Cargando…

Spondylodiscitis after minimally invasive recto- and colpo-sacropexy: Report of a case and systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Rectopexy and colpopexy are established surgical techniques to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Spondylodiscitis (SD) after rectopexy and colpopexy represents a rare infectious complication with severe consequences. We presented a case of SD after rectopexy and performed a systematic review....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Philip C., Berchtold, Caroline, Kuemmerli, Christoph, Ruzza, Claudio, Z'Graggen, Kaspar, Steinemann, Daniel C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30416143
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_235_18
_version_ 1783485158286950400
author Müller, Philip C.
Berchtold, Caroline
Kuemmerli, Christoph
Ruzza, Claudio
Z'Graggen, Kaspar
Steinemann, Daniel C.
author_facet Müller, Philip C.
Berchtold, Caroline
Kuemmerli, Christoph
Ruzza, Claudio
Z'Graggen, Kaspar
Steinemann, Daniel C.
author_sort Müller, Philip C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rectopexy and colpopexy are established surgical techniques to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Spondylodiscitis (SD) after rectopexy and colpopexy represents a rare infectious complication with severe consequences. We presented a case of SD after rectopexy and performed a systematic review. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify case reports or case series reporting on SD after rectopexy or colpopexy. The main outcomes measures were time from initial surgery to SD, presenting symptoms, occurrence of mesh erosion or fistula formation and type of treatment. RESULTS: Forty-one females with a median age of 59 (54–66) years were diagnosed with SD after a median of 76 (30–165) days after initial surgery. Most common presenting symptoms were back pain (n = 35), fever (n = 20), pain radiation in the legs (n = 9) and vaginal discharge (n = 6). A mesh erosion (n = 8) or fistula formation (n = 7) was detected in a minority of cases. The treatment of SD consisted of conservative treatment with antibiotics alone in 29%, whereas 66% of the patients had to undergo additional surgical treatment. If a revision surgery was necessary, more than one intervention was performed in 40%. Mesh and tack excision was performed in most cases (n = 21), whereas a neurosurgical intervention was necessary in 10 patients. CONCLUSION: Although a rare complication, surgeons performing rectopexy and colpopexy must be aware of the potential risk of SD Careful suture or tack placement into the anterior longitudinal ligament at the level of the promontory while avoiding the disc space is of paramount importance. Prompt diagnosis and multidisciplinary management are the cornerstones of a successful treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6945346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69453462020-01-13 Spondylodiscitis after minimally invasive recto- and colpo-sacropexy: Report of a case and systematic review of the literature Müller, Philip C. Berchtold, Caroline Kuemmerli, Christoph Ruzza, Claudio Z'Graggen, Kaspar Steinemann, Daniel C. J Minim Access Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Rectopexy and colpopexy are established surgical techniques to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Spondylodiscitis (SD) after rectopexy and colpopexy represents a rare infectious complication with severe consequences. We presented a case of SD after rectopexy and performed a systematic review. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify case reports or case series reporting on SD after rectopexy or colpopexy. The main outcomes measures were time from initial surgery to SD, presenting symptoms, occurrence of mesh erosion or fistula formation and type of treatment. RESULTS: Forty-one females with a median age of 59 (54–66) years were diagnosed with SD after a median of 76 (30–165) days after initial surgery. Most common presenting symptoms were back pain (n = 35), fever (n = 20), pain radiation in the legs (n = 9) and vaginal discharge (n = 6). A mesh erosion (n = 8) or fistula formation (n = 7) was detected in a minority of cases. The treatment of SD consisted of conservative treatment with antibiotics alone in 29%, whereas 66% of the patients had to undergo additional surgical treatment. If a revision surgery was necessary, more than one intervention was performed in 40%. Mesh and tack excision was performed in most cases (n = 21), whereas a neurosurgical intervention was necessary in 10 patients. CONCLUSION: Although a rare complication, surgeons performing rectopexy and colpopexy must be aware of the potential risk of SD Careful suture or tack placement into the anterior longitudinal ligament at the level of the promontory while avoiding the disc space is of paramount importance. Prompt diagnosis and multidisciplinary management are the cornerstones of a successful treatment. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6945346/ /pubmed/30416143 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_235_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Müller, Philip C.
Berchtold, Caroline
Kuemmerli, Christoph
Ruzza, Claudio
Z'Graggen, Kaspar
Steinemann, Daniel C.
Spondylodiscitis after minimally invasive recto- and colpo-sacropexy: Report of a case and systematic review of the literature
title Spondylodiscitis after minimally invasive recto- and colpo-sacropexy: Report of a case and systematic review of the literature
title_full Spondylodiscitis after minimally invasive recto- and colpo-sacropexy: Report of a case and systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Spondylodiscitis after minimally invasive recto- and colpo-sacropexy: Report of a case and systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Spondylodiscitis after minimally invasive recto- and colpo-sacropexy: Report of a case and systematic review of the literature
title_short Spondylodiscitis after minimally invasive recto- and colpo-sacropexy: Report of a case and systematic review of the literature
title_sort spondylodiscitis after minimally invasive recto- and colpo-sacropexy: report of a case and systematic review of the literature
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30416143
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_235_18
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerphilipc spondylodiscitisafterminimallyinvasiverectoandcolposacropexyreportofacaseandsystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT berchtoldcaroline spondylodiscitisafterminimallyinvasiverectoandcolposacropexyreportofacaseandsystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT kuemmerlichristoph spondylodiscitisafterminimallyinvasiverectoandcolposacropexyreportofacaseandsystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT ruzzaclaudio spondylodiscitisafterminimallyinvasiverectoandcolposacropexyreportofacaseandsystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT zgraggenkaspar spondylodiscitisafterminimallyinvasiverectoandcolposacropexyreportofacaseandsystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT steinemanndanielc spondylodiscitisafterminimallyinvasiverectoandcolposacropexyreportofacaseandsystematicreviewoftheliterature