Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treatment of acute bacterial infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of omadacycline for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients through meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases were searched up to May 2019. Only randomized controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lan, Shao-Huan, Chang, Shen-Peng, Lai, Chih-Cheng, Lu, Li-Chin, Chao, Chien-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6940113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018426
_version_ 1783484298093920256
author Lan, Shao-Huan
Chang, Shen-Peng
Lai, Chih-Cheng
Lu, Li-Chin
Chao, Chien-Ming
author_facet Lan, Shao-Huan
Chang, Shen-Peng
Lai, Chih-Cheng
Lu, Li-Chin
Chao, Chien-Ming
author_sort Lan, Shao-Huan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of omadacycline for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients through meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases were searched up to May 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated omadacycline and other comparators for treating acute bacterial infections in adult patients were included. The primary outcome was the clinical response rate at the posttreatment evaluation, whereas the secondary outcomes were risk of an adverse event (AE) and mortality. RESULTS: Four RCTs were included. Overall, omadacycline had a clinical response rate noninferior to comparators in the treatment of acute bacterial infection in the modified intent-to-treat population (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.65; I(2) = 0%) and in the clinically evaluable population (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.11–2.11; I(2) = 0%). Furthermore, no significant differences were found between omadacycline and comparators for the risk of treatment-emergent AEs (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.60–2.14; I(2) = 93%), treatment-related AEs (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.46–1.04; I(2) = 56%), serious AEs (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.64–1.58; I(2) = 0%), and discontinuation of study drug due to an AE (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.47–1.29; I(2) = 0%). However, in the clinical trial, NCT02877927, in which omadacycline was used in only oral form, the reported incidence of nausea and vomiting were 30.2% (111/368) and 16.9% (62/368), respectively. Finally, the mortality rate was similar between omadacycline and comparator in the treatment of acute bacterial infection (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.47–3.67; I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy of omadacycline is not inferior to that of comparators in the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients, and this antibiotic is also well tolerated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6940113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69401132020-01-31 The efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treatment of acute bacterial infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Lan, Shao-Huan Chang, Shen-Peng Lai, Chih-Cheng Lu, Li-Chin Chao, Chien-Ming Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of omadacycline for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients through meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases were searched up to May 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated omadacycline and other comparators for treating acute bacterial infections in adult patients were included. The primary outcome was the clinical response rate at the posttreatment evaluation, whereas the secondary outcomes were risk of an adverse event (AE) and mortality. RESULTS: Four RCTs were included. Overall, omadacycline had a clinical response rate noninferior to comparators in the treatment of acute bacterial infection in the modified intent-to-treat population (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.65; I(2) = 0%) and in the clinically evaluable population (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.11–2.11; I(2) = 0%). Furthermore, no significant differences were found between omadacycline and comparators for the risk of treatment-emergent AEs (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.60–2.14; I(2) = 93%), treatment-related AEs (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.46–1.04; I(2) = 56%), serious AEs (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.64–1.58; I(2) = 0%), and discontinuation of study drug due to an AE (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.47–1.29; I(2) = 0%). However, in the clinical trial, NCT02877927, in which omadacycline was used in only oral form, the reported incidence of nausea and vomiting were 30.2% (111/368) and 16.9% (62/368), respectively. Finally, the mortality rate was similar between omadacycline and comparator in the treatment of acute bacterial infection (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.47–3.67; I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy of omadacycline is not inferior to that of comparators in the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients, and this antibiotic is also well tolerated. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6940113/ /pubmed/31861009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018426 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4900
Lan, Shao-Huan
Chang, Shen-Peng
Lai, Chih-Cheng
Lu, Li-Chin
Chao, Chien-Ming
The efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treatment of acute bacterial infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title The efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treatment of acute bacterial infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full The efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treatment of acute bacterial infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treatment of acute bacterial infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treatment of acute bacterial infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short The efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treatment of acute bacterial infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treatment of acute bacterial infection: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic 4900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6940113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018426
work_keys_str_mv AT lanshaohuan theefficacyandsafetyofomadacyclineintreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT changshenpeng theefficacyandsafetyofomadacyclineintreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT laichihcheng theefficacyandsafetyofomadacyclineintreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lulichin theefficacyandsafetyofomadacyclineintreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chaochienming theefficacyandsafetyofomadacyclineintreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lanshaohuan efficacyandsafetyofomadacyclineintreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT changshenpeng efficacyandsafetyofomadacyclineintreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT laichihcheng efficacyandsafetyofomadacyclineintreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lulichin efficacyandsafetyofomadacyclineintreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chaochienming efficacyandsafetyofomadacyclineintreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials