Cargando…

Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has a high recurrent infection rate. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been used successfully to treat recurrent CDI, but much remains unknown about the human gut microbiota response to replacement therapies. In this study, antibiotic-me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moura, Ines B., Normington, Charmaine, Ewin, Duncan, Clark, Emma, Wilcox, Mark H., Buckley, Anthony M., Chilton, Caroline H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1669-2
_version_ 1783484518845382656
author Moura, Ines B.
Normington, Charmaine
Ewin, Duncan
Clark, Emma
Wilcox, Mark H.
Buckley, Anthony M.
Chilton, Caroline H.
author_facet Moura, Ines B.
Normington, Charmaine
Ewin, Duncan
Clark, Emma
Wilcox, Mark H.
Buckley, Anthony M.
Chilton, Caroline H.
author_sort Moura, Ines B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has a high recurrent infection rate. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been used successfully to treat recurrent CDI, but much remains unknown about the human gut microbiota response to replacement therapies. In this study, antibiotic-mediated dysbiosis of gut microbiota and bacterial growth dynamics were investigated by two quantitative methods: real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and direct culture enumeration, in triple-stage chemostat models of the human colon. Three in vitro models were exposed to clindamycin to induce simulated CDI. All models were treated with vancomycin, and two received an FMT. Populations of total bacteria, Bacteroides spp., Lactobacillus spp., Enterococcus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., C. difficile, and Enterobacteriaceae were monitored using both methods. Total clostridia were monitored by selective culture. Using qPCR analysis, we additionally monitored populations of Prevotella spp., Clostridium coccoides group, and Clostridium leptum group. RESULTS: Both methods showed an exacerbation of disruption of the colonic microbiota following vancomycin (and earlier clindamycin) exposure, and a quicker recovery (within 4 days) of the bacterial populations in the models that received the FMT. C. difficile proliferation, consistent with CDI, was also observed by both qPCR and culture. Pearson correlation coefficient showed an association between results varying from 98% for Bacteroides spp., to 62% for Enterobacteriaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Generally, a good correlation was observed between qPCR and bacterial culture. Overall, the molecular assays offer results in real-time, important for treatment efficacy, and allow the monitoring of additional microbiota groups. However, individual quantification of some genera (e.g. clostridia) might not be possible without selective culture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6941270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69412702020-01-06 Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon Moura, Ines B. Normington, Charmaine Ewin, Duncan Clark, Emma Wilcox, Mark H. Buckley, Anthony M. Chilton, Caroline H. BMC Microbiol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has a high recurrent infection rate. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been used successfully to treat recurrent CDI, but much remains unknown about the human gut microbiota response to replacement therapies. In this study, antibiotic-mediated dysbiosis of gut microbiota and bacterial growth dynamics were investigated by two quantitative methods: real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and direct culture enumeration, in triple-stage chemostat models of the human colon. Three in vitro models were exposed to clindamycin to induce simulated CDI. All models were treated with vancomycin, and two received an FMT. Populations of total bacteria, Bacteroides spp., Lactobacillus spp., Enterococcus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., C. difficile, and Enterobacteriaceae were monitored using both methods. Total clostridia were monitored by selective culture. Using qPCR analysis, we additionally monitored populations of Prevotella spp., Clostridium coccoides group, and Clostridium leptum group. RESULTS: Both methods showed an exacerbation of disruption of the colonic microbiota following vancomycin (and earlier clindamycin) exposure, and a quicker recovery (within 4 days) of the bacterial populations in the models that received the FMT. C. difficile proliferation, consistent with CDI, was also observed by both qPCR and culture. Pearson correlation coefficient showed an association between results varying from 98% for Bacteroides spp., to 62% for Enterobacteriaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Generally, a good correlation was observed between qPCR and bacterial culture. Overall, the molecular assays offer results in real-time, important for treatment efficacy, and allow the monitoring of additional microbiota groups. However, individual quantification of some genera (e.g. clostridia) might not be possible without selective culture. BioMed Central 2020-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6941270/ /pubmed/31898476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1669-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Moura, Ines B.
Normington, Charmaine
Ewin, Duncan
Clark, Emma
Wilcox, Mark H.
Buckley, Anthony M.
Chilton, Caroline H.
Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon
title Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon
title_full Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon
title_fullStr Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon
title_full_unstemmed Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon
title_short Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon
title_sort method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1669-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mourainesb methodcomparisonforthedirectenumerationofbacterialspeciesusingachemostatmodelofthehumancolon
AT normingtoncharmaine methodcomparisonforthedirectenumerationofbacterialspeciesusingachemostatmodelofthehumancolon
AT ewinduncan methodcomparisonforthedirectenumerationofbacterialspeciesusingachemostatmodelofthehumancolon
AT clarkemma methodcomparisonforthedirectenumerationofbacterialspeciesusingachemostatmodelofthehumancolon
AT wilcoxmarkh methodcomparisonforthedirectenumerationofbacterialspeciesusingachemostatmodelofthehumancolon
AT buckleyanthonym methodcomparisonforthedirectenumerationofbacterialspeciesusingachemostatmodelofthehumancolon
AT chiltoncarolineh methodcomparisonforthedirectenumerationofbacterialspeciesusingachemostatmodelofthehumancolon