Cargando…

Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation approach, might be a promising technique in the management of aphasia after cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). This protocol of systematic review (SR) aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Yaling, Zhong, Dongling, Huang, Yijie, He, Mingxing, Xiao, Qiwei, Jin, Rongjiang, Li, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31876757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018561
_version_ 1783485357173506048
author Zheng, Yaling
Zhong, Dongling
Huang, Yijie
He, Mingxing
Xiao, Qiwei
Jin, Rongjiang
Li, Juan
author_facet Zheng, Yaling
Zhong, Dongling
Huang, Yijie
He, Mingxing
Xiao, Qiwei
Jin, Rongjiang
Li, Juan
author_sort Zheng, Yaling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation approach, might be a promising technique in the management of aphasia after cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). This protocol of systematic review (SR) aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of rTMS in patients with aphasia after CVA. METHODS: The following databases will be searched: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Technology Periodical Database (VIP), WanFang Data, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) from inception to August 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness and safety of rTMS for aphasia patients after CVA will be included. Primary outcome will include Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE). Secondary outcomes will include Aphasia Battery of Chinese (ABC), Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT), Aphasia Quotient (AQ), the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA), Aphasia Severity Rating Scale (ASRS), Concise China Aphasia Test Scale (CCAT), Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT), or other related outcomes. Adverse events such as headache, tinnitus, anxiety, fatigue, or epileptic seizure will be considered as safety measurement. Studies screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis will be conducted with Review Manager 5.3 software and R software 3.6.1. RESULTS: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of RCTs on the effectiveness and safety of rTMS as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of aphasia. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of this study will help clinicians and patients with aphasia after CVA to make decision. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No privacy health information will be collected, thus formal ethics approval is not required. The findings of this SR will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019144587.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6946413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69464132020-01-31 Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis Zheng, Yaling Zhong, Dongling Huang, Yijie He, Mingxing Xiao, Qiwei Jin, Rongjiang Li, Juan Medicine (Baltimore) 6300 BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation approach, might be a promising technique in the management of aphasia after cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). This protocol of systematic review (SR) aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of rTMS in patients with aphasia after CVA. METHODS: The following databases will be searched: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Technology Periodical Database (VIP), WanFang Data, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) from inception to August 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness and safety of rTMS for aphasia patients after CVA will be included. Primary outcome will include Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE). Secondary outcomes will include Aphasia Battery of Chinese (ABC), Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT), Aphasia Quotient (AQ), the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA), Aphasia Severity Rating Scale (ASRS), Concise China Aphasia Test Scale (CCAT), Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT), or other related outcomes. Adverse events such as headache, tinnitus, anxiety, fatigue, or epileptic seizure will be considered as safety measurement. Studies screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis will be conducted with Review Manager 5.3 software and R software 3.6.1. RESULTS: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of RCTs on the effectiveness and safety of rTMS as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of aphasia. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of this study will help clinicians and patients with aphasia after CVA to make decision. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No privacy health information will be collected, thus formal ethics approval is not required. The findings of this SR will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019144587. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6946413/ /pubmed/31876757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018561 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 6300
Zheng, Yaling
Zhong, Dongling
Huang, Yijie
He, Mingxing
Xiao, Qiwei
Jin, Rongjiang
Li, Juan
Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rtms) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 6300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31876757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018561
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengyaling effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsonaphasiaincerebrovascularaccidentpatientsprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhongdongling effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsonaphasiaincerebrovascularaccidentpatientsprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangyijie effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsonaphasiaincerebrovascularaccidentpatientsprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hemingxing effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsonaphasiaincerebrovascularaccidentpatientsprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaoqiwei effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsonaphasiaincerebrovascularaccidentpatientsprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinrongjiang effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsonaphasiaincerebrovascularaccidentpatientsprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijuan effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsonaphasiaincerebrovascularaccidentpatientsprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis