Cargando…

Marketing Influences on Perceptions of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes

INTRODUCTION: The Food and Drug Administration announced intent to reduce the nicotine content in cigarettes. There is limited evidence on how reduced nicotine content cigarette (RNC) marketing affects product beliefs and use, and research on this is needed to inform regulations. METHODS: In an onli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Andrea C, Mays, Darren, Villanti, Andrea C, Niaura, Raymond S, Rehberg, Kathryn, Phan, Lilianna, Mercincavage, Melissa, Luta, George, Strasser, Andrew A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz167
_version_ 1783484251631517696
author Johnson, Andrea C
Mays, Darren
Villanti, Andrea C
Niaura, Raymond S
Rehberg, Kathryn
Phan, Lilianna
Mercincavage, Melissa
Luta, George
Strasser, Andrew A
author_facet Johnson, Andrea C
Mays, Darren
Villanti, Andrea C
Niaura, Raymond S
Rehberg, Kathryn
Phan, Lilianna
Mercincavage, Melissa
Luta, George
Strasser, Andrew A
author_sort Johnson, Andrea C
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Food and Drug Administration announced intent to reduce the nicotine content in cigarettes. There is limited evidence on how reduced nicotine content cigarette (RNC) marketing affects product beliefs and use, and research on this is needed to inform regulations. METHODS: In an online experiment, 426 young adult cigarette smokers (aged 18–30 years) were randomized in a 2 (implicit: red package vs. blue package) × 2 (explicit: corrective message vs. no corrective message) design to view an advertisement for previously commercially available RNCs. Outcomes were advertisement content recall, product beliefs, and use intentions. Participants’ responses to open-ended assessment of their beliefs about the stimuli were coded to identify prevailing themes. RESULTS: Red packaging and corrective messaging were independently associated with greater advertisement content recall (p = .01 and p = .04, respectively). There were no significant main or interaction effects on product beliefs or use intentions. Controlling for condition, advertisement content recall was significantly associated with less favorable product beliefs (p < .001) and favorable product beliefs were associated with intent to use the product (p < .001). Open-ended responses converged on the finding that respondents were interested in RNCs, but expressed skepticism about effectiveness and value. CONCLUSIONS: Brief exposure to an RNC advertisement with red packaging and corrective messaging were each independently associated with greater advertisement content recall. The results indicate: (1) interest and confusion among young adult smokers regarding RNCs, (2) beliefs about RNCs are influenced by marketing, and (3) beliefs are associated with intention to use RNCs. IMPLICATIONS: Findings from this study demonstrate the importance of advertising effects on beliefs about RNC products and support the need to regulate advertising and labeling alongside product regulation. More detailed study of advertisement features that affect consumers’ beliefs about RNCs and how they impact their processing of explicit messaging about product risks will be important to guide regulatory decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6939778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69397782020-01-07 Marketing Influences on Perceptions of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes Johnson, Andrea C Mays, Darren Villanti, Andrea C Niaura, Raymond S Rehberg, Kathryn Phan, Lilianna Mercincavage, Melissa Luta, George Strasser, Andrew A Nicotine Tob Res Perceptions and Communications INTRODUCTION: The Food and Drug Administration announced intent to reduce the nicotine content in cigarettes. There is limited evidence on how reduced nicotine content cigarette (RNC) marketing affects product beliefs and use, and research on this is needed to inform regulations. METHODS: In an online experiment, 426 young adult cigarette smokers (aged 18–30 years) were randomized in a 2 (implicit: red package vs. blue package) × 2 (explicit: corrective message vs. no corrective message) design to view an advertisement for previously commercially available RNCs. Outcomes were advertisement content recall, product beliefs, and use intentions. Participants’ responses to open-ended assessment of their beliefs about the stimuli were coded to identify prevailing themes. RESULTS: Red packaging and corrective messaging were independently associated with greater advertisement content recall (p = .01 and p = .04, respectively). There were no significant main or interaction effects on product beliefs or use intentions. Controlling for condition, advertisement content recall was significantly associated with less favorable product beliefs (p < .001) and favorable product beliefs were associated with intent to use the product (p < .001). Open-ended responses converged on the finding that respondents were interested in RNCs, but expressed skepticism about effectiveness and value. CONCLUSIONS: Brief exposure to an RNC advertisement with red packaging and corrective messaging were each independently associated with greater advertisement content recall. The results indicate: (1) interest and confusion among young adult smokers regarding RNCs, (2) beliefs about RNCs are influenced by marketing, and (3) beliefs are associated with intention to use RNCs. IMPLICATIONS: Findings from this study demonstrate the importance of advertising effects on beliefs about RNC products and support the need to regulate advertising and labeling alongside product regulation. More detailed study of advertisement features that affect consumers’ beliefs about RNCs and how they impact their processing of explicit messaging about product risks will be important to guide regulatory decision-making. Oxford University Press 2019-12 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6939778/ /pubmed/31867656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz167 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Perceptions and Communications
Johnson, Andrea C
Mays, Darren
Villanti, Andrea C
Niaura, Raymond S
Rehberg, Kathryn
Phan, Lilianna
Mercincavage, Melissa
Luta, George
Strasser, Andrew A
Marketing Influences on Perceptions of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes
title Marketing Influences on Perceptions of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes
title_full Marketing Influences on Perceptions of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes
title_fullStr Marketing Influences on Perceptions of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes
title_full_unstemmed Marketing Influences on Perceptions of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes
title_short Marketing Influences on Perceptions of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes
title_sort marketing influences on perceptions of reduced nicotine content cigarettes
topic Perceptions and Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz167
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonandreac marketinginfluencesonperceptionsofreducednicotinecontentcigarettes
AT maysdarren marketinginfluencesonperceptionsofreducednicotinecontentcigarettes
AT villantiandreac marketinginfluencesonperceptionsofreducednicotinecontentcigarettes
AT niauraraymonds marketinginfluencesonperceptionsofreducednicotinecontentcigarettes
AT rehbergkathryn marketinginfluencesonperceptionsofreducednicotinecontentcigarettes
AT phanlilianna marketinginfluencesonperceptionsofreducednicotinecontentcigarettes
AT mercincavagemelissa marketinginfluencesonperceptionsofreducednicotinecontentcigarettes
AT lutageorge marketinginfluencesonperceptionsofreducednicotinecontentcigarettes
AT strasserandrewa marketinginfluencesonperceptionsofreducednicotinecontentcigarettes