Cargando…

Rituximab utilization for approved and off‐label nononcology indications and patients’ experiences with the Patient Alert Card

This study used retrospective chart review and survey data to evaluate: (1) off‐label use of rituximab (MabThera(®)/Rituxan(®)) in autoimmune conditions and (2) patients’ receipt and knowledge of the Patient Alert Card (PAC), a risk minimization measure for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarsour, Khaled, Beckley‐Kartey, Senam, Melega, Simone, Odueyungbo, Adefowope, Kirchner, Petra, Khalife, Natasha, Bangs, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.555
_version_ 1783484614548914176
author Sarsour, Khaled
Beckley‐Kartey, Senam
Melega, Simone
Odueyungbo, Adefowope
Kirchner, Petra
Khalife, Natasha
Bangs, Joanne
author_facet Sarsour, Khaled
Beckley‐Kartey, Senam
Melega, Simone
Odueyungbo, Adefowope
Kirchner, Petra
Khalife, Natasha
Bangs, Joanne
author_sort Sarsour, Khaled
collection PubMed
description This study used retrospective chart review and survey data to evaluate: (1) off‐label use of rituximab (MabThera(®)/Rituxan(®)) in autoimmune conditions and (2) patients’ receipt and knowledge of the Patient Alert Card (PAC), a risk minimization measure for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and serious infections. Anonymized patient data were collected from infusion centers in Europe from December 2015 to July 2017. Adults receiving rituximab in the same centers were provided a self‐administered survey. Outcomes included patterns of off‐label rituximab use for nononcology indications, and evaluation of patients’ receipt and knowledge of the PAC and its impact. Of 1012 patients in the retrospective chart review, 70.2% received rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis or granulomatosis with polyangiitis/microscopic polyangiitis, and 29.8% received rituximab off label. Among 524 survey participants, 32.8% reported receiving the PAC, 59.3% reported not receiving the PAC and 7.9% did not know whether they received the PAC. A total of 72.4% of patients reported that they were unaware that some patients receiving rituximab experience PML. A higher proportion of PAC recipients identified PML as a potential risk of rituximab than nonrecipients (37.8% vs 19.9%); 58.3% of PAC recipients had poor awareness of PML. Most PAC recipients (90.0%) and nonrecipients (85.5%) correctly answered that they should seek medical attention for infection symptoms. In conclusion, approximately 30% of patients received off‐label rituximab. Most patients reported not receiving the PAC or having knowledge of PML but demonstrated understanding of the recommended action in the event of infection symptoms, regardless of PAC receipt.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6941895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69418952020-01-07 Rituximab utilization for approved and off‐label nononcology indications and patients’ experiences with the Patient Alert Card Sarsour, Khaled Beckley‐Kartey, Senam Melega, Simone Odueyungbo, Adefowope Kirchner, Petra Khalife, Natasha Bangs, Joanne Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles This study used retrospective chart review and survey data to evaluate: (1) off‐label use of rituximab (MabThera(®)/Rituxan(®)) in autoimmune conditions and (2) patients’ receipt and knowledge of the Patient Alert Card (PAC), a risk minimization measure for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and serious infections. Anonymized patient data were collected from infusion centers in Europe from December 2015 to July 2017. Adults receiving rituximab in the same centers were provided a self‐administered survey. Outcomes included patterns of off‐label rituximab use for nononcology indications, and evaluation of patients’ receipt and knowledge of the PAC and its impact. Of 1012 patients in the retrospective chart review, 70.2% received rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis or granulomatosis with polyangiitis/microscopic polyangiitis, and 29.8% received rituximab off label. Among 524 survey participants, 32.8% reported receiving the PAC, 59.3% reported not receiving the PAC and 7.9% did not know whether they received the PAC. A total of 72.4% of patients reported that they were unaware that some patients receiving rituximab experience PML. A higher proportion of PAC recipients identified PML as a potential risk of rituximab than nonrecipients (37.8% vs 19.9%); 58.3% of PAC recipients had poor awareness of PML. Most PAC recipients (90.0%) and nonrecipients (85.5%) correctly answered that they should seek medical attention for infection symptoms. In conclusion, approximately 30% of patients received off‐label rituximab. Most patients reported not receiving the PAC or having knowledge of PML but demonstrated understanding of the recommended action in the event of infection symptoms, regardless of PAC receipt. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6941895/ /pubmed/31911839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.555 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sarsour, Khaled
Beckley‐Kartey, Senam
Melega, Simone
Odueyungbo, Adefowope
Kirchner, Petra
Khalife, Natasha
Bangs, Joanne
Rituximab utilization for approved and off‐label nononcology indications and patients’ experiences with the Patient Alert Card
title Rituximab utilization for approved and off‐label nononcology indications and patients’ experiences with the Patient Alert Card
title_full Rituximab utilization for approved and off‐label nononcology indications and patients’ experiences with the Patient Alert Card
title_fullStr Rituximab utilization for approved and off‐label nononcology indications and patients’ experiences with the Patient Alert Card
title_full_unstemmed Rituximab utilization for approved and off‐label nononcology indications and patients’ experiences with the Patient Alert Card
title_short Rituximab utilization for approved and off‐label nononcology indications and patients’ experiences with the Patient Alert Card
title_sort rituximab utilization for approved and off‐label nononcology indications and patients’ experiences with the patient alert card
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6941895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.555
work_keys_str_mv AT sarsourkhaled rituximabutilizationforapprovedandofflabelnononcologyindicationsandpatientsexperienceswiththepatientalertcard
AT beckleykarteysenam rituximabutilizationforapprovedandofflabelnononcologyindicationsandpatientsexperienceswiththepatientalertcard
AT melegasimone rituximabutilizationforapprovedandofflabelnononcologyindicationsandpatientsexperienceswiththepatientalertcard
AT odueyungboadefowope rituximabutilizationforapprovedandofflabelnononcologyindicationsandpatientsexperienceswiththepatientalertcard
AT kirchnerpetra rituximabutilizationforapprovedandofflabelnononcologyindicationsandpatientsexperienceswiththepatientalertcard
AT khalifenatasha rituximabutilizationforapprovedandofflabelnononcologyindicationsandpatientsexperienceswiththepatientalertcard
AT bangsjoanne rituximabutilizationforapprovedandofflabelnononcologyindicationsandpatientsexperienceswiththepatientalertcard