Cargando…

Criterion validity for step counting in four consumer-grade physical activity monitors among older adults with and without rollators

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the measurement properties of consumer-grade physical activity monitors (PAMs) in older adults. Therefore, we investigated the criterion validity of consumer-grade PAMs in older adults and whether the measurement properties differed between older adults with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsen, Rasmus Tolstrup, Korfitsen, Christoffer Brun, Juhl, Carsten Bogh, Andersen, Henning Boje, Langberg, Henning, Christensen, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11556-019-0235-0
_version_ 1783484678584401920
author Larsen, Rasmus Tolstrup
Korfitsen, Christoffer Brun
Juhl, Carsten Bogh
Andersen, Henning Boje
Langberg, Henning
Christensen, Jan
author_facet Larsen, Rasmus Tolstrup
Korfitsen, Christoffer Brun
Juhl, Carsten Bogh
Andersen, Henning Boje
Langberg, Henning
Christensen, Jan
author_sort Larsen, Rasmus Tolstrup
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the measurement properties of consumer-grade physical activity monitors (PAMs) in older adults. Therefore, we investigated the criterion validity of consumer-grade PAMs in older adults and whether the measurement properties differed between older adults with and without rollators and whether worn on the hip or at the wrist. METHODS: Consumer-grade PAMs were eligible for inclusion in this study if they: 1) could be fastened at the hip as well as on the wrist, 2) were simple in function and design and thus easy to use for participants with minimal technical skills, 3) included step-counting as outcome measure and 4) were powered by a button cell battery. Participants performed self-paced walking for six minutes while two physiotherapists counted their steps with a click-counter. The average of the two counts was used as criterion. The participants wore 16 monitors, four located bilaterally on both hips and wrists. Our prior expectation was that all monitors would have at least moderate criterion validity for all participants, good criterion validity for participants walking without a rollator and poor criterion validity for participants walking with a rollator. RESULTS: Four physical activity monitors were included in this study; Misfit Shine, Nokia GO, Jawbone UP Move and Garmin Vivofit 3. A total of 103 older adults participated. Nokia GO was excluded from this study due to technical issues. Therefore, we present results on the frequency of data loss, ICC (1, 2) and percentage measurement error for Misfit Shine, Garmin Vivofit 3 and Jawbone UP Move located on four different positions. CONCLUSIONS: The hip-worn PAMs did not differ significantly in terms of measurement error or criterion validity. Wrist-worn monitors cannot adequately measure number of steps in a population of older adults using rollators. The hip-worn PAMs were superior to wrist-worn PAMs among older adults with and without rollators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6942313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69423132020-01-07 Criterion validity for step counting in four consumer-grade physical activity monitors among older adults with and without rollators Larsen, Rasmus Tolstrup Korfitsen, Christoffer Brun Juhl, Carsten Bogh Andersen, Henning Boje Langberg, Henning Christensen, Jan Eur Rev Aging Phys Act Research Article BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the measurement properties of consumer-grade physical activity monitors (PAMs) in older adults. Therefore, we investigated the criterion validity of consumer-grade PAMs in older adults and whether the measurement properties differed between older adults with and without rollators and whether worn on the hip or at the wrist. METHODS: Consumer-grade PAMs were eligible for inclusion in this study if they: 1) could be fastened at the hip as well as on the wrist, 2) were simple in function and design and thus easy to use for participants with minimal technical skills, 3) included step-counting as outcome measure and 4) were powered by a button cell battery. Participants performed self-paced walking for six minutes while two physiotherapists counted their steps with a click-counter. The average of the two counts was used as criterion. The participants wore 16 monitors, four located bilaterally on both hips and wrists. Our prior expectation was that all monitors would have at least moderate criterion validity for all participants, good criterion validity for participants walking without a rollator and poor criterion validity for participants walking with a rollator. RESULTS: Four physical activity monitors were included in this study; Misfit Shine, Nokia GO, Jawbone UP Move and Garmin Vivofit 3. A total of 103 older adults participated. Nokia GO was excluded from this study due to technical issues. Therefore, we present results on the frequency of data loss, ICC (1, 2) and percentage measurement error for Misfit Shine, Garmin Vivofit 3 and Jawbone UP Move located on four different positions. CONCLUSIONS: The hip-worn PAMs did not differ significantly in terms of measurement error or criterion validity. Wrist-worn monitors cannot adequately measure number of steps in a population of older adults using rollators. The hip-worn PAMs were superior to wrist-worn PAMs among older adults with and without rollators. BioMed Central 2020-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6942313/ /pubmed/31911823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11556-019-0235-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Larsen, Rasmus Tolstrup
Korfitsen, Christoffer Brun
Juhl, Carsten Bogh
Andersen, Henning Boje
Langberg, Henning
Christensen, Jan
Criterion validity for step counting in four consumer-grade physical activity monitors among older adults with and without rollators
title Criterion validity for step counting in four consumer-grade physical activity monitors among older adults with and without rollators
title_full Criterion validity for step counting in four consumer-grade physical activity monitors among older adults with and without rollators
title_fullStr Criterion validity for step counting in four consumer-grade physical activity monitors among older adults with and without rollators
title_full_unstemmed Criterion validity for step counting in four consumer-grade physical activity monitors among older adults with and without rollators
title_short Criterion validity for step counting in four consumer-grade physical activity monitors among older adults with and without rollators
title_sort criterion validity for step counting in four consumer-grade physical activity monitors among older adults with and without rollators
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11556-019-0235-0
work_keys_str_mv AT larsenrasmustolstrup criterionvalidityforstepcountinginfourconsumergradephysicalactivitymonitorsamongolderadultswithandwithoutrollators
AT korfitsenchristofferbrun criterionvalidityforstepcountinginfourconsumergradephysicalactivitymonitorsamongolderadultswithandwithoutrollators
AT juhlcarstenbogh criterionvalidityforstepcountinginfourconsumergradephysicalactivitymonitorsamongolderadultswithandwithoutrollators
AT andersenhenningboje criterionvalidityforstepcountinginfourconsumergradephysicalactivitymonitorsamongolderadultswithandwithoutrollators
AT langberghenning criterionvalidityforstepcountinginfourconsumergradephysicalactivitymonitorsamongolderadultswithandwithoutrollators
AT christensenjan criterionvalidityforstepcountinginfourconsumergradephysicalactivitymonitorsamongolderadultswithandwithoutrollators