Cargando…
Multi-omic serum biomarkers for prognosis of disease progression in prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: Predicting the clinical course of prostate cancer is challenging due to the wide biological spectrum of the disease. The objective of our study was to identify prostate cancer prognostic markers in patients ‘sera using a multi-omics discovery platform. METHODS: Pre-surgical serum samples...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-02185-y |
_version_ | 1783485232430710784 |
---|---|
author | Kiebish, Michael A. Cullen, Jennifer Mishra, Prachi Ali, Amina Milliman, Eric Rodrigues, Leonardo O. Chen, Emily Y. Tolstikov, Vladimir Zhang, Lixia Panagopoulos, Kiki Shah, Punit Chen, Yongmei Petrovics, Gyorgy Rosner, Inger L. Sesterhenn, Isabell A. McLeod, David G. Granger, Elder Sarangarajan, Rangaprasad Akmaev, Viatcheslav Srinivasan, Alagarsamy Srivastava, Shiv Narain, Niven R. Dobi, Albert |
author_facet | Kiebish, Michael A. Cullen, Jennifer Mishra, Prachi Ali, Amina Milliman, Eric Rodrigues, Leonardo O. Chen, Emily Y. Tolstikov, Vladimir Zhang, Lixia Panagopoulos, Kiki Shah, Punit Chen, Yongmei Petrovics, Gyorgy Rosner, Inger L. Sesterhenn, Isabell A. McLeod, David G. Granger, Elder Sarangarajan, Rangaprasad Akmaev, Viatcheslav Srinivasan, Alagarsamy Srivastava, Shiv Narain, Niven R. Dobi, Albert |
author_sort | Kiebish, Michael A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Predicting the clinical course of prostate cancer is challenging due to the wide biological spectrum of the disease. The objective of our study was to identify prostate cancer prognostic markers in patients ‘sera using a multi-omics discovery platform. METHODS: Pre-surgical serum samples collected from a longitudinal, racially diverse, prostate cancer patient cohort (N = 382) were examined. Linear Regression and Bayesian computational approaches integrated with multi-omics, were used to select markers to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR). BCR-free survival was modeled using unadjusted Kaplan–Meier estimation curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, adjusted for key pathologic variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve statistics were used to examine the predictive value of markers in discriminating BCR events from non-events. The findings were further validated by creating a training set (N = 267) and testing set (N = 115) from the cohort. RESULTS: Among 382 patients, 72 (19%) experienced a BCR event in a median follow-up time of 6.9 years. Two proteins—Tenascin C (TNC) and Apolipoprotein A1V (Apo-AIV), one metabolite—1-Methyladenosine (1-MA) and one phospholipid molecular species phosphatidic acid (PA) 18:0-22:0 showed a cumulative predictive performance of AUC = 0.78 [OR (95% CI) = 6.56 (2.98–14.40), P < 0.05], in differentiating patients with and without BCR event. In the validation set all four metabolites consistently reproduced an equivalent performance with high negative predictive value (NPV; > 80%) for BCR. The combination of pTstage and Gleason score with the analytes, further increased the sensitivity [AUC = 0.89, 95% (CI) = 4.45–32.05, P < 0.05], with an increased NPV (0.96) and OR (12.4) for BCR. The panel of markers combined with the pathological parameters demonstrated a more accurate prediction of BCR than the pathological parameters alone in prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a panel of serum analytes were identified that complemented pathologic patient features in predicting prostate cancer progression. This panel offers a new opportunity to complement current prognostic markers and to monitor the potential impact of primary treatment versus surveillance on patient oncological outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6945688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69456882020-01-09 Multi-omic serum biomarkers for prognosis of disease progression in prostate cancer Kiebish, Michael A. Cullen, Jennifer Mishra, Prachi Ali, Amina Milliman, Eric Rodrigues, Leonardo O. Chen, Emily Y. Tolstikov, Vladimir Zhang, Lixia Panagopoulos, Kiki Shah, Punit Chen, Yongmei Petrovics, Gyorgy Rosner, Inger L. Sesterhenn, Isabell A. McLeod, David G. Granger, Elder Sarangarajan, Rangaprasad Akmaev, Viatcheslav Srinivasan, Alagarsamy Srivastava, Shiv Narain, Niven R. Dobi, Albert J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Predicting the clinical course of prostate cancer is challenging due to the wide biological spectrum of the disease. The objective of our study was to identify prostate cancer prognostic markers in patients ‘sera using a multi-omics discovery platform. METHODS: Pre-surgical serum samples collected from a longitudinal, racially diverse, prostate cancer patient cohort (N = 382) were examined. Linear Regression and Bayesian computational approaches integrated with multi-omics, were used to select markers to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR). BCR-free survival was modeled using unadjusted Kaplan–Meier estimation curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, adjusted for key pathologic variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve statistics were used to examine the predictive value of markers in discriminating BCR events from non-events. The findings were further validated by creating a training set (N = 267) and testing set (N = 115) from the cohort. RESULTS: Among 382 patients, 72 (19%) experienced a BCR event in a median follow-up time of 6.9 years. Two proteins—Tenascin C (TNC) and Apolipoprotein A1V (Apo-AIV), one metabolite—1-Methyladenosine (1-MA) and one phospholipid molecular species phosphatidic acid (PA) 18:0-22:0 showed a cumulative predictive performance of AUC = 0.78 [OR (95% CI) = 6.56 (2.98–14.40), P < 0.05], in differentiating patients with and without BCR event. In the validation set all four metabolites consistently reproduced an equivalent performance with high negative predictive value (NPV; > 80%) for BCR. The combination of pTstage and Gleason score with the analytes, further increased the sensitivity [AUC = 0.89, 95% (CI) = 4.45–32.05, P < 0.05], with an increased NPV (0.96) and OR (12.4) for BCR. The panel of markers combined with the pathological parameters demonstrated a more accurate prediction of BCR than the pathological parameters alone in prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a panel of serum analytes were identified that complemented pathologic patient features in predicting prostate cancer progression. This panel offers a new opportunity to complement current prognostic markers and to monitor the potential impact of primary treatment versus surveillance on patient oncological outcome. BioMed Central 2020-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6945688/ /pubmed/31910880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-02185-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kiebish, Michael A. Cullen, Jennifer Mishra, Prachi Ali, Amina Milliman, Eric Rodrigues, Leonardo O. Chen, Emily Y. Tolstikov, Vladimir Zhang, Lixia Panagopoulos, Kiki Shah, Punit Chen, Yongmei Petrovics, Gyorgy Rosner, Inger L. Sesterhenn, Isabell A. McLeod, David G. Granger, Elder Sarangarajan, Rangaprasad Akmaev, Viatcheslav Srinivasan, Alagarsamy Srivastava, Shiv Narain, Niven R. Dobi, Albert Multi-omic serum biomarkers for prognosis of disease progression in prostate cancer |
title | Multi-omic serum biomarkers for prognosis of disease progression in prostate cancer |
title_full | Multi-omic serum biomarkers for prognosis of disease progression in prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Multi-omic serum biomarkers for prognosis of disease progression in prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-omic serum biomarkers for prognosis of disease progression in prostate cancer |
title_short | Multi-omic serum biomarkers for prognosis of disease progression in prostate cancer |
title_sort | multi-omic serum biomarkers for prognosis of disease progression in prostate cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-02185-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiebishmichaela multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT cullenjennifer multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT mishraprachi multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT aliamina multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT millimaneric multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT rodriguesleonardoo multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT chenemilyy multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT tolstikovvladimir multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT zhanglixia multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT panagopouloskiki multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT shahpunit multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT chenyongmei multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT petrovicsgyorgy multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT rosneringerl multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT sesterhennisabella multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT mcleoddavidg multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT grangerelder multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT sarangarajanrangaprasad multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT akmaevviatcheslav multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT srinivasanalagarsamy multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT srivastavashiv multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT narainnivenr multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer AT dobialbert multiomicserumbiomarkersforprognosisofdiseaseprogressioninprostatecancer |