Cargando…

Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application

Change of direction (CoD) has been indicated as a key mechanism in the occurrence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury during invasion sports. Despite these associations, assessments of knee function in athletic populations at the time of return to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLr) hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marques, Joao Beleboni, Paul, Darren James, Graham-Smith, Phil, Read, Paul James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01189-4
_version_ 1783484640742342656
author Marques, Joao Beleboni
Paul, Darren James
Graham-Smith, Phil
Read, Paul James
author_facet Marques, Joao Beleboni
Paul, Darren James
Graham-Smith, Phil
Read, Paul James
author_sort Marques, Joao Beleboni
collection PubMed
description Change of direction (CoD) has been indicated as a key mechanism in the occurrence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury during invasion sports. Despite these associations, assessments of knee function in athletic populations at the time of return to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLr) have often focused on strength and single-leg hop tests, with a paucity of evidence to describe the CoD characteristics. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review was to describe the movement strategies exhibited following ACLr during CoD tasks and to critically analyze the range of tests that have been used. Specifically, we examined their ability to identify between-limb deficits and individuals who display a heightened risk of secondary injury and/or reductions in their level of pre-injury performance. MEDLINE, PubMed and SPORT Discuss databases were used and 13 articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Examination of the available literature indicates that current field-based practices are not representative of relevant sport demands and are unable to effectively assess knee function following ACLr. Laboratory-based studies have identified residual deficits and altered movement strategies at the time of return to sport, and this in part may be related to risk of re-injury. However, these assessments exhibit inherent limitations and are not practically viable for monitoring progress during rehabilitation. Consequently, alternative solutions that are more-aligned with the multitude of factors occurring during CoD maneuvers in chaotic sports environments are warranted to allow practitioners to ‘bridge the gap’ between the laboratory and the sports field/court. This approach may facilitate a more informed decision-making process with the end goal being, a heightened ‘return to performance’ and a lower risk of re-injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6942029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69420292020-01-16 Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application Marques, Joao Beleboni Paul, Darren James Graham-Smith, Phil Read, Paul James Sports Med Review Article Change of direction (CoD) has been indicated as a key mechanism in the occurrence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury during invasion sports. Despite these associations, assessments of knee function in athletic populations at the time of return to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLr) have often focused on strength and single-leg hop tests, with a paucity of evidence to describe the CoD characteristics. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review was to describe the movement strategies exhibited following ACLr during CoD tasks and to critically analyze the range of tests that have been used. Specifically, we examined their ability to identify between-limb deficits and individuals who display a heightened risk of secondary injury and/or reductions in their level of pre-injury performance. MEDLINE, PubMed and SPORT Discuss databases were used and 13 articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Examination of the available literature indicates that current field-based practices are not representative of relevant sport demands and are unable to effectively assess knee function following ACLr. Laboratory-based studies have identified residual deficits and altered movement strategies at the time of return to sport, and this in part may be related to risk of re-injury. However, these assessments exhibit inherent limitations and are not practically viable for monitoring progress during rehabilitation. Consequently, alternative solutions that are more-aligned with the multitude of factors occurring during CoD maneuvers in chaotic sports environments are warranted to allow practitioners to ‘bridge the gap’ between the laboratory and the sports field/court. This approach may facilitate a more informed decision-making process with the end goal being, a heightened ‘return to performance’ and a lower risk of re-injury. Springer International Publishing 2019-09-17 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6942029/ /pubmed/31531768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01189-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Marques, Joao Beleboni
Paul, Darren James
Graham-Smith, Phil
Read, Paul James
Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application
title Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application
title_full Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application
title_fullStr Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application
title_full_unstemmed Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application
title_short Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application
title_sort change of direction assessment following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of current practice and considerations to enhance practical application
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01189-4
work_keys_str_mv AT marquesjoaobeleboni changeofdirectionassessmentfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionareviewofcurrentpracticeandconsiderationstoenhancepracticalapplication
AT pauldarrenjames changeofdirectionassessmentfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionareviewofcurrentpracticeandconsiderationstoenhancepracticalapplication
AT grahamsmithphil changeofdirectionassessmentfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionareviewofcurrentpracticeandconsiderationstoenhancepracticalapplication
AT readpauljames changeofdirectionassessmentfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionareviewofcurrentpracticeandconsiderationstoenhancepracticalapplication