Cargando…

Increasing the public health voice in global decision-making on nutrition labelling

To respond to the global noncommunicable disease (NCD) crisis, the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), a multilateral United Nations body responsible for work on food standards, is developing global guidance for front of pack (FoP) nutrition labelling. Guidance from Codex regarding FoP nutrition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thow, Anne Marie, Jones, Alexandra, Huckel Schneider, Carmen, Labonté, Ronald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31900178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0533-3
_version_ 1783484677395316736
author Thow, Anne Marie
Jones, Alexandra
Huckel Schneider, Carmen
Labonté, Ronald
author_facet Thow, Anne Marie
Jones, Alexandra
Huckel Schneider, Carmen
Labonté, Ronald
author_sort Thow, Anne Marie
collection PubMed
description To respond to the global noncommunicable disease (NCD) crisis, the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), a multilateral United Nations body responsible for work on food standards, is developing global guidance for front of pack (FoP) nutrition labelling. Guidance from Codex regarding FoP nutrition labelling at the global level will almost certainly influence national policy making. This shift in Codex’s activities towards standards to address NCDs presents new risks for achievement of public health goals, as a result of the high level of industry involvement in this forum; there is a potential commercial conflict of interest held by manufacturers of products whose consumption could be discouraged by such guidance. In this Commentary, we examine the implications of Codex processes for developing robust global guidance on FoP nutrition labelling and identify opportunities to increase consideration of public health objectives. To date, there has been significantly higher representation of food industry compared to public health actors in Codex discussions on FoP nutrition labelling. Without a strong public health voice in Codex, the industry voice could dominate discussions on FoP nutrition labelling, such that subsequent global guidance prioritises future trade and profits over potential risks to public health. There is currently a critical window of opportunity for public health interests to be prioritised in this multisectoral international forum. The key public health priority for global guidance on FoP nutrition labelling is to ensure protection of policy space for national governments to implement strong and effective regulation, and allow scope for innovation. Public health actors can engage directly with Codex processes, at both the national and global level, and also need to raise awareness among domestic policy makers – including with Ministries of Agriculture and Industry, which often represent countries at Codex – regarding the importance and effectiveness of FoP labelling in NCD prevention. Increased engagement with Codex processes represents a tangible new opportunity to strengthen global governance for public health, and move towards improved coherence between trade policy and health protection goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6942308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69423082020-01-07 Increasing the public health voice in global decision-making on nutrition labelling Thow, Anne Marie Jones, Alexandra Huckel Schneider, Carmen Labonté, Ronald Global Health Commentary To respond to the global noncommunicable disease (NCD) crisis, the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), a multilateral United Nations body responsible for work on food standards, is developing global guidance for front of pack (FoP) nutrition labelling. Guidance from Codex regarding FoP nutrition labelling at the global level will almost certainly influence national policy making. This shift in Codex’s activities towards standards to address NCDs presents new risks for achievement of public health goals, as a result of the high level of industry involvement in this forum; there is a potential commercial conflict of interest held by manufacturers of products whose consumption could be discouraged by such guidance. In this Commentary, we examine the implications of Codex processes for developing robust global guidance on FoP nutrition labelling and identify opportunities to increase consideration of public health objectives. To date, there has been significantly higher representation of food industry compared to public health actors in Codex discussions on FoP nutrition labelling. Without a strong public health voice in Codex, the industry voice could dominate discussions on FoP nutrition labelling, such that subsequent global guidance prioritises future trade and profits over potential risks to public health. There is currently a critical window of opportunity for public health interests to be prioritised in this multisectoral international forum. The key public health priority for global guidance on FoP nutrition labelling is to ensure protection of policy space for national governments to implement strong and effective regulation, and allow scope for innovation. Public health actors can engage directly with Codex processes, at both the national and global level, and also need to raise awareness among domestic policy makers – including with Ministries of Agriculture and Industry, which often represent countries at Codex – regarding the importance and effectiveness of FoP labelling in NCD prevention. Increased engagement with Codex processes represents a tangible new opportunity to strengthen global governance for public health, and move towards improved coherence between trade policy and health protection goals. BioMed Central 2020-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6942308/ /pubmed/31900178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0533-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Thow, Anne Marie
Jones, Alexandra
Huckel Schneider, Carmen
Labonté, Ronald
Increasing the public health voice in global decision-making on nutrition labelling
title Increasing the public health voice in global decision-making on nutrition labelling
title_full Increasing the public health voice in global decision-making on nutrition labelling
title_fullStr Increasing the public health voice in global decision-making on nutrition labelling
title_full_unstemmed Increasing the public health voice in global decision-making on nutrition labelling
title_short Increasing the public health voice in global decision-making on nutrition labelling
title_sort increasing the public health voice in global decision-making on nutrition labelling
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31900178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0533-3
work_keys_str_mv AT thowannemarie increasingthepublichealthvoiceinglobaldecisionmakingonnutritionlabelling
AT jonesalexandra increasingthepublichealthvoiceinglobaldecisionmakingonnutritionlabelling
AT huckelschneidercarmen increasingthepublichealthvoiceinglobaldecisionmakingonnutritionlabelling
AT labonteronald increasingthepublichealthvoiceinglobaldecisionmakingonnutritionlabelling