Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis

This systematic review aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI for detecting cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Pubmed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched systematically. A diagnostic study was included if it performed MRI (index test) and postnatal examination (refer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Hoek-Snieders, Hanneke E. M., van den Heuvel, Antonius J. M. L., van Os-Medendorp, Harmieke, Kamalski, Digna M. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31797081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03500-x
_version_ 1783484734794366976
author van der Hoek-Snieders, Hanneke E. M.
van den Heuvel, Antonius J. M. L.
van Os-Medendorp, Harmieke
Kamalski, Digna M. A.
author_facet van der Hoek-Snieders, Hanneke E. M.
van den Heuvel, Antonius J. M. L.
van Os-Medendorp, Harmieke
Kamalski, Digna M. A.
author_sort van der Hoek-Snieders, Hanneke E. M.
collection PubMed
description This systematic review aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI for detecting cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Pubmed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched systematically. A diagnostic study was included if it performed MRI (index test) and postnatal examination (reference test) in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model, calculating the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. The search resulted in eight studies (334 fetuses) to be included: four prospective and four retrospective studies. The applicability concern was low. There was, however, a risk of selection and information bias. All studies showed that MRI well predicted the chance of cleft palate. The sensitivity results were homogeneous, but heterogeneity was assumed regarding the specificity estimate (Cochrane’s Q test: p = 0.00). The pooled sensitivity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.93–0.99); the pooled specificity was 0.94 (0.89–0.97). The area under the curve was 0.98 (95% CI 0.98–0.99). Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that MRI has an excellent sensitivity and good to excellent specificity for diagnosing cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Future research should assess applicability for clinical care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00431-019-03500-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6942582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69425822020-01-16 Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis van der Hoek-Snieders, Hanneke E. M. van den Heuvel, Antonius J. M. L. van Os-Medendorp, Harmieke Kamalski, Digna M. A. Eur J Pediatr Review This systematic review aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI for detecting cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Pubmed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched systematically. A diagnostic study was included if it performed MRI (index test) and postnatal examination (reference test) in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model, calculating the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. The search resulted in eight studies (334 fetuses) to be included: four prospective and four retrospective studies. The applicability concern was low. There was, however, a risk of selection and information bias. All studies showed that MRI well predicted the chance of cleft palate. The sensitivity results were homogeneous, but heterogeneity was assumed regarding the specificity estimate (Cochrane’s Q test: p = 0.00). The pooled sensitivity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.93–0.99); the pooled specificity was 0.94 (0.89–0.97). The area under the curve was 0.98 (95% CI 0.98–0.99). Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that MRI has an excellent sensitivity and good to excellent specificity for diagnosing cleft palate in fetuses at risk for orofacial clefts. Future research should assess applicability for clinical care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00431-019-03500-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6942582/ /pubmed/31797081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03500-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
van der Hoek-Snieders, Hanneke E. M.
van den Heuvel, Antonius J. M. L.
van Os-Medendorp, Harmieke
Kamalski, Digna M. A.
Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of fetal mri to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31797081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03500-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderhoeksniedershannekeem diagnosticaccuracyoffetalmritodetectcleftpalateametaanalysis
AT vandenheuvelantoniusjml diagnosticaccuracyoffetalmritodetectcleftpalateametaanalysis
AT vanosmedendorpharmieke diagnosticaccuracyoffetalmritodetectcleftpalateametaanalysis
AT kamalskidignama diagnosticaccuracyoffetalmritodetectcleftpalateametaanalysis