Cargando…

The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients

Some postoperative gastric cancer patients have to terminate systemic intravenous chemotherapy early due to adverse drug reactions. We performed a retrospective study to explore the efficacy and feasibility of sequential therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 55 postoperative gastric cancer patients (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Long, Liu, Hongbin, Li, Hongtao, Han, Xiaopeng, Cao, Tingbao, Wang, Chaoyang, Li, Gaitian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017605
_version_ 1783485306133020672
author Yan, Long
Liu, Hongbin
Li, Hongtao
Han, Xiaopeng
Cao, Tingbao
Wang, Chaoyang
Li, Gaitian
author_facet Yan, Long
Liu, Hongbin
Li, Hongtao
Han, Xiaopeng
Cao, Tingbao
Wang, Chaoyang
Li, Gaitian
author_sort Yan, Long
collection PubMed
description Some postoperative gastric cancer patients have to terminate systemic intravenous chemotherapy early due to adverse drug reactions. We performed a retrospective study to explore the efficacy and feasibility of sequential therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 55 postoperative gastric cancer patients (Group A) who received sequential therapy (intravenous chemotherapy and S-1) and 53 patients (Group B) who received intravenous chemotherapy from January 2012 to December 2013 in our hospital. The therapeutic effect (including 1-year, 5-year tumor recurrence and survival rate) and the incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed. When death and survival for more than 5 years was regarded as the end point of follow-up, the mean follow-up period was 40.6 months (34.7–46.4) in Group A and 39.2 months (33.0–45.3) in Group B. The 1-year tumor recurrence after the operation was 23.6% (13/55, Group A) and 28.3% (15/53, Group B). The 5-year tumor recurrence was 45.5% (25/55, Group A) and 49.1% (26/53, Group B). There was no significant difference in the 1- and 5-year tumor recurrence rates between these two groups (P > .05). The 1-year survival rates of Group A and Group B were 81.8% (45/55) and 79.2% (42/53), respectively, and the 5-year survival rates of Group A and Group B were 47.3% (26/55) and 45.3% (24/53), respectively. No significant difference was observed between these two treatments at either the 1- or 5-year survival benefit (P > .05). However, the patients in Group A had a lower incidence of gastrointestinal reactions (such as nausea and vomiting), leukopenia and liver function damage (P < .05). We also found that patients who underwent sequential therapy might show lower levels of adverse reactions. Our retrospective study provided some evidence to suggest that sequential treatment is effective and safe for postoperative gastric cancer patients who are intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6946186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69461862020-01-31 The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients Yan, Long Liu, Hongbin Li, Hongtao Han, Xiaopeng Cao, Tingbao Wang, Chaoyang Li, Gaitian Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 Some postoperative gastric cancer patients have to terminate systemic intravenous chemotherapy early due to adverse drug reactions. We performed a retrospective study to explore the efficacy and feasibility of sequential therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 55 postoperative gastric cancer patients (Group A) who received sequential therapy (intravenous chemotherapy and S-1) and 53 patients (Group B) who received intravenous chemotherapy from January 2012 to December 2013 in our hospital. The therapeutic effect (including 1-year, 5-year tumor recurrence and survival rate) and the incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed. When death and survival for more than 5 years was regarded as the end point of follow-up, the mean follow-up period was 40.6 months (34.7–46.4) in Group A and 39.2 months (33.0–45.3) in Group B. The 1-year tumor recurrence after the operation was 23.6% (13/55, Group A) and 28.3% (15/53, Group B). The 5-year tumor recurrence was 45.5% (25/55, Group A) and 49.1% (26/53, Group B). There was no significant difference in the 1- and 5-year tumor recurrence rates between these two groups (P > .05). The 1-year survival rates of Group A and Group B were 81.8% (45/55) and 79.2% (42/53), respectively, and the 5-year survival rates of Group A and Group B were 47.3% (26/55) and 45.3% (24/53), respectively. No significant difference was observed between these two treatments at either the 1- or 5-year survival benefit (P > .05). However, the patients in Group A had a lower incidence of gastrointestinal reactions (such as nausea and vomiting), leukopenia and liver function damage (P < .05). We also found that patients who underwent sequential therapy might show lower levels of adverse reactions. Our retrospective study provided some evidence to suggest that sequential treatment is effective and safe for postoperative gastric cancer patients who are intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6946186/ /pubmed/31689766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017605 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Yan, Long
Liu, Hongbin
Li, Hongtao
Han, Xiaopeng
Cao, Tingbao
Wang, Chaoyang
Li, Gaitian
The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients
title The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients
title_full The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients
title_fullStr The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients
title_short The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients
title_sort efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral s-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017605
work_keys_str_mv AT yanlong theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT liuhongbin theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT lihongtao theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT hanxiaopeng theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT caotingbao theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT wangchaoyang theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT ligaitian theefficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT yanlong efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT liuhongbin efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT lihongtao efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT hanxiaopeng efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT caotingbao efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT wangchaoyang efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients
AT ligaitian efficacyandfeasibilityofadoptingintravenouschemotherapyandorals1asasequentialtherapyforpostoperativegastriccancerpatients