± ​0.92 ​cm) (p ​= ​0.016) ​and significant increases in range of medial-lateral displacement (0.64 ​± ​0.73 ​cm) in the MB group postoperatively compared with the preoperative one (0.52 ​± ​0.91 ​cm) (p ​= ​0.025). The mean flexion/extension angle of the MB group was significantly greater than the FB group after surgery in both the stance phase and the swing phase (p ​< ​0.001). There were significant differences in postoperative knee axial rotation during the gait cycle between the MB and FB groups (p ​= ​0.028) ​and that postoperative internal rotation of the tibia relative to the femur increased in the MB group. The Oxford Knee Score at the last follow-up visit about 7.5 months after surgery was 15.6 ​± ​1.3 and 15.1 ​± ​1.1 points for FB and MB groups, respectively. This difference was not significant (p ​= ​0.428). CONCLUSIONS: TKA can make the parameters of knee gait characteristics closer to the normal population. Medial knee osteoarthritis patients who received a MB prosthesis in TKA had better joint flexion function and axial rotation than the FB one. However, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that the MB prosthesis is a better option for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: To date, no consensus for prosthesis selection in TKA has been established. This study found significant differences in joint flexion/extension angle and internal/external rotation during gait post-TKA surgery in medial knee osteoarthritis patients who received different prostheses. This will provide some references for prosthesis selection for a large number of genu varum patients in clinical practice. Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2019-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6939107/ /pubmed/31908938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.07.009 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Zeng, Yi-Ming
Yan, Meng-Ning
Li, Hui-Wu
Zhang, Jun
Wang, You
Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait
title Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait
title_full Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait
title_fullStr Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait
title_full_unstemmed Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait
title_short Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait
title_sort does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? a randomised controlled study based on gait
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.07.009
work_keys_str_mv AT zengyiming doesmobilebearinghavebetterflexionandaxialrotationthanfixedbearingintotalkneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledstudybasedongait
AT yanmengning doesmobilebearinghavebetterflexionandaxialrotationthanfixedbearingintotalkneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledstudybasedongait
AT lihuiwu doesmobilebearinghavebetterflexionandaxialrotationthanfixedbearingintotalkneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledstudybasedongait
AT zhangjun doesmobilebearinghavebetterflexionandaxialrotationthanfixedbearingintotalkneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledstudybasedongait
AT wangyou doesmobilebearinghavebetterflexionandaxialrotationthanfixedbearingintotalkneearthroplastyarandomisedcontrolledstudybasedongait