Cargando…

Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence — Is It the Best Option?

Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) can undoubtedly reduce quality of life and promote personal distress and psychosocial alienation. The frequency of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) counts on the characterization of urinary incontinence and the periods of patient follow-up. Operatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ha, Yun-Sok, Yoo, Eun Sang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Continence Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6944792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31905273
http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938210.105
_version_ 1783485073379557376
author Ha, Yun-Sok
Yoo, Eun Sang
author_facet Ha, Yun-Sok
Yoo, Eun Sang
author_sort Ha, Yun-Sok
collection PubMed
description Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) can undoubtedly reduce quality of life and promote personal distress and psychosocial alienation. The frequency of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) counts on the characterization of urinary incontinence and the periods of patient follow-up. Operational therapeutics, for instance, urethral male slings and artificial urinary sphincters, are well-chosen as adequate and secure surgeries for male SUI in men with continual PPI when conservative treatment is ineffective. Over the former 2 decades, surgery has progressed regarding both operative approach and sling architecture. However, there are no guidelines about when surgery should be carried out and which is the most appropriate surgical option. In this review, we summarize recent advances in implantable devices for PPI and also discuss traditional surgical care. When we are planning the male PPI surgery, careful preoperative work-up should be performed and surgical method should be chosen according to the severity of the disease. Male sling is preferred in mild and moderate symptomatic patients with normal detrusor pressure and it is recommended to select traditional artificial urinary sphincter device in those with severe symptoms. It is expected that effective devices without adverse events will be developed with technical advances in near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6944792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Continence Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69447922020-01-14 Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence — Is It the Best Option? Ha, Yun-Sok Yoo, Eun Sang Int Neurourol J Review Article Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) can undoubtedly reduce quality of life and promote personal distress and psychosocial alienation. The frequency of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) counts on the characterization of urinary incontinence and the periods of patient follow-up. Operational therapeutics, for instance, urethral male slings and artificial urinary sphincters, are well-chosen as adequate and secure surgeries for male SUI in men with continual PPI when conservative treatment is ineffective. Over the former 2 decades, surgery has progressed regarding both operative approach and sling architecture. However, there are no guidelines about when surgery should be carried out and which is the most appropriate surgical option. In this review, we summarize recent advances in implantable devices for PPI and also discuss traditional surgical care. When we are planning the male PPI surgery, careful preoperative work-up should be performed and surgical method should be chosen according to the severity of the disease. Male sling is preferred in mild and moderate symptomatic patients with normal detrusor pressure and it is recommended to select traditional artificial urinary sphincter device in those with severe symptoms. It is expected that effective devices without adverse events will be developed with technical advances in near future. Korean Continence Society 2019-12 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6944792/ /pubmed/31905273 http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938210.105 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Continence Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ha, Yun-Sok
Yoo, Eun Sang
Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence — Is It the Best Option?
title Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence — Is It the Best Option?
title_full Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence — Is It the Best Option?
title_fullStr Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence — Is It the Best Option?
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence — Is It the Best Option?
title_short Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence — Is It the Best Option?
title_sort artificial urinary sphincter for postradical prostatectomy urinary incontinence — is it the best option?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6944792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31905273
http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938210.105
work_keys_str_mv AT hayunsok artificialurinarysphincterforpostradicalprostatectomyurinaryincontinenceisitthebestoption
AT yooeunsang artificialurinarysphincterforpostradicalprostatectomyurinaryincontinenceisitthebestoption