Cargando…

The Relationship between Military Combat and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death among military veterans with several reports suggesting a link between combat and related traumatic injury (TI) to an increased CVD risk. The aim of this paper is to conduct a widespread systematic review and meta-an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boos, Christopher J., De Villiers, Norman, Dyball, Daniel, McConnell, Alison, Bennett, Alexander N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9849465
_version_ 1783484775312392192
author Boos, Christopher J.
De Villiers, Norman
Dyball, Daniel
McConnell, Alison
Bennett, Alexander N.
author_facet Boos, Christopher J.
De Villiers, Norman
Dyball, Daniel
McConnell, Alison
Bennett, Alexander N.
author_sort Boos, Christopher J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death among military veterans with several reports suggesting a link between combat and related traumatic injury (TI) to an increased CVD risk. The aim of this paper is to conduct a widespread systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between military combat ± TI to CVD and its associated risk factors. METHODS: PubMed, EmbaseProQuest, Cinahl databases and Cochrane Reviews were examined for all published observational studies (any language) reporting on CVD risk and outcomes, following military combat exposure ± TI versus a comparative nonexposed control population. Two investigators independently extracted data. Data quality was rated and rated using the 20-item AXIS Critical Appraisal Tool. The risk of bias (ROB using the ROBANS 6 item tool) and strength of evidence (SOE) were also critically appraised. RESULTS: From 4499 citations, 26 studies (14 cross sectional and 12 cohort; 78–100% male) met the inclusion criteria. The follow up period ranged from 1 to 43.6 years with a sample size ranging from 19 to 621901 participants in the combat group. Combat-related TI was associated with a significantly increased risk for CVD (RR 1.80: 95% CI 1.24–2.62; I(2) = 59%, p = 0.002) and coronary heart disease (CHD)-related death (risk ratio 1.57: 95% CI 1.35–1.83; I(2) = 0%, p = 0.77: p < 0.0001), although the SOE was low. Military combat (without TI) was linked to a marginal, yet significantly lower pooled risk (low SOE) of cardiovascular death in the active combat versus control population (RR 0.90: CI 0.83–0.98; I(2) = 47%, p = 0.02). There was insufficient evidence linking combat ± TI to any other cardiovascular outcomes or risk factors. CONCLUSION: There is low SOE to support a link between combat-related TI and both cardiovascular and CHD-related mortality. There is insufficient evidence to support a positive association between military combat ± any other adverse cardiovascular outcomes or risk factors. Data from well conducted prospective cohort studies following combat are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6942813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69428132020-01-13 The Relationship between Military Combat and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Boos, Christopher J. De Villiers, Norman Dyball, Daniel McConnell, Alison Bennett, Alexander N. Int J Vasc Med Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death among military veterans with several reports suggesting a link between combat and related traumatic injury (TI) to an increased CVD risk. The aim of this paper is to conduct a widespread systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between military combat ± TI to CVD and its associated risk factors. METHODS: PubMed, EmbaseProQuest, Cinahl databases and Cochrane Reviews were examined for all published observational studies (any language) reporting on CVD risk and outcomes, following military combat exposure ± TI versus a comparative nonexposed control population. Two investigators independently extracted data. Data quality was rated and rated using the 20-item AXIS Critical Appraisal Tool. The risk of bias (ROB using the ROBANS 6 item tool) and strength of evidence (SOE) were also critically appraised. RESULTS: From 4499 citations, 26 studies (14 cross sectional and 12 cohort; 78–100% male) met the inclusion criteria. The follow up period ranged from 1 to 43.6 years with a sample size ranging from 19 to 621901 participants in the combat group. Combat-related TI was associated with a significantly increased risk for CVD (RR 1.80: 95% CI 1.24–2.62; I(2) = 59%, p = 0.002) and coronary heart disease (CHD)-related death (risk ratio 1.57: 95% CI 1.35–1.83; I(2) = 0%, p = 0.77: p < 0.0001), although the SOE was low. Military combat (without TI) was linked to a marginal, yet significantly lower pooled risk (low SOE) of cardiovascular death in the active combat versus control population (RR 0.90: CI 0.83–0.98; I(2) = 47%, p = 0.02). There was insufficient evidence linking combat ± TI to any other cardiovascular outcomes or risk factors. CONCLUSION: There is low SOE to support a link between combat-related TI and both cardiovascular and CHD-related mortality. There is insufficient evidence to support a positive association between military combat ± any other adverse cardiovascular outcomes or risk factors. Data from well conducted prospective cohort studies following combat are needed. Hindawi 2019-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6942813/ /pubmed/31934451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9849465 Text en Copyright © 2019 Christopher J. Boos et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Boos, Christopher J.
De Villiers, Norman
Dyball, Daniel
McConnell, Alison
Bennett, Alexander N.
The Relationship between Military Combat and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Relationship between Military Combat and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Relationship between Military Combat and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Relationship between Military Combat and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Military Combat and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Relationship between Military Combat and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort relationship between military combat and cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9849465
work_keys_str_mv AT booschristopherj therelationshipbetweenmilitarycombatandcardiovascularriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT devilliersnorman therelationshipbetweenmilitarycombatandcardiovascularriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dyballdaniel therelationshipbetweenmilitarycombatandcardiovascularriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcconnellalison therelationshipbetweenmilitarycombatandcardiovascularriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bennettalexandern therelationshipbetweenmilitarycombatandcardiovascularriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT booschristopherj relationshipbetweenmilitarycombatandcardiovascularriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT devilliersnorman relationshipbetweenmilitarycombatandcardiovascularriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dyballdaniel relationshipbetweenmilitarycombatandcardiovascularriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcconnellalison relationshipbetweenmilitarycombatandcardiovascularriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bennettalexandern relationshipbetweenmilitarycombatandcardiovascularriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis