Cargando…
Erratum: Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920241 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.189878 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation
por: Bruceta, Melanio A., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparison of the Air-Q intubating laryngeal mask airway and the Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask airway as a conduit for fibreoptic assisted endotracheal intubation for simulated cervical spine injury
por: Omar, Sanihah Che, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparative evaluation of Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA), I-gel and Ambu AuraGain for blind tracheal intubation in adults
por: Sarma, Riniki, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A new second-generation supraglottic airway device (Ambu(®) AuraGain(•)) versus intubating laryngeal mask airway as conduits for blind intubation – A prospective, randomised trial
por: Sudheesh, K, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparison of Ambu AuraGain at low cuff pressure, Ambu AuraGain at high cuff pressure and i-gel in relation to incidence of postoperative upper airway complications
por: Deepak, G P, et al.
Publicado: (2021)