Cargando…

Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®) patient-reported outcome instrument

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome measure, in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration guidance, to capture the impact of systemic sclerosis-related digital ulcers (SSc-DUs) on hand function. Psychometric analyses were conducted to evaluate and document the measur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mouthon, Luc, Poiraudeau, Serge, Vernon, Margaret, Papadakis, Kelly, Perchenet, Loïc, Khanna, Dinesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-2087-4
_version_ 1783485196459311104
author Mouthon, Luc
Poiraudeau, Serge
Vernon, Margaret
Papadakis, Kelly
Perchenet, Loïc
Khanna, Dinesh
author_facet Mouthon, Luc
Poiraudeau, Serge
Vernon, Margaret
Papadakis, Kelly
Perchenet, Loïc
Khanna, Dinesh
author_sort Mouthon, Luc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome measure, in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration guidance, to capture the impact of systemic sclerosis-related digital ulcers (SSc-DUs) on hand function. Psychometric analyses were conducted to evaluate and document the measurement properties of the resulting instrument—the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®). METHODS: The HDISS-DU was developed through a series of confirmatory, qualitative concept-elicitation interviews (N = 36) to provide supportive evidence that the instrument captures all relevant issues and functional limitations relating to SSc-DUs in this patient population. Psychometric analyses used blinded data from two randomised, controlled, phase 3 trials in patients with SSc-DUs (N = 517). The analyses included assessment of reliability, construct validity, responsiveness and thresholds for meaningful change. RESULTS: Qualitative interviews confirmed that the HDISS-DU had good content coverage and patients understood the HDISS-DU instructions, items and response scale. The HDISS-DU demonstrated excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability, with satisfactory construct validity. Overall, the HDISS-DU was highly responsive to change in digital ulcer severity: the no-change group (for other criterion measures) had mean differences and effect sizes close to 0, while mean differences were mostly negative (indicating improvement) for the improvement groups (for other criterion measures) and vice versa. The preliminary threshold for meaningful change was a 0.50 difference in HDISS-DU score. CONCLUSIONS: Using data from two large studies of SSc-DU patients, these psychometric analyses support the reliability, validity, discriminating ability and responsiveness to change of the HDISS-DU for evaluating treatment outcomes in future clinical studies and clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6945532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69455322020-01-07 Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®) patient-reported outcome instrument Mouthon, Luc Poiraudeau, Serge Vernon, Margaret Papadakis, Kelly Perchenet, Loïc Khanna, Dinesh Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome measure, in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration guidance, to capture the impact of systemic sclerosis-related digital ulcers (SSc-DUs) on hand function. Psychometric analyses were conducted to evaluate and document the measurement properties of the resulting instrument—the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®). METHODS: The HDISS-DU was developed through a series of confirmatory, qualitative concept-elicitation interviews (N = 36) to provide supportive evidence that the instrument captures all relevant issues and functional limitations relating to SSc-DUs in this patient population. Psychometric analyses used blinded data from two randomised, controlled, phase 3 trials in patients with SSc-DUs (N = 517). The analyses included assessment of reliability, construct validity, responsiveness and thresholds for meaningful change. RESULTS: Qualitative interviews confirmed that the HDISS-DU had good content coverage and patients understood the HDISS-DU instructions, items and response scale. The HDISS-DU demonstrated excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability, with satisfactory construct validity. Overall, the HDISS-DU was highly responsive to change in digital ulcer severity: the no-change group (for other criterion measures) had mean differences and effect sizes close to 0, while mean differences were mostly negative (indicating improvement) for the improvement groups (for other criterion measures) and vice versa. The preliminary threshold for meaningful change was a 0.50 difference in HDISS-DU score. CONCLUSIONS: Using data from two large studies of SSc-DU patients, these psychometric analyses support the reliability, validity, discriminating ability and responsiveness to change of the HDISS-DU for evaluating treatment outcomes in future clinical studies and clinical practice. BioMed Central 2020-01-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6945532/ /pubmed/31907061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-2087-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mouthon, Luc
Poiraudeau, Serge
Vernon, Margaret
Papadakis, Kelly
Perchenet, Loïc
Khanna, Dinesh
Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®) patient-reported outcome instrument
title Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®) patient-reported outcome instrument
title_full Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®) patient-reported outcome instrument
title_fullStr Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®) patient-reported outcome instrument
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®) patient-reported outcome instrument
title_short Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®) patient-reported outcome instrument
title_sort psychometric validation of the hand disability in systemic sclerosis-digital ulcers (hdiss-du®) patient-reported outcome instrument
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-2087-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mouthonluc psychometricvalidationofthehanddisabilityinsystemicsclerosisdigitalulcershdissdupatientreportedoutcomeinstrument
AT poiraudeauserge psychometricvalidationofthehanddisabilityinsystemicsclerosisdigitalulcershdissdupatientreportedoutcomeinstrument
AT vernonmargaret psychometricvalidationofthehanddisabilityinsystemicsclerosisdigitalulcershdissdupatientreportedoutcomeinstrument
AT papadakiskelly psychometricvalidationofthehanddisabilityinsystemicsclerosisdigitalulcershdissdupatientreportedoutcomeinstrument
AT perchenetloic psychometricvalidationofthehanddisabilityinsystemicsclerosisdigitalulcershdissdupatientreportedoutcomeinstrument
AT khannadinesh psychometricvalidationofthehanddisabilityinsystemicsclerosisdigitalulcershdissdupatientreportedoutcomeinstrument