Cargando…
Garlic intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
This was a meta-analysis of epidemiological articles that aimed to estimate the association of garlic intake with the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Electronic databases, including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, and EMBASE, were systemically searched from inception to May 201...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31895803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018575 |
_version_ | 1783485367215718400 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Xi Qian, Haihua Zhang, Dan Zeng, Li |
author_facet | Zhou, Xi Qian, Haihua Zhang, Dan Zeng, Li |
author_sort | Zhou, Xi |
collection | PubMed |
description | This was a meta-analysis of epidemiological articles that aimed to estimate the association of garlic intake with the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Electronic databases, including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, and EMBASE, were systemically searched from inception to May 2019 to identify related articles. In addition, a random model was used to pool the included evidence based on heterogeneity. Additionally, subgroup analyses were carried out to examine the differences between different groups. The stability of our findings was tested through sensitivity analyses. Publication bias was also assessed by Egger and Begg tests. Moreover, all enrolled studies were ordered according to the publication year for a cumulative meta-analysis. A total of 11 studies (involving 12,558 cases) were included in the current meta-analysis. Our integrated relative risk (RR) of CRC was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69–0.91) for the highest versus the lowest garlic consumption categories (RR: 0.71 [95% CI, 0.60–0.84] for controls and RR: 0.99 [95% CI, 0.80–1.23] for cohorts). There was significant heterogeneity across all enrolled studies (I(2) = 68.3%, P < .01). The sensitivity analysis revealed no notable alterations of the integrated results. According to the funnel plot regarding garlic intake and the risk of CRC, together with the Egger test (P = .1) and Begg test (P = .064) results, there was no notable evidence of publication bias. The cumulative meta-analysis suggested that the 95% CIs became narrower with the increase in sample size. Based on the existing evidence, garlic intake could reduce the risk of CRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6946456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69464562020-01-31 Garlic intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis Zhou, Xi Qian, Haihua Zhang, Dan Zeng, Li Medicine (Baltimore) 4300 This was a meta-analysis of epidemiological articles that aimed to estimate the association of garlic intake with the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Electronic databases, including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, and EMBASE, were systemically searched from inception to May 2019 to identify related articles. In addition, a random model was used to pool the included evidence based on heterogeneity. Additionally, subgroup analyses were carried out to examine the differences between different groups. The stability of our findings was tested through sensitivity analyses. Publication bias was also assessed by Egger and Begg tests. Moreover, all enrolled studies were ordered according to the publication year for a cumulative meta-analysis. A total of 11 studies (involving 12,558 cases) were included in the current meta-analysis. Our integrated relative risk (RR) of CRC was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69–0.91) for the highest versus the lowest garlic consumption categories (RR: 0.71 [95% CI, 0.60–0.84] for controls and RR: 0.99 [95% CI, 0.80–1.23] for cohorts). There was significant heterogeneity across all enrolled studies (I(2) = 68.3%, P < .01). The sensitivity analysis revealed no notable alterations of the integrated results. According to the funnel plot regarding garlic intake and the risk of CRC, together with the Egger test (P = .1) and Begg test (P = .064) results, there was no notable evidence of publication bias. The cumulative meta-analysis suggested that the 95% CIs became narrower with the increase in sample size. Based on the existing evidence, garlic intake could reduce the risk of CRC. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6946456/ /pubmed/31895803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018575 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4300 Zhou, Xi Qian, Haihua Zhang, Dan Zeng, Li Garlic intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title | Garlic intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Garlic intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Garlic intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Garlic intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Garlic intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | garlic intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | 4300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31895803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018575 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouxi garlicintakeandtheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT qianhaihua garlicintakeandtheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT zhangdan garlicintakeandtheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT zengli garlicintakeandtheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis |