Cargando…
EU Health Policy, Coherence, Stakeholder Diversity and Their Impact on the EMA
Innovation is a major pillar in bringing new, targeted medicines to patients. In the health arena, this means the translation of knowledge into what we can call “value.” The latter covers the value to patients but must also take into account value to healthcare systems, society and, of course, manuf...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000481301 |
_version_ | 1783485260141428736 |
---|---|
author | Horgan, Denis Kent, Alastair |
author_facet | Horgan, Denis Kent, Alastair |
author_sort | Horgan, Denis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Innovation is a major pillar in bringing new, targeted medicines to patients. In the health arena, this means the translation of knowledge into what we can call “value.” The latter covers the value to patients but must also take into account value to healthcare systems, society and, of course, manufacturers. The EU has recognised that innovations in healthcare can contribute to the health and well-being of citizens and patients through access to new products, services and treatments with added value. It is also aware that in order to stimulate development, there is a need to facilitate the translation of scientific advances into innovative medicinal products that meet regulatory standards, accelerate patients' access to new therapies and are affordable to Member States' health systems. Early dialogue between technology developers, regulators, health technology assessment and, where relevant, pricing bodies will promote innovation and quicker access to medicines at affordable prices, for the benefit of patients. But while uncertainties in healthcare policy still exist, a request by the European Ombudsman to the European Medicines Agency to provide more information about its early dialogue procedures questions the above “early dialogue” principal. It raises the issue of what the EU aims to do with its health regulation in bringing innovation to the patient. Is this added uncertainty about the hereto trusted role of the EMA a welcome development? Not necessarily. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6945918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | S. Karger AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69459182020-01-27 EU Health Policy, Coherence, Stakeholder Diversity and Their Impact on the EMA Horgan, Denis Kent, Alastair Biomed Hub Article Innovation is a major pillar in bringing new, targeted medicines to patients. In the health arena, this means the translation of knowledge into what we can call “value.” The latter covers the value to patients but must also take into account value to healthcare systems, society and, of course, manufacturers. The EU has recognised that innovations in healthcare can contribute to the health and well-being of citizens and patients through access to new products, services and treatments with added value. It is also aware that in order to stimulate development, there is a need to facilitate the translation of scientific advances into innovative medicinal products that meet regulatory standards, accelerate patients' access to new therapies and are affordable to Member States' health systems. Early dialogue between technology developers, regulators, health technology assessment and, where relevant, pricing bodies will promote innovation and quicker access to medicines at affordable prices, for the benefit of patients. But while uncertainties in healthcare policy still exist, a request by the European Ombudsman to the European Medicines Agency to provide more information about its early dialogue procedures questions the above “early dialogue” principal. It raises the issue of what the EU aims to do with its health regulation in bringing innovation to the patient. Is this added uncertainty about the hereto trusted role of the EMA a welcome development? Not necessarily. S. Karger AG 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6945918/ /pubmed/31988949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000481301 Text en Copyright © 2017 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. |
spellingShingle | Article Horgan, Denis Kent, Alastair EU Health Policy, Coherence, Stakeholder Diversity and Their Impact on the EMA |
title | EU Health Policy, Coherence, Stakeholder Diversity and Their Impact on the EMA |
title_full | EU Health Policy, Coherence, Stakeholder Diversity and Their Impact on the EMA |
title_fullStr | EU Health Policy, Coherence, Stakeholder Diversity and Their Impact on the EMA |
title_full_unstemmed | EU Health Policy, Coherence, Stakeholder Diversity and Their Impact on the EMA |
title_short | EU Health Policy, Coherence, Stakeholder Diversity and Their Impact on the EMA |
title_sort | eu health policy, coherence, stakeholder diversity and their impact on the ema |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000481301 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horgandenis euhealthpolicycoherencestakeholderdiversityandtheirimpactontheema AT kentalastair euhealthpolicycoherencestakeholderdiversityandtheirimpactontheema |