Cargando…

Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically challenging procedure rarely associated with severe postprocedure complications. Hormonal changes during pregnancy promote cholelithiasis, but there are limited clinical data available on the outcomes of ERCP in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azab, Mohamed, Bharadwaj, Shishira, Jayaraj, Mahendran, Hong, Annie S., Solaimani, Pejman, Mubder, Mohamad, Yeom, Hyeyoung, Yoo, Ji Won, Volk, Michael L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31744939
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_92_19
_version_ 1783484555409227776
author Azab, Mohamed
Bharadwaj, Shishira
Jayaraj, Mahendran
Hong, Annie S.
Solaimani, Pejman
Mubder, Mohamad
Yeom, Hyeyoung
Yoo, Ji Won
Volk, Michael L.
author_facet Azab, Mohamed
Bharadwaj, Shishira
Jayaraj, Mahendran
Hong, Annie S.
Solaimani, Pejman
Mubder, Mohamad
Yeom, Hyeyoung
Yoo, Ji Won
Volk, Michael L.
author_sort Azab, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically challenging procedure rarely associated with severe postprocedure complications. Hormonal changes during pregnancy promote cholelithiasis, but there are limited clinical data available on the outcomes of ERCP in pregnant women. ERCP techniques without irradiation were recently introduced as potential alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety of ERCP in pregnancy and to compare outcomes of radiation versus nonradiation ERCP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Medline/Ovid, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through April 18(th), 2018 using PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines identified 27 studies reporting the outcomes of ERCP in pregnancy. Random effects pooled event rate and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Heterogeneity was measured by I(2), and meta-regression analysis was conducted. Adverse outcomes were divided into fetal, maternal pregnancy-related, and maternal nonpregnancy-related. RESULTS: In all, 27 studies reporting on 1,307 pregnant patients who underwent ERCP were identified. Median age was 27.1 years. All results were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The pooled event rate for overall adverse outcomes was 15.9% (95% CI = 0.132–0.191) in all studies combined, 17.6% (95% CI = 0.109–0.272) in nonradiation ERCP (NR-ERCP) subgroup and 21.6% (95% CI = 0.154–0.294) in radiation ERCP subgroup. There was no significant difference in the pooled event rate for fetal adverse outcomes in NR-ERCP 6.2% (95% CI = 0.027–0.137) versus 5.2% (95% CI = 0.026–0.101) in radiation ERCP group. There was no significant difference in maternal pregnancy-related adverse outcome event rate between NR-ERCP (8.4%) (95% CI = 0.038–0.173) and radiation ERCP (7.1%) (95% CI = 0.039–0.125). Maternal nonpregnancy-related adverse outcome event rate in NR-ERCP was 7.6% (95% CI = 0.038–0.145), which was half the event rate in radiation ERCP group of 14.9% (95% CI = 0.102–0.211). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP done by experienced endoscopists is a safe procedure during pregnancy. Radiation-free techniques appear to reduce the rates of nonpregnancy-related complications, but not of fetal and pregnancy-related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6941455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69414552020-01-10 Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Azab, Mohamed Bharadwaj, Shishira Jayaraj, Mahendran Hong, Annie S. Solaimani, Pejman Mubder, Mohamad Yeom, Hyeyoung Yoo, Ji Won Volk, Michael L. Saudi J Gastroenterol Systematic Review/Meta Analysis BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically challenging procedure rarely associated with severe postprocedure complications. Hormonal changes during pregnancy promote cholelithiasis, but there are limited clinical data available on the outcomes of ERCP in pregnant women. ERCP techniques without irradiation were recently introduced as potential alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety of ERCP in pregnancy and to compare outcomes of radiation versus nonradiation ERCP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Medline/Ovid, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through April 18(th), 2018 using PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines identified 27 studies reporting the outcomes of ERCP in pregnancy. Random effects pooled event rate and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Heterogeneity was measured by I(2), and meta-regression analysis was conducted. Adverse outcomes were divided into fetal, maternal pregnancy-related, and maternal nonpregnancy-related. RESULTS: In all, 27 studies reporting on 1,307 pregnant patients who underwent ERCP were identified. Median age was 27.1 years. All results were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The pooled event rate for overall adverse outcomes was 15.9% (95% CI = 0.132–0.191) in all studies combined, 17.6% (95% CI = 0.109–0.272) in nonradiation ERCP (NR-ERCP) subgroup and 21.6% (95% CI = 0.154–0.294) in radiation ERCP subgroup. There was no significant difference in the pooled event rate for fetal adverse outcomes in NR-ERCP 6.2% (95% CI = 0.027–0.137) versus 5.2% (95% CI = 0.026–0.101) in radiation ERCP group. There was no significant difference in maternal pregnancy-related adverse outcome event rate between NR-ERCP (8.4%) (95% CI = 0.038–0.173) and radiation ERCP (7.1%) (95% CI = 0.039–0.125). Maternal nonpregnancy-related adverse outcome event rate in NR-ERCP was 7.6% (95% CI = 0.038–0.145), which was half the event rate in radiation ERCP group of 14.9% (95% CI = 0.102–0.211). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP done by experienced endoscopists is a safe procedure during pregnancy. Radiation-free techniques appear to reduce the rates of nonpregnancy-related complications, but not of fetal and pregnancy-related complications. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6941455/ /pubmed/31744939 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_92_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Systematic Review/Meta Analysis
Azab, Mohamed
Bharadwaj, Shishira
Jayaraj, Mahendran
Hong, Annie S.
Solaimani, Pejman
Mubder, Mohamad
Yeom, Hyeyoung
Yoo, Ji Won
Volk, Michael L.
Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review/Meta Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31744939
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_92_19
work_keys_str_mv AT azabmohamed safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bharadwajshishira safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jayarajmahendran safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hongannies safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT solaimanipejman safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mubdermohamad safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yeomhyeyoung safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yoojiwon safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT volkmichaell safetyofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyercpinpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis