Cargando…

Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel(®)) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain

BACKGROUND: Low back pain secondary to discopathy is a common pain disorder. Multiple minimally invasive therapeutic modalities have been proposed; however, to date no study has compared percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) with intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel(...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashemi, Masoud, Dadkhah, Payman, Taheri, Mehrdad, Katibeh, Pegah, Asadi, Saman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pain Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6944373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888320
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.66
_version_ 1783485027363848192
author Hashemi, Masoud
Dadkhah, Payman
Taheri, Mehrdad
Katibeh, Pegah
Asadi, Saman
author_facet Hashemi, Masoud
Dadkhah, Payman
Taheri, Mehrdad
Katibeh, Pegah
Asadi, Saman
author_sort Hashemi, Masoud
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low back pain secondary to discopathy is a common pain disorder. Multiple minimally invasive therapeutic modalities have been proposed; however, to date no study has compared percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) with intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel(®)). We are introducing the first study on patient-reported outcomes of DiscoGel(®) vs. PLDD for radiculopathy. METHODS: Seventy-two patients were randomly selected from either a previous strategy of PLDD or DiscoGel(®), which had been performed in our center during 2016–2017. Participants were asked about their numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and progression to secondary treatment. RESULTS: The mean NRS scores in the total cohort before intervention was 8.0, and was reduced to 4.3 in the DiscoGel(®) group and 4.2 in the PLDD group after 12 months, which was statistically significant. The mean ODI score before intervention was 81.25% which was reduced to 41.14% in the DiscoGel(®) group and 52.86% in the PLDD group after 12 months, which was statistically significant. Between-group comparison of NRS scores after two follow-ups were not statistically different (P = 0.62) but the ODI score in DiscoGel(®) was statistically lower (P = 0.001). Six cases (16.67%) from each group reported undergoing surgery after the follow-up period which was not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques were equivalent in pain reduction but DiscoGel(®) had a greater effect on decreasing disability after 12 months, although the rate of progression to secondary treatments and/or surgery was almost equal in the two groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6944373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Pain Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69443732020-01-09 Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel(®)) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain Hashemi, Masoud Dadkhah, Payman Taheri, Mehrdad Katibeh, Pegah Asadi, Saman Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: Low back pain secondary to discopathy is a common pain disorder. Multiple minimally invasive therapeutic modalities have been proposed; however, to date no study has compared percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) with intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel(®)). We are introducing the first study on patient-reported outcomes of DiscoGel(®) vs. PLDD for radiculopathy. METHODS: Seventy-two patients were randomly selected from either a previous strategy of PLDD or DiscoGel(®), which had been performed in our center during 2016–2017. Participants were asked about their numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and progression to secondary treatment. RESULTS: The mean NRS scores in the total cohort before intervention was 8.0, and was reduced to 4.3 in the DiscoGel(®) group and 4.2 in the PLDD group after 12 months, which was statistically significant. The mean ODI score before intervention was 81.25% which was reduced to 41.14% in the DiscoGel(®) group and 52.86% in the PLDD group after 12 months, which was statistically significant. Between-group comparison of NRS scores after two follow-ups were not statistically different (P = 0.62) but the ODI score in DiscoGel(®) was statistically lower (P = 0.001). Six cases (16.67%) from each group reported undergoing surgery after the follow-up period which was not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques were equivalent in pain reduction but DiscoGel(®) had a greater effect on decreasing disability after 12 months, although the rate of progression to secondary treatments and/or surgery was almost equal in the two groups. The Korean Pain Society 2020-01 2020-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6944373/ /pubmed/31888320 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.66 Text en © The Korean Pain Society, 2020 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hashemi, Masoud
Dadkhah, Payman
Taheri, Mehrdad
Katibeh, Pegah
Asadi, Saman
Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel(®)) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain
title Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel(®)) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain
title_full Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel(®)) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain
title_fullStr Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel(®)) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel(®)) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain
title_short Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel(®)) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain
title_sort effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (discogel(®)) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6944373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888320
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.66
work_keys_str_mv AT hashemimasoud effectivenessofintradiscalinjectionofradiopaquegelifiedethanoldiscogelversuspercutaneouslaserdiscdecompressioninpatientswithchronicradicularlowbackpain
AT dadkhahpayman effectivenessofintradiscalinjectionofradiopaquegelifiedethanoldiscogelversuspercutaneouslaserdiscdecompressioninpatientswithchronicradicularlowbackpain
AT taherimehrdad effectivenessofintradiscalinjectionofradiopaquegelifiedethanoldiscogelversuspercutaneouslaserdiscdecompressioninpatientswithchronicradicularlowbackpain
AT katibehpegah effectivenessofintradiscalinjectionofradiopaquegelifiedethanoldiscogelversuspercutaneouslaserdiscdecompressioninpatientswithchronicradicularlowbackpain
AT asadisaman effectivenessofintradiscalinjectionofradiopaquegelifiedethanoldiscogelversuspercutaneouslaserdiscdecompressioninpatientswithchronicradicularlowbackpain