Cargando…

Endoscopic Variceal Sequential Ligation Does Not Increase Risk of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Cirrhosis Patients

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic variceal sequential ligation (EVSL) is currently endorsed in our hospital, as the preferred endoscopic treatment for prevention of variceal rebleeding and achieving adequate hemostasis. There is currently a lack of consensus surrounding EVSL-induced changes in esophageal motor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tao, Jin, Li, JianZhong, Chen, XiaoLiang, Guo, YunWei, Tian, Hong, Wei, XiuQing, Zheng, FengPing, Wen, ZhuoFu, Wu, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6943406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31332625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05740-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Endoscopic variceal sequential ligation (EVSL) is currently endorsed in our hospital, as the preferred endoscopic treatment for prevention of variceal rebleeding and achieving adequate hemostasis. There is currently a lack of consensus surrounding EVSL-induced changes in esophageal motor function and abnormal reflux. AIMS: To explore alterations in esophageal motor function and risk of abnormal gastroesophageal reflux in liver cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices, after EVSL. METHODS: Twenty-one liver cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices were studied using manometry and 24-h pH monitoring 1 day prior to and 1 month following EVSL. The EVSL consisted of performing esophageal variceal ligation using a multi-band ligator, which was repeated every 4 weeks until the varices were eradicated. RESULTS: The amplitude and duration of peristaltic contraction waves and the percentage of abnormal esophageal contraction waveforms were unaltered in both the proximal (P > 0.05) and the distal (P > 0.05) esophagus after EVSL. However, the lower esophageal sphincter pressure was decreased following EVSL (16.1 ± 7.9 mmHg vs 21.1 ± 6.3 mmHg (P < 0.05)). Various quantitative parameters including percentage of total monitoring time with pH < 4.0, total number of reflux episodes, number of reflux episodes > 5 min, and DeMeester scores were not increased in post-EVSL patients. Abnormal reflux monitored by 24-h pH monitoring occurred in ten (47.6%) pre-EVSL patients and 11 (52.4%) post-EVSL patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although EVSL affects esophageal motility by relatively decreasing LES pressure, it does not induce substantial motor abnormalities nor increase risk of abnormal gastroesophageal reflux disease in cirrhosis patients.