Cargando…
Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia
BACKGROUND: To compare the application and efficacy of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in labor analgesia. METHODS: Three hundred sixty pregnant women requesting labor analgesia from October 2017 to August 2...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0855-y |
_version_ | 1783484195168845824 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yanshuang Xu, Mingjun |
author_facet | Wang, Yanshuang Xu, Mingjun |
author_sort | Wang, Yanshuang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the application and efficacy of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in labor analgesia. METHODS: Three hundred sixty pregnant women requesting labor analgesia from October 2017 to August 2018 were selected retrospectively. According to the anesthetic method, subjects were divided into CSEA group and CEA group. Ropivacaine combined with sufentanil were used in all subjects. The labor time, visual analogue scale (VAS), Apgar score of newborn, adverse pregnancy outcomes and adverse drug reactions were observed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pre-analgesia (T(0)) VAS scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). VAS scores of first stage of labor (T(1)), second stage of labor (T(2)) and third stage of labor (T(3)) in CSEA group were significantly lower than CEA group (P < 0.01). The onset time, T(1) and total labor time in CSEA group were significantly shorter than CEA group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between T2 and T3 (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and Apgar scores at 1, 5 and 10 min after birth between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse drug outcomes in CSEA group was significantly lower than CEA group (P < 0.01). Maternal satisfaction in CSEA group was significantly higher than CEA group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Considering ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for CSEA achieved a shorter onset time and labor period, significant analgesic effect, lower adverse drug reactions rates and higher subject satisfaction than CEA, it may be worthy of clinical promotion and application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6939327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69393272020-01-06 Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia Wang, Yanshuang Xu, Mingjun BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the application and efficacy of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in labor analgesia. METHODS: Three hundred sixty pregnant women requesting labor analgesia from October 2017 to August 2018 were selected retrospectively. According to the anesthetic method, subjects were divided into CSEA group and CEA group. Ropivacaine combined with sufentanil were used in all subjects. The labor time, visual analogue scale (VAS), Apgar score of newborn, adverse pregnancy outcomes and adverse drug reactions were observed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pre-analgesia (T(0)) VAS scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). VAS scores of first stage of labor (T(1)), second stage of labor (T(2)) and third stage of labor (T(3)) in CSEA group were significantly lower than CEA group (P < 0.01). The onset time, T(1) and total labor time in CSEA group were significantly shorter than CEA group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between T2 and T3 (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and Apgar scores at 1, 5 and 10 min after birth between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse drug outcomes in CSEA group was significantly lower than CEA group (P < 0.01). Maternal satisfaction in CSEA group was significantly higher than CEA group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Considering ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for CSEA achieved a shorter onset time and labor period, significant analgesic effect, lower adverse drug reactions rates and higher subject satisfaction than CEA, it may be worthy of clinical promotion and application. BioMed Central 2020-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6939327/ /pubmed/31898488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0855-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Yanshuang Xu, Mingjun Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia |
title | Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia |
title_full | Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia |
title_short | Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia |
title_sort | comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0855-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyanshuang comparisonofropivacainecombinedwithsufentanilforepiduralanesthesiaandspinalepiduralanesthesiainlaboranalgesia AT xumingjun comparisonofropivacainecombinedwithsufentanilforepiduralanesthesiaandspinalepiduralanesthesiainlaboranalgesia |