Cargando…
The prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study
BACKGROUND: The median nerve cross-sectional area (MNCSA) is a useful morphological parameter for the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, there have been limited studies investigating the anatomical basis of median nerve flattening. Thus, to evaluate the connection between median ne...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Pain Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6944367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.54 |
_version_ | 1783485025943027712 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Sooho Cho, Hyung Rae Yoo, Jun Sung Kim, Young Uk |
author_facet | Lee, Sooho Cho, Hyung Rae Yoo, Jun Sung Kim, Young Uk |
author_sort | Lee, Sooho |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The median nerve cross-sectional area (MNCSA) is a useful morphological parameter for the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, there have been limited studies investigating the anatomical basis of median nerve flattening. Thus, to evaluate the connection between median nerve flattening and CTS, we carried out a measurement of the median nerve thickness (MNT). METHODS: Both MNCSA and MNT measurement tools were collected from 20 patients with CTS, and from 20 control individuals who underwent carpal tunnel magnetic resonance imaging (CTMRI). We measured the MNCSA and MNT at the level of the hook of hamate on CTMRI. The MNCSA was measured on the transverse angled sections through the whole area. The MNT was measured based on the most compressed MNT. RESULTS: The mean MNCSA was 9.01 ± 1.94 mm(2) in the control group and 6.58 ± 1.75 mm(2) in the CTS group. The mean MNT was 2.18 ± 0.39 mm in the control group and 1.43 ± 0.28 mm in the CTS group. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated that the optimal cut-off value for the MNCSA was 7.72 mm(2), with 75.0% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69–0.95). The best cut off-threshold of the MNT was 1.76 mm, with 85% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87–1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Even though both MNCSA and MNT were significantly associated with CTS, MNT was identified as a more suitable measurement parameter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6944367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Korean Pain Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69443672020-01-09 The prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study Lee, Sooho Cho, Hyung Rae Yoo, Jun Sung Kim, Young Uk Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: The median nerve cross-sectional area (MNCSA) is a useful morphological parameter for the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, there have been limited studies investigating the anatomical basis of median nerve flattening. Thus, to evaluate the connection between median nerve flattening and CTS, we carried out a measurement of the median nerve thickness (MNT). METHODS: Both MNCSA and MNT measurement tools were collected from 20 patients with CTS, and from 20 control individuals who underwent carpal tunnel magnetic resonance imaging (CTMRI). We measured the MNCSA and MNT at the level of the hook of hamate on CTMRI. The MNCSA was measured on the transverse angled sections through the whole area. The MNT was measured based on the most compressed MNT. RESULTS: The mean MNCSA was 9.01 ± 1.94 mm(2) in the control group and 6.58 ± 1.75 mm(2) in the CTS group. The mean MNT was 2.18 ± 0.39 mm in the control group and 1.43 ± 0.28 mm in the CTS group. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated that the optimal cut-off value for the MNCSA was 7.72 mm(2), with 75.0% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69–0.95). The best cut off-threshold of the MNT was 1.76 mm, with 85% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87–1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Even though both MNCSA and MNT were significantly associated with CTS, MNT was identified as a more suitable measurement parameter. The Korean Pain Society 2020-01 2020-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6944367/ /pubmed/31888318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.54 Text en © The Korean Pain Society, 2020 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Sooho Cho, Hyung Rae Yoo, Jun Sung Kim, Young Uk The prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study |
title | The prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study |
title_full | The prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | The prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study |
title_short | The prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study |
title_sort | prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6944367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.54 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesooho theprognosticvalueofmediannervethicknessindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeusingmagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudy AT chohyungrae theprognosticvalueofmediannervethicknessindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeusingmagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudy AT yoojunsung theprognosticvalueofmediannervethicknessindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeusingmagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudy AT kimyounguk theprognosticvalueofmediannervethicknessindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeusingmagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudy AT leesooho prognosticvalueofmediannervethicknessindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeusingmagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudy AT chohyungrae prognosticvalueofmediannervethicknessindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeusingmagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudy AT yoojunsung prognosticvalueofmediannervethicknessindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeusingmagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudy AT kimyounguk prognosticvalueofmediannervethicknessindiagnosingcarpaltunnelsyndromeusingmagneticresonanceimagingapilotstudy |