Cargando…

Anorectal Function After Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis Is Better than Pelvic Pouch in Selected Ulcerative Colitis Patients

BACKGROUND: With a lifelong perspective, 12% of ulcerative colitis patients will need a colectomy. Further reconstruction via ileo-rectal anastomosis or pouch can be affected by patients’ perspective of their quality of life after surgery. AIM: To assess the function and quality of life after restor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdalla, Maie, Norblad, Rickard, Olsson, Malin, Landerholm, Kalle, Andersson, Peter, Söderholm, Johan D., Andersson, Roland, Myrelid, Pär
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6943403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31372911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05757-6
_version_ 1783484873528311808
author Abdalla, Maie
Norblad, Rickard
Olsson, Malin
Landerholm, Kalle
Andersson, Peter
Söderholm, Johan D.
Andersson, Roland
Myrelid, Pär
author_facet Abdalla, Maie
Norblad, Rickard
Olsson, Malin
Landerholm, Kalle
Andersson, Peter
Söderholm, Johan D.
Andersson, Roland
Myrelid, Pär
author_sort Abdalla, Maie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With a lifelong perspective, 12% of ulcerative colitis patients will need a colectomy. Further reconstruction via ileo-rectal anastomosis or pouch can be affected by patients’ perspective of their quality of life after surgery. AIM: To assess the function and quality of life after restorative procedures with either ileo-rectal anastomosis or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in relation to the inflammatory activity on endoscopy and in biopsies. METHOD: A total of 143 UC patients operated with subtotal colectomy and ileo-rectal anastomosis or pouches between 1992 and 2006 at Linköping University Hospital were invited to participate. Those who completed the validated questionnaires (Öresland score, SF-36, Short Health Scale) were offered an endoscopic evaluation including multiple biopsies. Associations between anorectal function and quality of life with type of restorative procedure and severity of endoscopic and histopathologic grading of inflammation were evaluated. RESULTS: Some 77 (53.9%) eligible patients completed questionnaires, of these 68 (88.3%) underwent endoscopic evaluation after a median follow-up of 12.5 (range 3.5–19.4) years after restorative procedure. Patients with ileo-rectal anastomosis reported better overall Öresland score: median = 3 (IQR 2–5) for ileo-rectal anastomosis (n = 38) and 10 (IQR 5–15) for pouch patients (n = 39) (p < 0.001). Anorectal function (Öresland score) and endoscopic findings (Baron-Ginsberg score) were positively correlated in pouch patients (tau: 0.28, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Patients operated with ileo-rectal anastomosis reported better continence compared to pouches. Minor differences were noted regarding the quality of life. Ileo-rectal anastomosis is a valid option for properly selected ulcerative colitis patients if strict postoperative endoscopic surveillance is carried out. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10620-019-05757-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6943403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69434032020-01-21 Anorectal Function After Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis Is Better than Pelvic Pouch in Selected Ulcerative Colitis Patients Abdalla, Maie Norblad, Rickard Olsson, Malin Landerholm, Kalle Andersson, Peter Söderholm, Johan D. Andersson, Roland Myrelid, Pär Dig Dis Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: With a lifelong perspective, 12% of ulcerative colitis patients will need a colectomy. Further reconstruction via ileo-rectal anastomosis or pouch can be affected by patients’ perspective of their quality of life after surgery. AIM: To assess the function and quality of life after restorative procedures with either ileo-rectal anastomosis or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in relation to the inflammatory activity on endoscopy and in biopsies. METHOD: A total of 143 UC patients operated with subtotal colectomy and ileo-rectal anastomosis or pouches between 1992 and 2006 at Linköping University Hospital were invited to participate. Those who completed the validated questionnaires (Öresland score, SF-36, Short Health Scale) were offered an endoscopic evaluation including multiple biopsies. Associations between anorectal function and quality of life with type of restorative procedure and severity of endoscopic and histopathologic grading of inflammation were evaluated. RESULTS: Some 77 (53.9%) eligible patients completed questionnaires, of these 68 (88.3%) underwent endoscopic evaluation after a median follow-up of 12.5 (range 3.5–19.4) years after restorative procedure. Patients with ileo-rectal anastomosis reported better overall Öresland score: median = 3 (IQR 2–5) for ileo-rectal anastomosis (n = 38) and 10 (IQR 5–15) for pouch patients (n = 39) (p < 0.001). Anorectal function (Öresland score) and endoscopic findings (Baron-Ginsberg score) were positively correlated in pouch patients (tau: 0.28, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Patients operated with ileo-rectal anastomosis reported better continence compared to pouches. Minor differences were noted regarding the quality of life. Ileo-rectal anastomosis is a valid option for properly selected ulcerative colitis patients if strict postoperative endoscopic surveillance is carried out. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10620-019-05757-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-08-01 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6943403/ /pubmed/31372911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05757-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abdalla, Maie
Norblad, Rickard
Olsson, Malin
Landerholm, Kalle
Andersson, Peter
Söderholm, Johan D.
Andersson, Roland
Myrelid, Pär
Anorectal Function After Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis Is Better than Pelvic Pouch in Selected Ulcerative Colitis Patients
title Anorectal Function After Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis Is Better than Pelvic Pouch in Selected Ulcerative Colitis Patients
title_full Anorectal Function After Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis Is Better than Pelvic Pouch in Selected Ulcerative Colitis Patients
title_fullStr Anorectal Function After Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis Is Better than Pelvic Pouch in Selected Ulcerative Colitis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Anorectal Function After Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis Is Better than Pelvic Pouch in Selected Ulcerative Colitis Patients
title_short Anorectal Function After Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis Is Better than Pelvic Pouch in Selected Ulcerative Colitis Patients
title_sort anorectal function after ileo-rectal anastomosis is better than pelvic pouch in selected ulcerative colitis patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6943403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31372911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05757-6
work_keys_str_mv AT abdallamaie anorectalfunctionafterileorectalanastomosisisbetterthanpelvicpouchinselectedulcerativecolitispatients
AT norbladrickard anorectalfunctionafterileorectalanastomosisisbetterthanpelvicpouchinselectedulcerativecolitispatients
AT olssonmalin anorectalfunctionafterileorectalanastomosisisbetterthanpelvicpouchinselectedulcerativecolitispatients
AT landerholmkalle anorectalfunctionafterileorectalanastomosisisbetterthanpelvicpouchinselectedulcerativecolitispatients
AT anderssonpeter anorectalfunctionafterileorectalanastomosisisbetterthanpelvicpouchinselectedulcerativecolitispatients
AT soderholmjohand anorectalfunctionafterileorectalanastomosisisbetterthanpelvicpouchinselectedulcerativecolitispatients
AT anderssonroland anorectalfunctionafterileorectalanastomosisisbetterthanpelvicpouchinselectedulcerativecolitispatients
AT myrelidpar anorectalfunctionafterileorectalanastomosisisbetterthanpelvicpouchinselectedulcerativecolitispatients