Cargando…
Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences
The idea that liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) may be a general mechanism by which molecules in the complex cellular milieu may self-organize has generated much excitement and fervor in the cell biology community. While this concept is not new, its rise to preeminence has resulted in renewed in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31594803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.331520.119 |
_version_ | 1783484645782847488 |
---|---|
author | McSwiggen, David T. Mir, Mustafa Darzacq, Xavier Tjian, Robert |
author_facet | McSwiggen, David T. Mir, Mustafa Darzacq, Xavier Tjian, Robert |
author_sort | McSwiggen, David T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The idea that liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) may be a general mechanism by which molecules in the complex cellular milieu may self-organize has generated much excitement and fervor in the cell biology community. While this concept is not new, its rise to preeminence has resulted in renewed interest in the mechanisms that shape and drive diverse cellular self-assembly processes from gene expression to cell division to stress responses. In vitro biochemical data have been instrumental in deriving some of the fundamental principles and molecular grammar by which biological molecules may phase separate, and the molecular basis of these interactions. Definitive evidence is lacking as to whether the same principles apply in the physiological environment inside living cells. In this Perspective, we analyze the evidence supporting phase separation in vivo across multiple cellular processes. We find that the evidence for in vivo LLPS is often phenomenological and inadequate to discriminate between phase separation and other possible mechanisms. Moreover, the causal relationship and functional consequences of LLPS in vivo are even more elusive. We underscore the importance of performing quantitative measurements on proteins in their endogenous state and physiological abundance, as well as make recommendations for experiments that may yield more conclusive results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6942051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69420512020-01-16 Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences McSwiggen, David T. Mir, Mustafa Darzacq, Xavier Tjian, Robert Genes Dev Perspective The idea that liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) may be a general mechanism by which molecules in the complex cellular milieu may self-organize has generated much excitement and fervor in the cell biology community. While this concept is not new, its rise to preeminence has resulted in renewed interest in the mechanisms that shape and drive diverse cellular self-assembly processes from gene expression to cell division to stress responses. In vitro biochemical data have been instrumental in deriving some of the fundamental principles and molecular grammar by which biological molecules may phase separate, and the molecular basis of these interactions. Definitive evidence is lacking as to whether the same principles apply in the physiological environment inside living cells. In this Perspective, we analyze the evidence supporting phase separation in vivo across multiple cellular processes. We find that the evidence for in vivo LLPS is often phenomenological and inadequate to discriminate between phase separation and other possible mechanisms. Moreover, the causal relationship and functional consequences of LLPS in vivo are even more elusive. We underscore the importance of performing quantitative measurements on proteins in their endogenous state and physiological abundance, as well as make recommendations for experiments that may yield more conclusive results. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6942051/ /pubmed/31594803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.331520.119 Text en © 2019 McSwiggen et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article, published in Genes & Development, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Perspective McSwiggen, David T. Mir, Mustafa Darzacq, Xavier Tjian, Robert Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences |
title | Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences |
title_full | Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences |
title_fullStr | Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences |
title_short | Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences |
title_sort | evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31594803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.331520.119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcswiggendavidt evaluatingphaseseparationinlivecellsdiagnosiscaveatsandfunctionalconsequences AT mirmustafa evaluatingphaseseparationinlivecellsdiagnosiscaveatsandfunctionalconsequences AT darzacqxavier evaluatingphaseseparationinlivecellsdiagnosiscaveatsandfunctionalconsequences AT tjianrobert evaluatingphaseseparationinlivecellsdiagnosiscaveatsandfunctionalconsequences |