Cargando…
The Meat Paradox, Omnivore’s Akrasia, and Animal Ethics
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Psychologists have used the term “meat paradox” to explain why people may emphasize their concern for animal welfare and yet eat meat, the production of which has caused suffering to nonhuman creatures. This paper explores the meat paradox through the philosophical concept “akrasia”....
Autor principal: | Aaltola, Elisa |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6940846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842260 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9121125 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions
of Emotion Regulation
por: Szanto, Thomas
Publicado: (2017) -
Ethical meat: respect for farm animals
por: Pulina, Giuseppe
Publicado: (2020) -
Restriction of meat, fish, and poultry in omnivores improves mood: A pilot randomized controlled trial
por: Beezhold, Bonnie L, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Paradoxical effects of lipolysis on the lipid oxidation in meat and meat products
por: Tatiyaborworntham, Nantawat, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Heartfulness in Vegans, Vegetarians, and Omnivores
por: Voll, Antonia, et al.
Publicado: (2023)