Cargando…

Exploring the decoy effect to guide tobacco treatment choice: a randomized experiment

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend that smokers participate in four or more counseling sessions when trying to quit, but smokers rarely engage in multiple sessions. The “decoy effect” is a cognitive bias that can cause consumer preferences for a “target” product to change when presented with a similar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogers, Erin S., Vargas, Elizabeth A., Voigt, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4873-0
_version_ 1783484513529102336
author Rogers, Erin S.
Vargas, Elizabeth A.
Voigt, Elizabeth
author_facet Rogers, Erin S.
Vargas, Elizabeth A.
Voigt, Elizabeth
author_sort Rogers, Erin S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend that smokers participate in four or more counseling sessions when trying to quit, but smokers rarely engage in multiple sessions. The “decoy effect” is a cognitive bias that can cause consumer preferences for a “target” product to change when presented with a similar but inferior product (a “decoy”). This study tested the use of a decoy to guide smokers’ selection of a target number of counseling sessions. During an online survey, adult tobacco users (N = 93) were randomized to one of two groups that determined the answer choices they saw in response to a question assessing their interest in multi-session cessation counseling. Group A choose between two sessions or a “target” of five sessions. Group B was given a third “decoy” option of seven sessions. Binary logistic regression was used to compare groups on the proportion of participants selecting the “target.” RESULTS: Among 90 participants with complete data, a decoy effect was not found. There was no significant difference between groups in the proportion of participants selecting the target of five sessions (47% in Group B vs. 53% in Group A; aOR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.48–1.19). Trial Registration This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov on December 13, 2019 (NCT04200157)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6941248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69412482020-01-06 Exploring the decoy effect to guide tobacco treatment choice: a randomized experiment Rogers, Erin S. Vargas, Elizabeth A. Voigt, Elizabeth BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend that smokers participate in four or more counseling sessions when trying to quit, but smokers rarely engage in multiple sessions. The “decoy effect” is a cognitive bias that can cause consumer preferences for a “target” product to change when presented with a similar but inferior product (a “decoy”). This study tested the use of a decoy to guide smokers’ selection of a target number of counseling sessions. During an online survey, adult tobacco users (N = 93) were randomized to one of two groups that determined the answer choices they saw in response to a question assessing their interest in multi-session cessation counseling. Group A choose between two sessions or a “target” of five sessions. Group B was given a third “decoy” option of seven sessions. Binary logistic regression was used to compare groups on the proportion of participants selecting the “target.” RESULTS: Among 90 participants with complete data, a decoy effect was not found. There was no significant difference between groups in the proportion of participants selecting the target of five sessions (47% in Group B vs. 53% in Group A; aOR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.48–1.19). Trial Registration This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov on December 13, 2019 (NCT04200157) BioMed Central 2020-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6941248/ /pubmed/31898550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4873-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Note
Rogers, Erin S.
Vargas, Elizabeth A.
Voigt, Elizabeth
Exploring the decoy effect to guide tobacco treatment choice: a randomized experiment
title Exploring the decoy effect to guide tobacco treatment choice: a randomized experiment
title_full Exploring the decoy effect to guide tobacco treatment choice: a randomized experiment
title_fullStr Exploring the decoy effect to guide tobacco treatment choice: a randomized experiment
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the decoy effect to guide tobacco treatment choice: a randomized experiment
title_short Exploring the decoy effect to guide tobacco treatment choice: a randomized experiment
title_sort exploring the decoy effect to guide tobacco treatment choice: a randomized experiment
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4873-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rogerserins exploringthedecoyeffecttoguidetobaccotreatmentchoicearandomizedexperiment
AT vargaselizabetha exploringthedecoyeffecttoguidetobaccotreatmentchoicearandomizedexperiment
AT voigtelizabeth exploringthedecoyeffecttoguidetobaccotreatmentchoicearandomizedexperiment