Cargando…

Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels may serve as a non-invasive biomarker of a broad spectrum of acute and chronic pathologies. However, in order to make clinical decisions based on cfDNA measurements, it is essential to understand the magnitude of biological va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madsen, Anne Tranberg, Hojbjerg, Johanne Andersen, Sorensen, Boe Sandahl, Winther-Larsen, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31648993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.10.008
_version_ 1783485141360836608
author Madsen, Anne Tranberg
Hojbjerg, Johanne Andersen
Sorensen, Boe Sandahl
Winther-Larsen, Anne
author_facet Madsen, Anne Tranberg
Hojbjerg, Johanne Andersen
Sorensen, Boe Sandahl
Winther-Larsen, Anne
author_sort Madsen, Anne Tranberg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels may serve as a non-invasive biomarker of a broad spectrum of acute and chronic pathologies. However, in order to make clinical decisions based on cfDNA measurements, it is essential to understand the magnitude of biological variation so this variation is not confused with a variation that actually represent a clinically relevant change. The present study was designed to evaluate the biological variation of cfDNA in healthy subjects and lung cancer patients. METHODS: Plasma samples were collected from 33 healthy subjects and ten lung cancer patients over three days, as well as during the same day. CfDNA was quantified using droplet digital PCR. Biological variation data was estimated using mixed models. FINDINGS: The within-subject variation was 25% and the between-subject variation was 30%. The reference change value for the healthy subjects was 70%. There was no systematic difference in cfDNA levels from day-to-day (p = 0⋅61), but there was a significant decline during the day (p<0⋅01). The within-subject variation in cancer patients was comparable to healthy subjects, whereas the between-subject variation was much larger (139%). No systematic differences from day-to-day were observed for the cancer patients (p>0⋅3). INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that cfDNA levels fluctuate significantly during the day and exhibit considerable within-subject variation. Thus, the data presented offer a substantial contribution to the interpretation of the clinical significance of cfDNA. FUNDING: Læge Sofus Carl Emil Friis og hustru Olga Doris Friis' Legat, Harboefonden, and Dagmar Marshalls Fond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6945267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69452672020-01-09 Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA Madsen, Anne Tranberg Hojbjerg, Johanne Andersen Sorensen, Boe Sandahl Winther-Larsen, Anne EBioMedicine Research paper BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels may serve as a non-invasive biomarker of a broad spectrum of acute and chronic pathologies. However, in order to make clinical decisions based on cfDNA measurements, it is essential to understand the magnitude of biological variation so this variation is not confused with a variation that actually represent a clinically relevant change. The present study was designed to evaluate the biological variation of cfDNA in healthy subjects and lung cancer patients. METHODS: Plasma samples were collected from 33 healthy subjects and ten lung cancer patients over three days, as well as during the same day. CfDNA was quantified using droplet digital PCR. Biological variation data was estimated using mixed models. FINDINGS: The within-subject variation was 25% and the between-subject variation was 30%. The reference change value for the healthy subjects was 70%. There was no systematic difference in cfDNA levels from day-to-day (p = 0⋅61), but there was a significant decline during the day (p<0⋅01). The within-subject variation in cancer patients was comparable to healthy subjects, whereas the between-subject variation was much larger (139%). No systematic differences from day-to-day were observed for the cancer patients (p>0⋅3). INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that cfDNA levels fluctuate significantly during the day and exhibit considerable within-subject variation. Thus, the data presented offer a substantial contribution to the interpretation of the clinical significance of cfDNA. FUNDING: Læge Sofus Carl Emil Friis og hustru Olga Doris Friis' Legat, Harboefonden, and Dagmar Marshalls Fond. Elsevier 2019-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6945267/ /pubmed/31648993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.10.008 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research paper
Madsen, Anne Tranberg
Hojbjerg, Johanne Andersen
Sorensen, Boe Sandahl
Winther-Larsen, Anne
Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA
title Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA
title_full Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA
title_fullStr Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA
title_full_unstemmed Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA
title_short Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA
title_sort day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free dna
topic Research paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31648993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.10.008
work_keys_str_mv AT madsenannetranberg daytodayandwithindaybiologicalvariationofcellfreedna
AT hojbjergjohanneandersen daytodayandwithindaybiologicalvariationofcellfreedna
AT sorensenboesandahl daytodayandwithindaybiologicalvariationofcellfreedna
AT wintherlarsenanne daytodayandwithindaybiologicalvariationofcellfreedna