Cargando…
Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)
BACKGROUND: Hospital costs associated with the treatment of rectal cancer are considerable and the formation of a temporary stoma accounts for additional costs. Results from the EASY trial showed that early closure of a temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer postoperative compli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30911920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06732-y |
_version_ | 1783485422362427392 |
---|---|
author | Park, Jennifer Angenete, Eva Bock, David Correa-Marinez, Adiela Danielsen, Anne K. Gehrman, Jacob Haglind, Eva Jansen, Jens E. Skullman, Stefan Wedin, Anette Rosenberg, Jacob |
author_facet | Park, Jennifer Angenete, Eva Bock, David Correa-Marinez, Adiela Danielsen, Anne K. Gehrman, Jacob Haglind, Eva Jansen, Jens E. Skullman, Stefan Wedin, Anette Rosenberg, Jacob |
author_sort | Park, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hospital costs associated with the treatment of rectal cancer are considerable and the formation of a temporary stoma accounts for additional costs. Results from the EASY trial showed that early closure of a temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications but no difference in health-related quality of life up to 12 months after rectal resection. The aim of the present study was to perform a cost analysis within the framework of the EASY trial. METHODS: Early closure (8–13 days) of a temporary stoma was compared to late closure (> 12 weeks) in the randomized controlled trial EASY (NCT01287637). The study period and follow-up was 12 months after rectal resection. Inclusion of participants was made after index surgery. Exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus, steroid treatment, signs of postoperative complications or anastomotic leakage. Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the trial and unit costs from Swedish sources. Costs were calculated for the year 2016 and analysed from the perspective of the healthcare sector. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients underwent early closure, and 57 late closure in eight Swedish and Danish hospitals between 2011 and 2014. The difference in mean cost per patient was 4060 US dollar (95% confidence interval 1121; 6999, p value < 0.01) in favour of early closure. A sensitivity analysis, taking protocol-driven examinations into account, resulted in an overall difference in mean cost per patient of $3608, in favour of early closure (95% confidence interval 668; 6549, p value 0.02). The predominant cost factors were reoperations, readmissions and endoscopic examinations. CONCLUSIONS: The significant cost reduction in this study, together with results of safety and efficacy from the randomized controlled trial, supports the routine use of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer in selected patients without signs of anastomotic leakage. CLINICAL TRIAL: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov, clinical trials identifier NCT01287637. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6946724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69467242020-01-21 Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial) Park, Jennifer Angenete, Eva Bock, David Correa-Marinez, Adiela Danielsen, Anne K. Gehrman, Jacob Haglind, Eva Jansen, Jens E. Skullman, Stefan Wedin, Anette Rosenberg, Jacob Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Hospital costs associated with the treatment of rectal cancer are considerable and the formation of a temporary stoma accounts for additional costs. Results from the EASY trial showed that early closure of a temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications but no difference in health-related quality of life up to 12 months after rectal resection. The aim of the present study was to perform a cost analysis within the framework of the EASY trial. METHODS: Early closure (8–13 days) of a temporary stoma was compared to late closure (> 12 weeks) in the randomized controlled trial EASY (NCT01287637). The study period and follow-up was 12 months after rectal resection. Inclusion of participants was made after index surgery. Exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus, steroid treatment, signs of postoperative complications or anastomotic leakage. Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the trial and unit costs from Swedish sources. Costs were calculated for the year 2016 and analysed from the perspective of the healthcare sector. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients underwent early closure, and 57 late closure in eight Swedish and Danish hospitals between 2011 and 2014. The difference in mean cost per patient was 4060 US dollar (95% confidence interval 1121; 6999, p value < 0.01) in favour of early closure. A sensitivity analysis, taking protocol-driven examinations into account, resulted in an overall difference in mean cost per patient of $3608, in favour of early closure (95% confidence interval 668; 6549, p value 0.02). The predominant cost factors were reoperations, readmissions and endoscopic examinations. CONCLUSIONS: The significant cost reduction in this study, together with results of safety and efficacy from the randomized controlled trial, supports the routine use of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer in selected patients without signs of anastomotic leakage. CLINICAL TRIAL: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov, clinical trials identifier NCT01287637. Springer US 2019-03-25 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6946724/ /pubmed/30911920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06732-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Park, Jennifer Angenete, Eva Bock, David Correa-Marinez, Adiela Danielsen, Anne K. Gehrman, Jacob Haglind, Eva Jansen, Jens E. Skullman, Stefan Wedin, Anette Rosenberg, Jacob Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial) |
title | Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial) |
title_full | Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial) |
title_fullStr | Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial) |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial) |
title_short | Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial) |
title_sort | cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (easy trial) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30911920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06732-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkjennifer costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial AT angeneteeva costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial AT bockdavid costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial AT correamarinezadiela costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial AT danielsenannek costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial AT gehrmanjacob costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial AT haglindeva costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial AT jansenjense costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial AT skullmanstefan costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial AT wedinanette costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial AT rosenbergjacob costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial |