Cargando…
Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study
BACKGROUND: Improving physical activity (PA) is a core component of secondary prevention and cardiac (tele)rehabilitation. Commercially available activity trackers are frequently used to monitor and promote PA in cardiac patients. However, studies on the validity of these devices in cardiac patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6940867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31855191 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15045 |
_version_ | 1783484427921260544 |
---|---|
author | Herkert, Cyrille Kraal, Jos Johannes van Loon, Eline Maria Agnes van Hooff, Martijn Kemps, Hareld Marijn Clemens |
author_facet | Herkert, Cyrille Kraal, Jos Johannes van Loon, Eline Maria Agnes van Hooff, Martijn Kemps, Hareld Marijn Clemens |
author_sort | Herkert, Cyrille |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improving physical activity (PA) is a core component of secondary prevention and cardiac (tele)rehabilitation. Commercially available activity trackers are frequently used to monitor and promote PA in cardiac patients. However, studies on the validity of these devices in cardiac patients are scarce. As cardiac patients are being advised and treated based on PA parameters measured by these devices, it is highly important to evaluate the accuracy of these parameters in this specific population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and responsiveness of 2 wrist-worn activity trackers, Fitbit Charge 2 (FC2) and Mio Slice (MS), for the assessment of energy expenditure (EE) in cardiac patients. METHODS: EE assessed by the activity trackers was compared with indirect calorimetry (Oxycon Mobile [OM]) during a laboratory activity protocol. Two groups were assessed: patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were included: 19 with CAD and 19 with HFrEF (LVEF 31.8%, SD 7.6%). The CAD group showed no significant difference in total EE between FC2 and OM (47.5 kcal, SD 112 kcal; P=.09), in contrast to a significant difference between MS and OM (88 kcal, SD 108 kcal; P=.003). The HFrEF group showed significant differences in EE between FC2 and OM (38 kcal, SD 57 kcal; P=.01), as well as between MS and OM (106 kcal, SD 167 kcal; P=.02). Agreement of the activity trackers was low in both groups (CAD: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] FC2=0.10, ICC MS=0.12; HFrEF: ICC FC2=0.42, ICC MS=0.11). The responsiveness of FC2 was poor, whereas MS was able to detect changes in cycling loads only. CONCLUSIONS: Both activity trackers demonstrated low accuracy in estimating EE in cardiac patients and poor performance to detect within-patient changes in the low-to-moderate exercise intensity domain. Although the use of activity trackers in cardiac patients is promising and could enhance daily exercise behavior, these findings highlight the need for population-specific devices and algorithms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6940867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69408672020-01-13 Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study Herkert, Cyrille Kraal, Jos Johannes van Loon, Eline Maria Agnes van Hooff, Martijn Kemps, Hareld Marijn Clemens JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Improving physical activity (PA) is a core component of secondary prevention and cardiac (tele)rehabilitation. Commercially available activity trackers are frequently used to monitor and promote PA in cardiac patients. However, studies on the validity of these devices in cardiac patients are scarce. As cardiac patients are being advised and treated based on PA parameters measured by these devices, it is highly important to evaluate the accuracy of these parameters in this specific population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and responsiveness of 2 wrist-worn activity trackers, Fitbit Charge 2 (FC2) and Mio Slice (MS), for the assessment of energy expenditure (EE) in cardiac patients. METHODS: EE assessed by the activity trackers was compared with indirect calorimetry (Oxycon Mobile [OM]) during a laboratory activity protocol. Two groups were assessed: patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were included: 19 with CAD and 19 with HFrEF (LVEF 31.8%, SD 7.6%). The CAD group showed no significant difference in total EE between FC2 and OM (47.5 kcal, SD 112 kcal; P=.09), in contrast to a significant difference between MS and OM (88 kcal, SD 108 kcal; P=.003). The HFrEF group showed significant differences in EE between FC2 and OM (38 kcal, SD 57 kcal; P=.01), as well as between MS and OM (106 kcal, SD 167 kcal; P=.02). Agreement of the activity trackers was low in both groups (CAD: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] FC2=0.10, ICC MS=0.12; HFrEF: ICC FC2=0.42, ICC MS=0.11). The responsiveness of FC2 was poor, whereas MS was able to detect changes in cycling loads only. CONCLUSIONS: Both activity trackers demonstrated low accuracy in estimating EE in cardiac patients and poor performance to detect within-patient changes in the low-to-moderate exercise intensity domain. Although the use of activity trackers in cardiac patients is promising and could enhance daily exercise behavior, these findings highlight the need for population-specific devices and algorithms. JMIR Publications 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6940867/ /pubmed/31855191 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15045 Text en ©Cyrille Herkert, Jos Johannes Kraal, Eline Maria Agnes van Loon, Martijn van Hooff, Hareld Marijn Clemens Kemps. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 19.12.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Herkert, Cyrille Kraal, Jos Johannes van Loon, Eline Maria Agnes van Hooff, Martijn Kemps, Hareld Marijn Clemens Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study |
title | Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study |
title_full | Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study |
title_fullStr | Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study |
title_short | Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study |
title_sort | usefulness of modern activity trackers for monitoring exercise behavior in chronic cardiac patients: validation study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6940867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31855191 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herkertcyrille usefulnessofmodernactivitytrackersformonitoringexercisebehaviorinchroniccardiacpatientsvalidationstudy AT kraaljosjohannes usefulnessofmodernactivitytrackersformonitoringexercisebehaviorinchroniccardiacpatientsvalidationstudy AT vanloonelinemariaagnes usefulnessofmodernactivitytrackersformonitoringexercisebehaviorinchroniccardiacpatientsvalidationstudy AT vanhooffmartijn usefulnessofmodernactivitytrackersformonitoringexercisebehaviorinchroniccardiacpatientsvalidationstudy AT kempshareldmarijnclemens usefulnessofmodernactivitytrackersformonitoringexercisebehaviorinchroniccardiacpatientsvalidationstudy |