Cargando…
Mechanical chest compression with LUCAS device does not improve clinical outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest (CA) is a serious threat to human health. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an effective treatment for CA. Early and high-quality CPR is closely related to the survival rate of patients with CA. But manual chest compression has a lot of defects. To solve the defects a...
Autores principales: | Liu, Mao, Shuai, Zhuang, Ai, Jiao, Tang, Kai, Liu, Hui, Zheng, Jiankang, Gou, Junqi, Lv, Zhan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017550 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of in-hospital use of mechanical chest compression devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: AUTOPULSE vs LUCAS
por: Kim, Hyun Tae, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Use of the LUCAS mechanical chest compression device for percutaneous coronary intervention during cardiac arrest: is it really a game changer?
por: Biondi-Zoccai, G, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority
por: Koster, Rudolph W, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and after introduction of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS-2; a prospective, observational study
por: Tranberg, Tinne, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A data-driven visualization of collaboration, frontier identification, and future trends
por: Li, Yue, et al.
Publicado: (2023)