Cargando…

Three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of digital dental models constructed from cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans of polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions and cast scan models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pair of PVS impressions was obtained from 20 subjects an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jin-Yi, Kim, Dasomi, Han, Sang-Sun, Yu, Hyung-Seog, Cha, Jung-Yul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915610
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.4.257
_version_ 1783484606497947648
author Park, Jin-Yi
Kim, Dasomi
Han, Sang-Sun
Yu, Hyung-Seog
Cha, Jung-Yul
author_facet Park, Jin-Yi
Kim, Dasomi
Han, Sang-Sun
Yu, Hyung-Seog
Cha, Jung-Yul
author_sort Park, Jin-Yi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of digital dental models constructed from cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans of polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions and cast scan models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pair of PVS impressions was obtained from 20 subjects and scanned using CBCT (resolution, 0.1 mm). A cast scan model was constructed by scanning the gypsum model using a model scanner. After reconstruction of the digital models, the mesio-distal width of each tooth, inter-canine width, and inter-molar width were measured, and the Bolton ratios were calculated and compared. The 2 models were superimposed and the difference between the models was measured using 3-dimensional analysis. RESULTS: The range of mean error between the cast scan model and the CBCT scan model was −0.15 mm to 0.13 mm in the mesio-distal width of the teeth and 0.03 mm to 0.42 mm in the width analysis. The differences in the Bolton ratios between the cast scan models and CBCT scan models were 0.87 (anterior ratio) and 0.72 (overall ratio), with no significant difference (P>0.05). The mean maxillary and mandibular difference when the cast scan model and the CBCT scan model were superimposed was 53 µm. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in most of the measurements. The maximum tooth size difference was 0.15 mm, and the average difference in model overlap was 53 µm. Digital models produced by scanning impressions at a high resolution using CBCT can be used in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6941835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69418352020-01-08 Three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models Park, Jin-Yi Kim, Dasomi Han, Sang-Sun Yu, Hyung-Seog Cha, Jung-Yul Imaging Sci Dent Original Article PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of digital dental models constructed from cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans of polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions and cast scan models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pair of PVS impressions was obtained from 20 subjects and scanned using CBCT (resolution, 0.1 mm). A cast scan model was constructed by scanning the gypsum model using a model scanner. After reconstruction of the digital models, the mesio-distal width of each tooth, inter-canine width, and inter-molar width were measured, and the Bolton ratios were calculated and compared. The 2 models were superimposed and the difference between the models was measured using 3-dimensional analysis. RESULTS: The range of mean error between the cast scan model and the CBCT scan model was −0.15 mm to 0.13 mm in the mesio-distal width of the teeth and 0.03 mm to 0.42 mm in the width analysis. The differences in the Bolton ratios between the cast scan models and CBCT scan models were 0.87 (anterior ratio) and 0.72 (overall ratio), with no significant difference (P>0.05). The mean maxillary and mandibular difference when the cast scan model and the CBCT scan model were superimposed was 53 µm. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in most of the measurements. The maximum tooth size difference was 0.15 mm, and the average difference in model overlap was 53 µm. Digital models produced by scanning impressions at a high resolution using CBCT can be used in clinical practice. Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2019-12 2019-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6941835/ /pubmed/31915610 http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.4.257 Text en Copyright © 2019 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Jin-Yi
Kim, Dasomi
Han, Sang-Sun
Yu, Hyung-Seog
Cha, Jung-Yul
Three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models
title Three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models
title_full Three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models
title_fullStr Three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models
title_short Three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models
title_sort three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915610
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.4.257
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjinyi threedimensionalcomparisonof2digitalmodelsobtainedfromconebeamcomputedtomographicscansofpolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionsandplastermodels
AT kimdasomi threedimensionalcomparisonof2digitalmodelsobtainedfromconebeamcomputedtomographicscansofpolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionsandplastermodels
AT hansangsun threedimensionalcomparisonof2digitalmodelsobtainedfromconebeamcomputedtomographicscansofpolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionsandplastermodels
AT yuhyungseog threedimensionalcomparisonof2digitalmodelsobtainedfromconebeamcomputedtomographicscansofpolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionsandplastermodels
AT chajungyul threedimensionalcomparisonof2digitalmodelsobtainedfromconebeamcomputedtomographicscansofpolyvinylsiloxaneimpressionsandplastermodels