Cargando…
The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients
Some postoperative gastric cancer patients have to terminate systemic intravenous chemotherapy early due to adverse drug reactions. We performed a retrospective study to explore the efficacy and feasibility of sequential therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 55 postoperative gastric cancer patients (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017605 |
_version_ | 1783485306133020672 |
---|---|
author | Yan, Long Liu, Hongbin Li, Hongtao Han, Xiaopeng Cao, Tingbao Wang, Chaoyang Li, Gaitian |
author_facet | Yan, Long Liu, Hongbin Li, Hongtao Han, Xiaopeng Cao, Tingbao Wang, Chaoyang Li, Gaitian |
author_sort | Yan, Long |
collection | PubMed |
description | Some postoperative gastric cancer patients have to terminate systemic intravenous chemotherapy early due to adverse drug reactions. We performed a retrospective study to explore the efficacy and feasibility of sequential therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 55 postoperative gastric cancer patients (Group A) who received sequential therapy (intravenous chemotherapy and S-1) and 53 patients (Group B) who received intravenous chemotherapy from January 2012 to December 2013 in our hospital. The therapeutic effect (including 1-year, 5-year tumor recurrence and survival rate) and the incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed. When death and survival for more than 5 years was regarded as the end point of follow-up, the mean follow-up period was 40.6 months (34.7–46.4) in Group A and 39.2 months (33.0–45.3) in Group B. The 1-year tumor recurrence after the operation was 23.6% (13/55, Group A) and 28.3% (15/53, Group B). The 5-year tumor recurrence was 45.5% (25/55, Group A) and 49.1% (26/53, Group B). There was no significant difference in the 1- and 5-year tumor recurrence rates between these two groups (P > .05). The 1-year survival rates of Group A and Group B were 81.8% (45/55) and 79.2% (42/53), respectively, and the 5-year survival rates of Group A and Group B were 47.3% (26/55) and 45.3% (24/53), respectively. No significant difference was observed between these two treatments at either the 1- or 5-year survival benefit (P > .05). However, the patients in Group A had a lower incidence of gastrointestinal reactions (such as nausea and vomiting), leukopenia and liver function damage (P < .05). We also found that patients who underwent sequential therapy might show lower levels of adverse reactions. Our retrospective study provided some evidence to suggest that sequential treatment is effective and safe for postoperative gastric cancer patients who are intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6946186 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69461862020-01-31 The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients Yan, Long Liu, Hongbin Li, Hongtao Han, Xiaopeng Cao, Tingbao Wang, Chaoyang Li, Gaitian Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 Some postoperative gastric cancer patients have to terminate systemic intravenous chemotherapy early due to adverse drug reactions. We performed a retrospective study to explore the efficacy and feasibility of sequential therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 55 postoperative gastric cancer patients (Group A) who received sequential therapy (intravenous chemotherapy and S-1) and 53 patients (Group B) who received intravenous chemotherapy from January 2012 to December 2013 in our hospital. The therapeutic effect (including 1-year, 5-year tumor recurrence and survival rate) and the incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed. When death and survival for more than 5 years was regarded as the end point of follow-up, the mean follow-up period was 40.6 months (34.7–46.4) in Group A and 39.2 months (33.0–45.3) in Group B. The 1-year tumor recurrence after the operation was 23.6% (13/55, Group A) and 28.3% (15/53, Group B). The 5-year tumor recurrence was 45.5% (25/55, Group A) and 49.1% (26/53, Group B). There was no significant difference in the 1- and 5-year tumor recurrence rates between these two groups (P > .05). The 1-year survival rates of Group A and Group B were 81.8% (45/55) and 79.2% (42/53), respectively, and the 5-year survival rates of Group A and Group B were 47.3% (26/55) and 45.3% (24/53), respectively. No significant difference was observed between these two treatments at either the 1- or 5-year survival benefit (P > .05). However, the patients in Group A had a lower incidence of gastrointestinal reactions (such as nausea and vomiting), leukopenia and liver function damage (P < .05). We also found that patients who underwent sequential therapy might show lower levels of adverse reactions. Our retrospective study provided some evidence to suggest that sequential treatment is effective and safe for postoperative gastric cancer patients who are intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6946186/ /pubmed/31689766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017605 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4500 Yan, Long Liu, Hongbin Li, Hongtao Han, Xiaopeng Cao, Tingbao Wang, Chaoyang Li, Gaitian The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients |
title | The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients |
title_full | The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients |
title_short | The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients |
title_sort | efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral s-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients |
topic | 4500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanlong theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT liuhongbin theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT lihongtao theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT hanxiaopeng theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT caotingbao theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT wangchaoyang theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT ligaitian theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT yanlong efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT liuhongbin efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT lihongtao efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT hanxiaopeng efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT caotingbao efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT wangchaoyang efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients AT ligaitian efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients |