Cargando…

Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis revised: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of results

BACKGROUND: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been adopted as the treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis due to a shorter hospital length of stay and no increased morbidity when compared to delayed cholecystectomy. However, randomised studies and meta-analysis report a wide array of timing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borzellino, Giuseppe, Khuri, Safi, Pisano, Michele, Mansour, Subhi, Allievi, Niccolò, Ansaloni, Luca, Kluger, Yoram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0285-7
_version_ 1783484670451646464
author Borzellino, Giuseppe
Khuri, Safi
Pisano, Michele
Mansour, Subhi
Allievi, Niccolò
Ansaloni, Luca
Kluger, Yoram
author_facet Borzellino, Giuseppe
Khuri, Safi
Pisano, Michele
Mansour, Subhi
Allievi, Niccolò
Ansaloni, Luca
Kluger, Yoram
author_sort Borzellino, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been adopted as the treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis due to a shorter hospital length of stay and no increased morbidity when compared to delayed cholecystectomy. However, randomised studies and meta-analysis report a wide array of timings of early cholecystectomy, most of them set at 72 h following admission. Setting early cholecystectomy at 72 h or even later may influence analysis due to a shift towards a more balanced comparison. At this time, the rate of resolving acute cholecystitis and the rate of ongoing acute process because of failed conservative treatment could be not so different when compared to those operated with a delayed timing of 6–12 weeks. As a result, randomised comparison with such timing for early cholecystectomy and meta-analysis including such studies may have missed a possible advantage of an early cholecystectomy performed within 24 h of the admission, when conservative treatment failure has less potential effects on morbidity. This review will explore pooled data focused on randomised studies with a set timing of early cholecystectomy as a maximum of 24 h following admission, with the aim of verifying the hypothesis that cholecystectomy within 24 h may report a lower post-operative complication rate compared to a delayed intervention. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature will identify randomised clinical studies that compared early and delayed cholecystectomy. Pooled data from studies that settled the early intervention within 24 h from admission will be explored and compared in a sub-group analysis with pooled data of studies that settled early intervention as more than 24 h. DISCUSSION: This paper will not provide evidence strong enough to change the clinical practice, but in case the hypothesis is verified, it will invite to re-consider the timing of early cholecystectomy and might promote future clinical research focusing on an accurate definition of timing for early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6942279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69422792020-01-07 Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis revised: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of results Borzellino, Giuseppe Khuri, Safi Pisano, Michele Mansour, Subhi Allievi, Niccolò Ansaloni, Luca Kluger, Yoram World J Emerg Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been adopted as the treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis due to a shorter hospital length of stay and no increased morbidity when compared to delayed cholecystectomy. However, randomised studies and meta-analysis report a wide array of timings of early cholecystectomy, most of them set at 72 h following admission. Setting early cholecystectomy at 72 h or even later may influence analysis due to a shift towards a more balanced comparison. At this time, the rate of resolving acute cholecystitis and the rate of ongoing acute process because of failed conservative treatment could be not so different when compared to those operated with a delayed timing of 6–12 weeks. As a result, randomised comparison with such timing for early cholecystectomy and meta-analysis including such studies may have missed a possible advantage of an early cholecystectomy performed within 24 h of the admission, when conservative treatment failure has less potential effects on morbidity. This review will explore pooled data focused on randomised studies with a set timing of early cholecystectomy as a maximum of 24 h following admission, with the aim of verifying the hypothesis that cholecystectomy within 24 h may report a lower post-operative complication rate compared to a delayed intervention. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature will identify randomised clinical studies that compared early and delayed cholecystectomy. Pooled data from studies that settled the early intervention within 24 h from admission will be explored and compared in a sub-group analysis with pooled data of studies that settled early intervention as more than 24 h. DISCUSSION: This paper will not provide evidence strong enough to change the clinical practice, but in case the hypothesis is verified, it will invite to re-consider the timing of early cholecystectomy and might promote future clinical research focusing on an accurate definition of timing for early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. BioMed Central 2020-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6942279/ /pubmed/31911813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0285-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Borzellino, Giuseppe
Khuri, Safi
Pisano, Michele
Mansour, Subhi
Allievi, Niccolò
Ansaloni, Luca
Kluger, Yoram
Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis revised: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of results
title Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis revised: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of results
title_full Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis revised: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of results
title_fullStr Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis revised: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of results
title_full_unstemmed Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis revised: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of results
title_short Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis revised: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of results
title_sort timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis revised: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of results
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0285-7
work_keys_str_mv AT borzellinogiuseppe timingofearlylaparoscopiccholecystectomyforacutecalculouscholecystitisrevisedprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresults
AT khurisafi timingofearlylaparoscopiccholecystectomyforacutecalculouscholecystitisrevisedprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresults
AT pisanomichele timingofearlylaparoscopiccholecystectomyforacutecalculouscholecystitisrevisedprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresults
AT mansoursubhi timingofearlylaparoscopiccholecystectomyforacutecalculouscholecystitisrevisedprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresults
AT allieviniccolo timingofearlylaparoscopiccholecystectomyforacutecalculouscholecystitisrevisedprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresults
AT ansaloniluca timingofearlylaparoscopiccholecystectomyforacutecalculouscholecystitisrevisedprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresults
AT klugeryoram timingofearlylaparoscopiccholecystectomyforacutecalculouscholecystitisrevisedprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresults