Cargando…

Prediction of Left Ventricular Mechanics Using Machine Learning

The goal of this paper was to provide a real-time left ventricular (LV) mechanics simulator using machine learning (ML). Finite element (FE) simulations were conducted for the LV with different material properties to obtain a training set. A hyperelastic fiber-reinforced material model was used to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dabiri, Yaghoub, Van der Velden, Alex, Sack, Kevin L., Choy, Jenny S., Kassab, Ghassan S., Guccione, Julius M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31903394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2019.00117
_version_ 1783484582443614208
author Dabiri, Yaghoub
Van der Velden, Alex
Sack, Kevin L.
Choy, Jenny S.
Kassab, Ghassan S.
Guccione, Julius M.
author_facet Dabiri, Yaghoub
Van der Velden, Alex
Sack, Kevin L.
Choy, Jenny S.
Kassab, Ghassan S.
Guccione, Julius M.
author_sort Dabiri, Yaghoub
collection PubMed
description The goal of this paper was to provide a real-time left ventricular (LV) mechanics simulator using machine learning (ML). Finite element (FE) simulations were conducted for the LV with different material properties to obtain a training set. A hyperelastic fiber-reinforced material model was used to describe the passive behavior of the myocardium during diastole. The active behavior of the heart resulting from myofiber contractions was added to the passive tissue during systole. The active and passive properties govern the LV constitutive equation. These mechanical properties were altered using optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments to obtain training FE models with varied active properties (volume and pressure predictions) and varied passive properties (stress predictions). For prediction of LV pressures, we used eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost) and Cubist, and XGBoost was used for predictions of LV pressures, volumes as well as LV stresses. The LV pressure and volume results obtained from ML were similar to FE computations. The ML results could capture the shape of LV pressure as well as LV pressure-volume loops. The results predicted by Cubist were smoother than those from XGBoost. The mean absolute errors were as follows: XGBoost volume: 1.734 ± 0.584 ml, XGBoost pressure: 1.544 ± 0.298 mmHg, Cubist volume: 1.495 ± 0.260 ml, Cubist pressure: 1.623 ± 0.191 mmHg, myofiber stress: 0.334 ± 0.228 kPa, cross myofiber stress: 0.075 ± 0.024 kPa, and shear stress: 0.050 ± 0.032 kPa. The simulation results show ML can predict LV mechanics much faster than the FE method. The ML model can be used as a tool to predict LV behavior. Training of our ML model based on a large group of subjects can improve its predictability for real world applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6941671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69416712020-01-03 Prediction of Left Ventricular Mechanics Using Machine Learning Dabiri, Yaghoub Van der Velden, Alex Sack, Kevin L. Choy, Jenny S. Kassab, Ghassan S. Guccione, Julius M. Front Phys Article The goal of this paper was to provide a real-time left ventricular (LV) mechanics simulator using machine learning (ML). Finite element (FE) simulations were conducted for the LV with different material properties to obtain a training set. A hyperelastic fiber-reinforced material model was used to describe the passive behavior of the myocardium during diastole. The active behavior of the heart resulting from myofiber contractions was added to the passive tissue during systole. The active and passive properties govern the LV constitutive equation. These mechanical properties were altered using optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments to obtain training FE models with varied active properties (volume and pressure predictions) and varied passive properties (stress predictions). For prediction of LV pressures, we used eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost) and Cubist, and XGBoost was used for predictions of LV pressures, volumes as well as LV stresses. The LV pressure and volume results obtained from ML were similar to FE computations. The ML results could capture the shape of LV pressure as well as LV pressure-volume loops. The results predicted by Cubist were smoother than those from XGBoost. The mean absolute errors were as follows: XGBoost volume: 1.734 ± 0.584 ml, XGBoost pressure: 1.544 ± 0.298 mmHg, Cubist volume: 1.495 ± 0.260 ml, Cubist pressure: 1.623 ± 0.191 mmHg, myofiber stress: 0.334 ± 0.228 kPa, cross myofiber stress: 0.075 ± 0.024 kPa, and shear stress: 0.050 ± 0.032 kPa. The simulation results show ML can predict LV mechanics much faster than the FE method. The ML model can be used as a tool to predict LV behavior. Training of our ML model based on a large group of subjects can improve its predictability for real world applications. 2019-09-06 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6941671/ /pubmed/31903394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2019.00117 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
spellingShingle Article
Dabiri, Yaghoub
Van der Velden, Alex
Sack, Kevin L.
Choy, Jenny S.
Kassab, Ghassan S.
Guccione, Julius M.
Prediction of Left Ventricular Mechanics Using Machine Learning
title Prediction of Left Ventricular Mechanics Using Machine Learning
title_full Prediction of Left Ventricular Mechanics Using Machine Learning
title_fullStr Prediction of Left Ventricular Mechanics Using Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Left Ventricular Mechanics Using Machine Learning
title_short Prediction of Left Ventricular Mechanics Using Machine Learning
title_sort prediction of left ventricular mechanics using machine learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31903394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2019.00117
work_keys_str_mv AT dabiriyaghoub predictionofleftventricularmechanicsusingmachinelearning
AT vanderveldenalex predictionofleftventricularmechanicsusingmachinelearning
AT sackkevinl predictionofleftventricularmechanicsusingmachinelearning
AT choyjennys predictionofleftventricularmechanicsusingmachinelearning
AT kassabghassans predictionofleftventricularmechanicsusingmachinelearning
AT guccionejuliusm predictionofleftventricularmechanicsusingmachinelearning