Cargando…

Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol

BACKGROUND: The successful implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical routine faces many challenges, first and foremost the lack of consideration thereof in the patient care process. The aim of this study will be to first identify relevant barriers and facilitators and then desig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Görlach, Mirja Gianna, Schrage, Theresa, Bokemeyer, Carsten, Kröger, Nicolaus, Müller, Volkmar, Petersen, Cordula, Betz, Christian Stephan, Krüll, Andreas, Schulz, Holger, Bleich, Christiane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1262-2
_version_ 1783484514237939712
author Görlach, Mirja Gianna
Schrage, Theresa
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Kröger, Nicolaus
Müller, Volkmar
Petersen, Cordula
Betz, Christian Stephan
Krüll, Andreas
Schulz, Holger
Bleich, Christiane
author_facet Görlach, Mirja Gianna
Schrage, Theresa
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Kröger, Nicolaus
Müller, Volkmar
Petersen, Cordula
Betz, Christian Stephan
Krüll, Andreas
Schulz, Holger
Bleich, Christiane
author_sort Görlach, Mirja Gianna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The successful implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical routine faces many challenges, first and foremost the lack of consideration thereof in the patient care process. The aim of this study will be to first identify relevant barriers and facilitators and then design suitable implementation strategies which will be evaluated to improve the effectiveness of a PRO measure assessment in inpatient and outpatient cancer routine care. METHODS: During the preparation phase, interviews with oncological patients (N = 28) and medical staff (N = 4) as well as focus groups with medical staff (N = 18) across five different departments caring for cancer patients were conducted. On the basis of these, qualitative content analysis revealed relevant barriers and facilitators for implementation of PROs in cancer care. Subsequently, implementation strategies and a model of implementation were developed. In the study phase, implementation strategies will be evaluated based on nine different implementation outcomes in five different oncological clinics. Evaluation of the implementation process will take place during three months in each clinic and data will be conducted pre, while and post implementation of the PRO measure. Therefore a sample size of 60 participants of whom 30 staff members and 30 participants will be questioned using existing and newly developed implementation outcome evaluation instruments. DISCUSSION: Key to improving the effectiveness of PRO assessment in the time-critical clinical environment is the utilization of easy-to-use, electronic PRO questionnaires directly linked to patients’ records thereby improving consideration of PROs in patient care. In order to validate the effectiveness of this implementation process further, an evaluation parallel to implementation following an observational study design with a mixed-methods approach will be conducted. This study could contribute to the development of adequate evaluation processes of implementation of PROs to foster sustainable integration of PRO measures into routine cancer care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6941251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69412512020-01-06 Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol Görlach, Mirja Gianna Schrage, Theresa Bokemeyer, Carsten Kröger, Nicolaus Müller, Volkmar Petersen, Cordula Betz, Christian Stephan Krüll, Andreas Schulz, Holger Bleich, Christiane Health Qual Life Outcomes Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The successful implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical routine faces many challenges, first and foremost the lack of consideration thereof in the patient care process. The aim of this study will be to first identify relevant barriers and facilitators and then design suitable implementation strategies which will be evaluated to improve the effectiveness of a PRO measure assessment in inpatient and outpatient cancer routine care. METHODS: During the preparation phase, interviews with oncological patients (N = 28) and medical staff (N = 4) as well as focus groups with medical staff (N = 18) across five different departments caring for cancer patients were conducted. On the basis of these, qualitative content analysis revealed relevant barriers and facilitators for implementation of PROs in cancer care. Subsequently, implementation strategies and a model of implementation were developed. In the study phase, implementation strategies will be evaluated based on nine different implementation outcomes in five different oncological clinics. Evaluation of the implementation process will take place during three months in each clinic and data will be conducted pre, while and post implementation of the PRO measure. Therefore a sample size of 60 participants of whom 30 staff members and 30 participants will be questioned using existing and newly developed implementation outcome evaluation instruments. DISCUSSION: Key to improving the effectiveness of PRO assessment in the time-critical clinical environment is the utilization of easy-to-use, electronic PRO questionnaires directly linked to patients’ records thereby improving consideration of PROs in patient care. In order to validate the effectiveness of this implementation process further, an evaluation parallel to implementation following an observational study design with a mixed-methods approach will be conducted. This study could contribute to the development of adequate evaluation processes of implementation of PROs to foster sustainable integration of PRO measures into routine cancer care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/). BioMed Central 2020-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6941251/ /pubmed/31898544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1262-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Görlach, Mirja Gianna
Schrage, Theresa
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Kröger, Nicolaus
Müller, Volkmar
Petersen, Cordula
Betz, Christian Stephan
Krüll, Andreas
Schulz, Holger
Bleich, Christiane
Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol
title Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol
title_full Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol
title_fullStr Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol
title_short Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol
title_sort implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (pros) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1262-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gorlachmirjagianna implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol
AT schragetheresa implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol
AT bokemeyercarsten implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol
AT krogernicolaus implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol
AT mullervolkmar implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol
AT petersencordula implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol
AT betzchristianstephan implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol
AT krullandreas implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol
AT schulzholger implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol
AT bleichchristiane implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol