Cargando…
Relapse recovery: The forgotten variable in multiple sclerosis clinical trials
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether basing the decision to initiate immediate vs delayed disease-modifying therapy (DMT) on extent of recovery after initial relapse affects long-term disability accumulation in a multiple sclerosis (MS) evidence-based setting. METHODS: We analyzed the double-blind, place...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6943367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31848231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000653 |
_version_ | 1783484871835910144 |
---|---|
author | Kantarci, Orhun H. Zeydan, Burcu Atkinson, Elizabeth J. Conway, Brittani L. Castrillo-Viguera, Carmen Rodriguez, Moses |
author_facet | Kantarci, Orhun H. Zeydan, Burcu Atkinson, Elizabeth J. Conway, Brittani L. Castrillo-Viguera, Carmen Rodriguez, Moses |
author_sort | Kantarci, Orhun H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine whether basing the decision to initiate immediate vs delayed disease-modifying therapy (DMT) on extent of recovery after initial relapse affects long-term disability accumulation in a multiple sclerosis (MS) evidence-based setting. METHODS: We analyzed the double-blind, placebo-controlled interferon beta-1a 30 mc once a week in clinically isolated syndrome and 10-year-follow-up extension trial. Good recovery after presenting relapse was defined as (1) full early recovery within 28 days of symptom onset (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score of 0 at enrollment maintained ≥6 months) and (2) delayed good recovery (EDSS score > 0 at enrollment and improvement from peak deficit to 6th-month or 1-year visit ≥ median). Time from recovery assignment to future disability (EDSS score ≥ 2.5 or ≥4.0) was studied on a relapse-recovery-stratified age axis and immediate vs 3-year delayed treatment initiation with Kaplan-Meier statistics and hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five/328 patients had good recovery (94 immediate and 81 delayed treatment); 153 did not have good recovery (77 immediate and 76 delayed treatment). HRs for EDSS score ≥2.5 outcome were: delayed treatment without good recovery as reference (HR = 1.0), delayed treatment with good recovery (HR(6th-month): 0.67, p = 0.207; HR(1st-year): 0.40, p = 0.027), immediate treatment without good recovery (HR(6th-month): 0.56, p = 0.061; HR(1st-year): 0.40, p = 0.011), and immediate treatment with good recovery (HR(6th-month): 0.43, p = 0.014; HR(1st-year): 0.48, p = 0.034). Placebo patients were switched to long-term treatment after 3 years, and insufficient EDSS score ≥4.0 outcome events were available to study. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MS presenting without good recovery after the initial relapse, immediate DMT initiation favorably influences the likelihood of more ambulatory-benign disease akin to patients with good recovery after the initial relapse. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with MS without good recovery after the initial relapse, immediate DMT initiation increases the likelihood of a benign disease course. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6943367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69433672020-02-10 Relapse recovery: The forgotten variable in multiple sclerosis clinical trials Kantarci, Orhun H. Zeydan, Burcu Atkinson, Elizabeth J. Conway, Brittani L. Castrillo-Viguera, Carmen Rodriguez, Moses Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether basing the decision to initiate immediate vs delayed disease-modifying therapy (DMT) on extent of recovery after initial relapse affects long-term disability accumulation in a multiple sclerosis (MS) evidence-based setting. METHODS: We analyzed the double-blind, placebo-controlled interferon beta-1a 30 mc once a week in clinically isolated syndrome and 10-year-follow-up extension trial. Good recovery after presenting relapse was defined as (1) full early recovery within 28 days of symptom onset (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score of 0 at enrollment maintained ≥6 months) and (2) delayed good recovery (EDSS score > 0 at enrollment and improvement from peak deficit to 6th-month or 1-year visit ≥ median). Time from recovery assignment to future disability (EDSS score ≥ 2.5 or ≥4.0) was studied on a relapse-recovery-stratified age axis and immediate vs 3-year delayed treatment initiation with Kaplan-Meier statistics and hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five/328 patients had good recovery (94 immediate and 81 delayed treatment); 153 did not have good recovery (77 immediate and 76 delayed treatment). HRs for EDSS score ≥2.5 outcome were: delayed treatment without good recovery as reference (HR = 1.0), delayed treatment with good recovery (HR(6th-month): 0.67, p = 0.207; HR(1st-year): 0.40, p = 0.027), immediate treatment without good recovery (HR(6th-month): 0.56, p = 0.061; HR(1st-year): 0.40, p = 0.011), and immediate treatment with good recovery (HR(6th-month): 0.43, p = 0.014; HR(1st-year): 0.48, p = 0.034). Placebo patients were switched to long-term treatment after 3 years, and insufficient EDSS score ≥4.0 outcome events were available to study. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MS presenting without good recovery after the initial relapse, immediate DMT initiation favorably influences the likelihood of more ambulatory-benign disease akin to patients with good recovery after the initial relapse. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with MS without good recovery after the initial relapse, immediate DMT initiation increases the likelihood of a benign disease course. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6943367/ /pubmed/31848231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000653 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Article Kantarci, Orhun H. Zeydan, Burcu Atkinson, Elizabeth J. Conway, Brittani L. Castrillo-Viguera, Carmen Rodriguez, Moses Relapse recovery: The forgotten variable in multiple sclerosis clinical trials |
title | Relapse recovery: The forgotten variable in multiple sclerosis clinical trials |
title_full | Relapse recovery: The forgotten variable in multiple sclerosis clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Relapse recovery: The forgotten variable in multiple sclerosis clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Relapse recovery: The forgotten variable in multiple sclerosis clinical trials |
title_short | Relapse recovery: The forgotten variable in multiple sclerosis clinical trials |
title_sort | relapse recovery: the forgotten variable in multiple sclerosis clinical trials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6943367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31848231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kantarciorhunh relapserecoverytheforgottenvariableinmultiplesclerosisclinicaltrials AT zeydanburcu relapserecoverytheforgottenvariableinmultiplesclerosisclinicaltrials AT atkinsonelizabethj relapserecoverytheforgottenvariableinmultiplesclerosisclinicaltrials AT conwaybrittanil relapserecoverytheforgottenvariableinmultiplesclerosisclinicaltrials AT castrillovigueracarmen relapserecoverytheforgottenvariableinmultiplesclerosisclinicaltrials AT rodriguezmoses relapserecoverytheforgottenvariableinmultiplesclerosisclinicaltrials |