Cargando…

A novel percutaneous crossed screws fixation in treatment of Day type II crescent fracture–dislocation: A finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE: Day type II crescent fracture–dislocation is a subtype of pelvic lateral compression injury. At present, there is still a controversy on the operative approach and fixation technique. We have put forward closed reduction and percutaneous crossed screws fixation for treating type-II cresce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Leyi, Zhang, Yingying, Zheng, Wenhao, Wang, Jianshun, Guo, Xiaoshan, Feng, Yongzeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.08.002
_version_ 1783484172478709760
author Cai, Leyi
Zhang, Yingying
Zheng, Wenhao
Wang, Jianshun
Guo, Xiaoshan
Feng, Yongzeng
author_facet Cai, Leyi
Zhang, Yingying
Zheng, Wenhao
Wang, Jianshun
Guo, Xiaoshan
Feng, Yongzeng
author_sort Cai, Leyi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Day type II crescent fracture–dislocation is a subtype of pelvic lateral compression injury. At present, there is still a controversy on the operative approach and fixation technique. We have put forward closed reduction and percutaneous crossed screws fixation for treating type-II crescent fracture–dislocation. Finite element analysis is used to compare the biomechanical properties between percutaneous crossed screws and other internal fixations. METHODS: A three-dimensional finite element model of Day type-II crescent fracture–dislocation was simulated using 5 implants, including double anterior plates (Model A), one posterior plate and one iliac screw (Model B), one sacroiliac joint screw (Model C), crossed one iliac screw and one sacroiliac joint screw (Model D), and crossed two iliac screws and one sacroiliac joint screw (Model E). 600-N stress was applied to S1 vertebral end-plate. To evaluate the biomechanical properties, the stress distribution and displacement distribution of the pelvis, stress distribution of the crescent fragment and stress distribution of plate and cannulated screw were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Under the loading of 600N, the maximum pelvic displacements in the finite element model were compared as follows: model E (0.070 ​mm), model D (0.071 ​mm), model A (0.080 ​mm), model C (0.096 ​mm), and model B (0.112 ​mm). The maximum displacements of crescent fragment were compared as follows: model E (0.018 ​mm), model B (0.022 ​mm), model D (0.023 ​mm), model A (0.030 ​mm), and model C (0.043 ​mm). The maximum stress of all implants were compared as follows: model D (90.01 ​Mpa), model E (81.60 ​Mpa), model C (69.07 ​Mpa), model A (56.51 ​Mpa), model B (18.29 ​Mpa). Model E and model D could provide better mechanical support for whole pelvic. CONCLUSIONS: With sufficient biomechanical stability and minimally invasive advantage, percutaneous crossed screw fixation is a recommended treatment for Day Type-II Crescent Fracture–dislocation. It is recommended to fix crescent fracture fragment and sacroiliac joint simultaneously during the operation. If it is difficult to fix the both position, the sacroiliac joint is preferentially fixed. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: There is a controversy on the operative approach and fixation technique of Day type-II crescent fracture–dislocation. This article proves that percutaneous crossed screw fixation is a recommended treatment for Day type-II crescent fracture–dislocation by finite element analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6939110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69391102020-01-06 A novel percutaneous crossed screws fixation in treatment of Day type II crescent fracture–dislocation: A finite element analysis Cai, Leyi Zhang, Yingying Zheng, Wenhao Wang, Jianshun Guo, Xiaoshan Feng, Yongzeng J Orthop Translat Original Article OBJECTIVE: Day type II crescent fracture–dislocation is a subtype of pelvic lateral compression injury. At present, there is still a controversy on the operative approach and fixation technique. We have put forward closed reduction and percutaneous crossed screws fixation for treating type-II crescent fracture–dislocation. Finite element analysis is used to compare the biomechanical properties between percutaneous crossed screws and other internal fixations. METHODS: A three-dimensional finite element model of Day type-II crescent fracture–dislocation was simulated using 5 implants, including double anterior plates (Model A), one posterior plate and one iliac screw (Model B), one sacroiliac joint screw (Model C), crossed one iliac screw and one sacroiliac joint screw (Model D), and crossed two iliac screws and one sacroiliac joint screw (Model E). 600-N stress was applied to S1 vertebral end-plate. To evaluate the biomechanical properties, the stress distribution and displacement distribution of the pelvis, stress distribution of the crescent fragment and stress distribution of plate and cannulated screw were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Under the loading of 600N, the maximum pelvic displacements in the finite element model were compared as follows: model E (0.070 ​mm), model D (0.071 ​mm), model A (0.080 ​mm), model C (0.096 ​mm), and model B (0.112 ​mm). The maximum displacements of crescent fragment were compared as follows: model E (0.018 ​mm), model B (0.022 ​mm), model D (0.023 ​mm), model A (0.030 ​mm), and model C (0.043 ​mm). The maximum stress of all implants were compared as follows: model D (90.01 ​Mpa), model E (81.60 ​Mpa), model C (69.07 ​Mpa), model A (56.51 ​Mpa), model B (18.29 ​Mpa). Model E and model D could provide better mechanical support for whole pelvic. CONCLUSIONS: With sufficient biomechanical stability and minimally invasive advantage, percutaneous crossed screw fixation is a recommended treatment for Day Type-II Crescent Fracture–dislocation. It is recommended to fix crescent fracture fragment and sacroiliac joint simultaneously during the operation. If it is difficult to fix the both position, the sacroiliac joint is preferentially fixed. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: There is a controversy on the operative approach and fixation technique of Day type-II crescent fracture–dislocation. This article proves that percutaneous crossed screw fixation is a recommended treatment for Day type-II crescent fracture–dislocation by finite element analysis. Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6939110/ /pubmed/31908932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.08.002 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Cai, Leyi
Zhang, Yingying
Zheng, Wenhao
Wang, Jianshun
Guo, Xiaoshan
Feng, Yongzeng
A novel percutaneous crossed screws fixation in treatment of Day type II crescent fracture–dislocation: A finite element analysis
title A novel percutaneous crossed screws fixation in treatment of Day type II crescent fracture–dislocation: A finite element analysis
title_full A novel percutaneous crossed screws fixation in treatment of Day type II crescent fracture–dislocation: A finite element analysis
title_fullStr A novel percutaneous crossed screws fixation in treatment of Day type II crescent fracture–dislocation: A finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed A novel percutaneous crossed screws fixation in treatment of Day type II crescent fracture–dislocation: A finite element analysis
title_short A novel percutaneous crossed screws fixation in treatment of Day type II crescent fracture–dislocation: A finite element analysis
title_sort novel percutaneous crossed screws fixation in treatment of day type ii crescent fracture–dislocation: a finite element analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.08.002
work_keys_str_mv AT caileyi anovelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhangyingying anovelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhengwenhao anovelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis
AT wangjianshun anovelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis
AT guoxiaoshan anovelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis
AT fengyongzeng anovelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis
AT caileyi novelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhangyingying novelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhengwenhao novelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis
AT wangjianshun novelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis
AT guoxiaoshan novelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis
AT fengyongzeng novelpercutaneouscrossedscrewsfixationintreatmentofdaytypeiicrescentfracturedislocationafiniteelementanalysis