Cargando…
Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically challenging procedure rarely associated with severe postprocedure complications. Hormonal changes during pregnancy promote cholelithiasis, but there are limited clinical data available on the outcomes of ERCP in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31744939 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_92_19 |
_version_ | 1783484555409227776 |
---|---|
author | Azab, Mohamed Bharadwaj, Shishira Jayaraj, Mahendran Hong, Annie S. Solaimani, Pejman Mubder, Mohamad Yeom, Hyeyoung Yoo, Ji Won Volk, Michael L. |
author_facet | Azab, Mohamed Bharadwaj, Shishira Jayaraj, Mahendran Hong, Annie S. Solaimani, Pejman Mubder, Mohamad Yeom, Hyeyoung Yoo, Ji Won Volk, Michael L. |
author_sort | Azab, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically challenging procedure rarely associated with severe postprocedure complications. Hormonal changes during pregnancy promote cholelithiasis, but there are limited clinical data available on the outcomes of ERCP in pregnant women. ERCP techniques without irradiation were recently introduced as potential alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety of ERCP in pregnancy and to compare outcomes of radiation versus nonradiation ERCP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Medline/Ovid, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through April 18(th), 2018 using PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines identified 27 studies reporting the outcomes of ERCP in pregnancy. Random effects pooled event rate and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Heterogeneity was measured by I(2), and meta-regression analysis was conducted. Adverse outcomes were divided into fetal, maternal pregnancy-related, and maternal nonpregnancy-related. RESULTS: In all, 27 studies reporting on 1,307 pregnant patients who underwent ERCP were identified. Median age was 27.1 years. All results were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The pooled event rate for overall adverse outcomes was 15.9% (95% CI = 0.132–0.191) in all studies combined, 17.6% (95% CI = 0.109–0.272) in nonradiation ERCP (NR-ERCP) subgroup and 21.6% (95% CI = 0.154–0.294) in radiation ERCP subgroup. There was no significant difference in the pooled event rate for fetal adverse outcomes in NR-ERCP 6.2% (95% CI = 0.027–0.137) versus 5.2% (95% CI = 0.026–0.101) in radiation ERCP group. There was no significant difference in maternal pregnancy-related adverse outcome event rate between NR-ERCP (8.4%) (95% CI = 0.038–0.173) and radiation ERCP (7.1%) (95% CI = 0.039–0.125). Maternal nonpregnancy-related adverse outcome event rate in NR-ERCP was 7.6% (95% CI = 0.038–0.145), which was half the event rate in radiation ERCP group of 14.9% (95% CI = 0.102–0.211). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP done by experienced endoscopists is a safe procedure during pregnancy. Radiation-free techniques appear to reduce the rates of nonpregnancy-related complications, but not of fetal and pregnancy-related complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6941455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69414552020-01-10 Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Azab, Mohamed Bharadwaj, Shishira Jayaraj, Mahendran Hong, Annie S. Solaimani, Pejman Mubder, Mohamad Yeom, Hyeyoung Yoo, Ji Won Volk, Michael L. Saudi J Gastroenterol Systematic Review/Meta Analysis BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically challenging procedure rarely associated with severe postprocedure complications. Hormonal changes during pregnancy promote cholelithiasis, but there are limited clinical data available on the outcomes of ERCP in pregnant women. ERCP techniques without irradiation were recently introduced as potential alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety of ERCP in pregnancy and to compare outcomes of radiation versus nonradiation ERCP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Medline/Ovid, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through April 18(th), 2018 using PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines identified 27 studies reporting the outcomes of ERCP in pregnancy. Random effects pooled event rate and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Heterogeneity was measured by I(2), and meta-regression analysis was conducted. Adverse outcomes were divided into fetal, maternal pregnancy-related, and maternal nonpregnancy-related. RESULTS: In all, 27 studies reporting on 1,307 pregnant patients who underwent ERCP were identified. Median age was 27.1 years. All results were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The pooled event rate for overall adverse outcomes was 15.9% (95% CI = 0.132–0.191) in all studies combined, 17.6% (95% CI = 0.109–0.272) in nonradiation ERCP (NR-ERCP) subgroup and 21.6% (95% CI = 0.154–0.294) in radiation ERCP subgroup. There was no significant difference in the pooled event rate for fetal adverse outcomes in NR-ERCP 6.2% (95% CI = 0.027–0.137) versus 5.2% (95% CI = 0.026–0.101) in radiation ERCP group. There was no significant difference in maternal pregnancy-related adverse outcome event rate between NR-ERCP (8.4%) (95% CI = 0.038–0.173) and radiation ERCP (7.1%) (95% CI = 0.039–0.125). Maternal nonpregnancy-related adverse outcome event rate in NR-ERCP was 7.6% (95% CI = 0.038–0.145), which was half the event rate in radiation ERCP group of 14.9% (95% CI = 0.102–0.211). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP done by experienced endoscopists is a safe procedure during pregnancy. Radiation-free techniques appear to reduce the rates of nonpregnancy-related complications, but not of fetal and pregnancy-related complications. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6941455/ /pubmed/31744939 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_92_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review/Meta Analysis Azab, Mohamed Bharadwaj, Shishira Jayaraj, Mahendran Hong, Annie S. Solaimani, Pejman Mubder, Mohamad Yeom, Hyeyoung Yoo, Ji Won Volk, Michael L. Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review/Meta Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31744939 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_92_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT azabmohamed safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bharadwajshishira safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jayarajmahendran safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hongannies safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT solaimanipejman safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mubdermohamad safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yeomhyeyoung safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yoojiwon safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT volkmichaell safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |