Cargando…
Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol
BACKGROUND: The successful implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical routine faces many challenges, first and foremost the lack of consideration thereof in the patient care process. The aim of this study will be to first identify relevant barriers and facilitators and then desig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1262-2 |
_version_ | 1783484514237939712 |
---|---|
author | Görlach, Mirja Gianna Schrage, Theresa Bokemeyer, Carsten Kröger, Nicolaus Müller, Volkmar Petersen, Cordula Betz, Christian Stephan Krüll, Andreas Schulz, Holger Bleich, Christiane |
author_facet | Görlach, Mirja Gianna Schrage, Theresa Bokemeyer, Carsten Kröger, Nicolaus Müller, Volkmar Petersen, Cordula Betz, Christian Stephan Krüll, Andreas Schulz, Holger Bleich, Christiane |
author_sort | Görlach, Mirja Gianna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The successful implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical routine faces many challenges, first and foremost the lack of consideration thereof in the patient care process. The aim of this study will be to first identify relevant barriers and facilitators and then design suitable implementation strategies which will be evaluated to improve the effectiveness of a PRO measure assessment in inpatient and outpatient cancer routine care. METHODS: During the preparation phase, interviews with oncological patients (N = 28) and medical staff (N = 4) as well as focus groups with medical staff (N = 18) across five different departments caring for cancer patients were conducted. On the basis of these, qualitative content analysis revealed relevant barriers and facilitators for implementation of PROs in cancer care. Subsequently, implementation strategies and a model of implementation were developed. In the study phase, implementation strategies will be evaluated based on nine different implementation outcomes in five different oncological clinics. Evaluation of the implementation process will take place during three months in each clinic and data will be conducted pre, while and post implementation of the PRO measure. Therefore a sample size of 60 participants of whom 30 staff members and 30 participants will be questioned using existing and newly developed implementation outcome evaluation instruments. DISCUSSION: Key to improving the effectiveness of PRO assessment in the time-critical clinical environment is the utilization of easy-to-use, electronic PRO questionnaires directly linked to patients’ records thereby improving consideration of PROs in patient care. In order to validate the effectiveness of this implementation process further, an evaluation parallel to implementation following an observational study design with a mixed-methods approach will be conducted. This study could contribute to the development of adequate evaluation processes of implementation of PROs to foster sustainable integration of PRO measures into routine cancer care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6941251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69412512020-01-06 Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol Görlach, Mirja Gianna Schrage, Theresa Bokemeyer, Carsten Kröger, Nicolaus Müller, Volkmar Petersen, Cordula Betz, Christian Stephan Krüll, Andreas Schulz, Holger Bleich, Christiane Health Qual Life Outcomes Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The successful implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical routine faces many challenges, first and foremost the lack of consideration thereof in the patient care process. The aim of this study will be to first identify relevant barriers and facilitators and then design suitable implementation strategies which will be evaluated to improve the effectiveness of a PRO measure assessment in inpatient and outpatient cancer routine care. METHODS: During the preparation phase, interviews with oncological patients (N = 28) and medical staff (N = 4) as well as focus groups with medical staff (N = 18) across five different departments caring for cancer patients were conducted. On the basis of these, qualitative content analysis revealed relevant barriers and facilitators for implementation of PROs in cancer care. Subsequently, implementation strategies and a model of implementation were developed. In the study phase, implementation strategies will be evaluated based on nine different implementation outcomes in five different oncological clinics. Evaluation of the implementation process will take place during three months in each clinic and data will be conducted pre, while and post implementation of the PRO measure. Therefore a sample size of 60 participants of whom 30 staff members and 30 participants will be questioned using existing and newly developed implementation outcome evaluation instruments. DISCUSSION: Key to improving the effectiveness of PRO assessment in the time-critical clinical environment is the utilization of easy-to-use, electronic PRO questionnaires directly linked to patients’ records thereby improving consideration of PROs in patient care. In order to validate the effectiveness of this implementation process further, an evaluation parallel to implementation following an observational study design with a mixed-methods approach will be conducted. This study could contribute to the development of adequate evaluation processes of implementation of PROs to foster sustainable integration of PRO measures into routine cancer care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/). BioMed Central 2020-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6941251/ /pubmed/31898544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1262-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Görlach, Mirja Gianna Schrage, Theresa Bokemeyer, Carsten Kröger, Nicolaus Müller, Volkmar Petersen, Cordula Betz, Christian Stephan Krüll, Andreas Schulz, Holger Bleich, Christiane Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol |
title | Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol |
title_full | Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol |
title_fullStr | Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol |
title_short | Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol |
title_sort | implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (pros) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1262-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gorlachmirjagianna implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol AT schragetheresa implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol AT bokemeyercarsten implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol AT krogernicolaus implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol AT mullervolkmar implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol AT petersencordula implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol AT betzchristianstephan implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol AT krullandreas implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol AT schulzholger implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol AT bleichchristiane implementationanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesprosinoncologicalroutinecareanobservationalstudyprotocol |