Cargando…
Why (and how) we should publish negative data
Negative data and refutations are a crucial element of the scientific process. But it needs solid arguments to convince editors and reviewers to publish negative results. [Image: see text]
Autores principales: | Nimpf, Simon, Keays, David A |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858691 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201949775 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Publishing a Paper during Residency for Specialists: How Should We Deal with It?
por: Matsubara, Shigeki, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Clinical studies in the elderly – Why and how should we care?
por: Sousa, Nuno
Publicado: (2021) -
How should we use imaging in the determination of brainstem death?
por: Ramachandran, Sanjeev, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Installation of CCTVs in Operating Rooms, How Should We Prepare?
por: Kim, Do-Kyong
Publicado: (2022) -
How should we interpret estimates of individual repeatability?
por: Wilson, Alastair J.
Publicado: (2018)