Cargando…

Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences

The idea that liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) may be a general mechanism by which molecules in the complex cellular milieu may self-organize has generated much excitement and fervor in the cell biology community. While this concept is not new, its rise to preeminence has resulted in renewed in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McSwiggen, David T., Mir, Mustafa, Darzacq, Xavier, Tjian, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31594803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.331520.119
_version_ 1783484645782847488
author McSwiggen, David T.
Mir, Mustafa
Darzacq, Xavier
Tjian, Robert
author_facet McSwiggen, David T.
Mir, Mustafa
Darzacq, Xavier
Tjian, Robert
author_sort McSwiggen, David T.
collection PubMed
description The idea that liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) may be a general mechanism by which molecules in the complex cellular milieu may self-organize has generated much excitement and fervor in the cell biology community. While this concept is not new, its rise to preeminence has resulted in renewed interest in the mechanisms that shape and drive diverse cellular self-assembly processes from gene expression to cell division to stress responses. In vitro biochemical data have been instrumental in deriving some of the fundamental principles and molecular grammar by which biological molecules may phase separate, and the molecular basis of these interactions. Definitive evidence is lacking as to whether the same principles apply in the physiological environment inside living cells. In this Perspective, we analyze the evidence supporting phase separation in vivo across multiple cellular processes. We find that the evidence for in vivo LLPS is often phenomenological and inadequate to discriminate between phase separation and other possible mechanisms. Moreover, the causal relationship and functional consequences of LLPS in vivo are even more elusive. We underscore the importance of performing quantitative measurements on proteins in their endogenous state and physiological abundance, as well as make recommendations for experiments that may yield more conclusive results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6942051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69420512020-01-16 Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences McSwiggen, David T. Mir, Mustafa Darzacq, Xavier Tjian, Robert Genes Dev Perspective The idea that liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) may be a general mechanism by which molecules in the complex cellular milieu may self-organize has generated much excitement and fervor in the cell biology community. While this concept is not new, its rise to preeminence has resulted in renewed interest in the mechanisms that shape and drive diverse cellular self-assembly processes from gene expression to cell division to stress responses. In vitro biochemical data have been instrumental in deriving some of the fundamental principles and molecular grammar by which biological molecules may phase separate, and the molecular basis of these interactions. Definitive evidence is lacking as to whether the same principles apply in the physiological environment inside living cells. In this Perspective, we analyze the evidence supporting phase separation in vivo across multiple cellular processes. We find that the evidence for in vivo LLPS is often phenomenological and inadequate to discriminate between phase separation and other possible mechanisms. Moreover, the causal relationship and functional consequences of LLPS in vivo are even more elusive. We underscore the importance of performing quantitative measurements on proteins in their endogenous state and physiological abundance, as well as make recommendations for experiments that may yield more conclusive results. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6942051/ /pubmed/31594803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.331520.119 Text en © 2019 McSwiggen et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article, published in Genes & Development, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Perspective
McSwiggen, David T.
Mir, Mustafa
Darzacq, Xavier
Tjian, Robert
Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences
title Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences
title_full Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences
title_fullStr Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences
title_short Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences
title_sort evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31594803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.331520.119
work_keys_str_mv AT mcswiggendavidt evaluatingphaseseparationinlivecellsdiagnosiscaveatsandfunctionalconsequences
AT mirmustafa evaluatingphaseseparationinlivecellsdiagnosiscaveatsandfunctionalconsequences
AT darzacqxavier evaluatingphaseseparationinlivecellsdiagnosiscaveatsandfunctionalconsequences
AT tjianrobert evaluatingphaseseparationinlivecellsdiagnosiscaveatsandfunctionalconsequences