Cargando…
Evoked Frontal and Parietal Field Potential Signatures of Target Detection and Response Inhibition in Rats Performing an Equiprobable Auditory Go/No-Go Task
To characterize the rat as a potential model of frontal-parietal auditory processing during sustained attention, target detection, and response inhibition, we recorded field potentials (FPs) at multiple sites in medial-dorsal frontal and posterior parietal cortex simultaneously while rats performed...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6944478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31767572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0055-19.2019 |
_version_ | 1783485037573832704 |
---|---|
author | Nanda, Payal Morris, Allyn Kelemen, Jessica Yang, Jane Wiest, Michael C. |
author_facet | Nanda, Payal Morris, Allyn Kelemen, Jessica Yang, Jane Wiest, Michael C. |
author_sort | Nanda, Payal |
collection | PubMed |
description | To characterize the rat as a potential model of frontal-parietal auditory processing during sustained attention, target detection, and response inhibition, we recorded field potentials (FPs) at multiple sites in medial-dorsal frontal and posterior parietal cortex simultaneously while rats performed an equiprobable auditory go/no-go discrimination task. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were calculated by averaging tone-triggered FPs across hit, miss, false alarm (FA), and correct rejection (CR) trials separately for each recording session, and five peak amplitudes (termed N1, P2, N2, P3E, and P3L) were extracted from the individual-session ERPs. Comparing peak amplitudes across different trials types indicated a statistically significant amplification of the P2 peak on hit trials that accompanies detection of the target tone prior to the behavioral go response. This result appears analogous to human ERP phenomena during auditory target discrimination. Conversely, the rat P3 responses were not associated with target detection as in the human ERP literature. Likewise, we did not observe the “no-go N2” or “no-go P3” responses reported in the human literature in association with response inhibition, which might reflect differences in task context or a difference in auditory processing between rats and humans. We also present analyses of stimulus-induced spectral power and interarea coherence to characterize oscillatory synchronization which may contribute to ERPs, and discuss possible error-related processing at the N2, P3E, and P3L peaks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6944478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69444782020-01-07 Evoked Frontal and Parietal Field Potential Signatures of Target Detection and Response Inhibition in Rats Performing an Equiprobable Auditory Go/No-Go Task Nanda, Payal Morris, Allyn Kelemen, Jessica Yang, Jane Wiest, Michael C. eNeuro New Research To characterize the rat as a potential model of frontal-parietal auditory processing during sustained attention, target detection, and response inhibition, we recorded field potentials (FPs) at multiple sites in medial-dorsal frontal and posterior parietal cortex simultaneously while rats performed an equiprobable auditory go/no-go discrimination task. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were calculated by averaging tone-triggered FPs across hit, miss, false alarm (FA), and correct rejection (CR) trials separately for each recording session, and five peak amplitudes (termed N1, P2, N2, P3E, and P3L) were extracted from the individual-session ERPs. Comparing peak amplitudes across different trials types indicated a statistically significant amplification of the P2 peak on hit trials that accompanies detection of the target tone prior to the behavioral go response. This result appears analogous to human ERP phenomena during auditory target discrimination. Conversely, the rat P3 responses were not associated with target detection as in the human ERP literature. Likewise, we did not observe the “no-go N2” or “no-go P3” responses reported in the human literature in association with response inhibition, which might reflect differences in task context or a difference in auditory processing between rats and humans. We also present analyses of stimulus-induced spectral power and interarea coherence to characterize oscillatory synchronization which may contribute to ERPs, and discuss possible error-related processing at the N2, P3E, and P3L peaks. Society for Neuroscience 2020-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6944478/ /pubmed/31767572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0055-19.2019 Text en Copyright © 2020 Nanda et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | New Research Nanda, Payal Morris, Allyn Kelemen, Jessica Yang, Jane Wiest, Michael C. Evoked Frontal and Parietal Field Potential Signatures of Target Detection and Response Inhibition in Rats Performing an Equiprobable Auditory Go/No-Go Task |
title | Evoked Frontal and Parietal Field Potential Signatures of Target Detection and Response Inhibition in Rats Performing an Equiprobable Auditory Go/No-Go Task |
title_full | Evoked Frontal and Parietal Field Potential Signatures of Target Detection and Response Inhibition in Rats Performing an Equiprobable Auditory Go/No-Go Task |
title_fullStr | Evoked Frontal and Parietal Field Potential Signatures of Target Detection and Response Inhibition in Rats Performing an Equiprobable Auditory Go/No-Go Task |
title_full_unstemmed | Evoked Frontal and Parietal Field Potential Signatures of Target Detection and Response Inhibition in Rats Performing an Equiprobable Auditory Go/No-Go Task |
title_short | Evoked Frontal and Parietal Field Potential Signatures of Target Detection and Response Inhibition in Rats Performing an Equiprobable Auditory Go/No-Go Task |
title_sort | evoked frontal and parietal field potential signatures of target detection and response inhibition in rats performing an equiprobable auditory go/no-go task |
topic | New Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6944478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31767572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0055-19.2019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nandapayal evokedfrontalandparietalfieldpotentialsignaturesoftargetdetectionandresponseinhibitioninratsperforminganequiprobableauditorygonogotask AT morrisallyn evokedfrontalandparietalfieldpotentialsignaturesoftargetdetectionandresponseinhibitioninratsperforminganequiprobableauditorygonogotask AT kelemenjessica evokedfrontalandparietalfieldpotentialsignaturesoftargetdetectionandresponseinhibitioninratsperforminganequiprobableauditorygonogotask AT yangjane evokedfrontalandparietalfieldpotentialsignaturesoftargetdetectionandresponseinhibitioninratsperforminganequiprobableauditorygonogotask AT wiestmichaelc evokedfrontalandparietalfieldpotentialsignaturesoftargetdetectionandresponseinhibitioninratsperforminganequiprobableauditorygonogotask |