Cargando…

Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (modified MIS-TLIF) versus conventional TLIF in the lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Peng, Chen, Kangwu, Chen, Hao, Zhang, Kai, Sun, Jiajia, Yang, Peng, Zhou, Feng, Liu, Yu, Yang, Huilin, Mao, Haiqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.10.001
_version_ 1783484173634240512
author Peng, Peng
Chen, Kangwu
Chen, Hao
Zhang, Kai
Sun, Jiajia
Yang, Peng
Zhou, Feng
Liu, Yu
Yang, Huilin
Mao, Haiqing
author_facet Peng, Peng
Chen, Kangwu
Chen, Hao
Zhang, Kai
Sun, Jiajia
Yang, Peng
Zhou, Feng
Liu, Yu
Yang, Huilin
Mao, Haiqing
author_sort Peng, Peng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (modified MIS-TLIF) versus conventional TLIF in the lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with 1-level lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis were enrolled in the study. Perioperative indexes including operation time, intraoperative bleeding, bed rest time, time of hospitalisation stay and the accuracy rate of screw placement were analysed. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were assessed. RESULTS: The operation time in the modified MIS-TLIF group was longer than the conventional TLIF group (p ​< ​0.05). However, intraoperative blood loss in the modified MIS-TLIF group was less than the comparative group (p ​< ​0.05). The average bed rest time and hospitalisation stay in the modified MIS-TLIF group was shorter than conventional TLIF group (p ​< ​0.05). The screw placement in the modified MIS-TLIF group was more precisely than that in the conventional TLIF group (p ​< ​0.05). Meanwhile, the improvement of VAS and ODI in the modified MIS-TLIF group were lower than that in the conventional TLIF group 1 and 6 months after operation (p ​< ​0.05). There was no difference in the VAS and ODI score between the two group at the last follow-up (p ​> ​0.05). CONCLUSION: Navigation and microscope-assisted MIS-TLIF is safe and reliable for treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis (Meyerding degree I or II) with potential advantages including less injury, less blood loss, higher screw accuracy and faster recovery after operation. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: Compared with conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion has a huge advantage in surgery treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. Hence, this article provided a better surgery method to deal with lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis, and robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion will be adopted in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6939115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69391152020-01-06 Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis Peng, Peng Chen, Kangwu Chen, Hao Zhang, Kai Sun, Jiajia Yang, Peng Zhou, Feng Liu, Yu Yang, Huilin Mao, Haiqing J Orthop Translat Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (modified MIS-TLIF) versus conventional TLIF in the lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with 1-level lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis were enrolled in the study. Perioperative indexes including operation time, intraoperative bleeding, bed rest time, time of hospitalisation stay and the accuracy rate of screw placement were analysed. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were assessed. RESULTS: The operation time in the modified MIS-TLIF group was longer than the conventional TLIF group (p ​< ​0.05). However, intraoperative blood loss in the modified MIS-TLIF group was less than the comparative group (p ​< ​0.05). The average bed rest time and hospitalisation stay in the modified MIS-TLIF group was shorter than conventional TLIF group (p ​< ​0.05). The screw placement in the modified MIS-TLIF group was more precisely than that in the conventional TLIF group (p ​< ​0.05). Meanwhile, the improvement of VAS and ODI in the modified MIS-TLIF group were lower than that in the conventional TLIF group 1 and 6 months after operation (p ​< ​0.05). There was no difference in the VAS and ODI score between the two group at the last follow-up (p ​> ​0.05). CONCLUSION: Navigation and microscope-assisted MIS-TLIF is safe and reliable for treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis (Meyerding degree I or II) with potential advantages including less injury, less blood loss, higher screw accuracy and faster recovery after operation. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: Compared with conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion has a huge advantage in surgery treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. Hence, this article provided a better surgery method to deal with lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis, and robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion will be adopted in the future. Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6939115/ /pubmed/31908941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.10.001 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Peng, Peng
Chen, Kangwu
Chen, Hao
Zhang, Kai
Sun, Jiajia
Yang, Peng
Zhou, Feng
Liu, Yu
Yang, Huilin
Mao, Haiqing
Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis
title Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis
title_full Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis
title_fullStr Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis
title_short Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis
title_sort comparison of o-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT pengpeng comparisonofoarmnavigationandmicroscopeassistedminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandconventionaltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbaristhmicspondylolisthesis
AT chenkangwu comparisonofoarmnavigationandmicroscopeassistedminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandconventionaltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbaristhmicspondylolisthesis
AT chenhao comparisonofoarmnavigationandmicroscopeassistedminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandconventionaltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbaristhmicspondylolisthesis
AT zhangkai comparisonofoarmnavigationandmicroscopeassistedminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandconventionaltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbaristhmicspondylolisthesis
AT sunjiajia comparisonofoarmnavigationandmicroscopeassistedminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandconventionaltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbaristhmicspondylolisthesis
AT yangpeng comparisonofoarmnavigationandmicroscopeassistedminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandconventionaltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbaristhmicspondylolisthesis
AT zhoufeng comparisonofoarmnavigationandmicroscopeassistedminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandconventionaltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbaristhmicspondylolisthesis
AT liuyu comparisonofoarmnavigationandmicroscopeassistedminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandconventionaltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbaristhmicspondylolisthesis
AT yanghuilin comparisonofoarmnavigationandmicroscopeassistedminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandconventionaltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbaristhmicspondylolisthesis
AT maohaiqing comparisonofoarmnavigationandmicroscopeassistedminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandconventionaltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbaristhmicspondylolisthesis