Cargando…

Measuring women’s experiences of maternity care: protocol for a systematic review of self-report survey instruments

BACKGROUND: The use of survey instruments to measure women’s experiences of their maternity care is regarded internationally as an indicator of the quality of care received. To ensure the credibility of the data arising from these instruments, the methodological quality of development must be high....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beecher, Claire, Greene, Richard, O’Dwyer, Laura, Ryan, Ethel, White, Mark, Beattie, Michelle, Devane, Declan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1261-8
_version_ 1783485187100770304
author Beecher, Claire
Greene, Richard
O’Dwyer, Laura
Ryan, Ethel
White, Mark
Beattie, Michelle
Devane, Declan
author_facet Beecher, Claire
Greene, Richard
O’Dwyer, Laura
Ryan, Ethel
White, Mark
Beattie, Michelle
Devane, Declan
author_sort Beecher, Claire
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of survey instruments to measure women’s experiences of their maternity care is regarded internationally as an indicator of the quality of care received. To ensure the credibility of the data arising from these instruments, the methodological quality of development must be high. This paper reports the protocol for a systematic review of self-report instruments used to measure women’s experiences of their maternity care. METHODS: Citation databases CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE will be searched from 2002 to 2018 using keywords including women, experience, maternity care, questionnaires, surveys, and self-report. Citations will be screened by two reviewers, in two rounds, for inclusion as per predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction forms will be populated with data, extracted from each study, to evaluate the methodological quality of each survey instrument and the criteria for good measurement properties using quality criteria. Data will also be extracted to categorise the items included in each survey instrument. A combination of a structured narrative synthesis and quantitate summaries in tabular format will allow for recommendations to be made on the use, adaptation and development of future survey instruments. DISCUSSION: The value of survey instruments that evaluate women’s experiences of their maternity care, as a marker of quality care, has been recognised internationally with many countries employing the use of such instruments to inform policy and practice. The development of these instruments must be methodologically sound and the instrument itself fit for the purpose and context in which it is used. This protocol describes the methods that will be used to complete a systematic review that will serve as a guide for choosing the most appropriate existing instruments to use or adapt so that they are fit for purpose, in addition to informing the development of new instruments. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018105325
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6945476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69454762020-01-07 Measuring women’s experiences of maternity care: protocol for a systematic review of self-report survey instruments Beecher, Claire Greene, Richard O’Dwyer, Laura Ryan, Ethel White, Mark Beattie, Michelle Devane, Declan Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The use of survey instruments to measure women’s experiences of their maternity care is regarded internationally as an indicator of the quality of care received. To ensure the credibility of the data arising from these instruments, the methodological quality of development must be high. This paper reports the protocol for a systematic review of self-report instruments used to measure women’s experiences of their maternity care. METHODS: Citation databases CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE will be searched from 2002 to 2018 using keywords including women, experience, maternity care, questionnaires, surveys, and self-report. Citations will be screened by two reviewers, in two rounds, for inclusion as per predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction forms will be populated with data, extracted from each study, to evaluate the methodological quality of each survey instrument and the criteria for good measurement properties using quality criteria. Data will also be extracted to categorise the items included in each survey instrument. A combination of a structured narrative synthesis and quantitate summaries in tabular format will allow for recommendations to be made on the use, adaptation and development of future survey instruments. DISCUSSION: The value of survey instruments that evaluate women’s experiences of their maternity care, as a marker of quality care, has been recognised internationally with many countries employing the use of such instruments to inform policy and practice. The development of these instruments must be methodologically sound and the instrument itself fit for the purpose and context in which it is used. This protocol describes the methods that will be used to complete a systematic review that will serve as a guide for choosing the most appropriate existing instruments to use or adapt so that they are fit for purpose, in addition to informing the development of new instruments. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018105325 BioMed Central 2020-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6945476/ /pubmed/31907051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1261-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Beecher, Claire
Greene, Richard
O’Dwyer, Laura
Ryan, Ethel
White, Mark
Beattie, Michelle
Devane, Declan
Measuring women’s experiences of maternity care: protocol for a systematic review of self-report survey instruments
title Measuring women’s experiences of maternity care: protocol for a systematic review of self-report survey instruments
title_full Measuring women’s experiences of maternity care: protocol for a systematic review of self-report survey instruments
title_fullStr Measuring women’s experiences of maternity care: protocol for a systematic review of self-report survey instruments
title_full_unstemmed Measuring women’s experiences of maternity care: protocol for a systematic review of self-report survey instruments
title_short Measuring women’s experiences of maternity care: protocol for a systematic review of self-report survey instruments
title_sort measuring women’s experiences of maternity care: protocol for a systematic review of self-report survey instruments
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1261-8
work_keys_str_mv AT beecherclaire measuringwomensexperiencesofmaternitycareprotocolforasystematicreviewofselfreportsurveyinstruments
AT greenerichard measuringwomensexperiencesofmaternitycareprotocolforasystematicreviewofselfreportsurveyinstruments
AT odwyerlaura measuringwomensexperiencesofmaternitycareprotocolforasystematicreviewofselfreportsurveyinstruments
AT ryanethel measuringwomensexperiencesofmaternitycareprotocolforasystematicreviewofselfreportsurveyinstruments
AT whitemark measuringwomensexperiencesofmaternitycareprotocolforasystematicreviewofselfreportsurveyinstruments
AT beattiemichelle measuringwomensexperiencesofmaternitycareprotocolforasystematicreviewofselfreportsurveyinstruments
AT devanedeclan measuringwomensexperiencesofmaternitycareprotocolforasystematicreviewofselfreportsurveyinstruments