Cargando…

Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)

BACKGROUND: Hospital costs associated with the treatment of rectal cancer are considerable and the formation of a temporary stoma accounts for additional costs. Results from the EASY trial showed that early closure of a temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer postoperative compli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jennifer, Angenete, Eva, Bock, David, Correa-Marinez, Adiela, Danielsen, Anne K., Gehrman, Jacob, Haglind, Eva, Jansen, Jens E., Skullman, Stefan, Wedin, Anette, Rosenberg, Jacob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30911920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06732-y
_version_ 1783485422362427392
author Park, Jennifer
Angenete, Eva
Bock, David
Correa-Marinez, Adiela
Danielsen, Anne K.
Gehrman, Jacob
Haglind, Eva
Jansen, Jens E.
Skullman, Stefan
Wedin, Anette
Rosenberg, Jacob
author_facet Park, Jennifer
Angenete, Eva
Bock, David
Correa-Marinez, Adiela
Danielsen, Anne K.
Gehrman, Jacob
Haglind, Eva
Jansen, Jens E.
Skullman, Stefan
Wedin, Anette
Rosenberg, Jacob
author_sort Park, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital costs associated with the treatment of rectal cancer are considerable and the formation of a temporary stoma accounts for additional costs. Results from the EASY trial showed that early closure of a temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications but no difference in health-related quality of life up to 12 months after rectal resection. The aim of the present study was to perform a cost analysis within the framework of the EASY trial. METHODS: Early closure (8–13 days) of a temporary stoma was compared to late closure (> 12 weeks) in the randomized controlled trial EASY (NCT01287637). The study period and follow-up was 12 months after rectal resection. Inclusion of participants was made after index surgery. Exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus, steroid treatment, signs of postoperative complications or anastomotic leakage. Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the trial and unit costs from Swedish sources. Costs were calculated for the year 2016 and analysed from the perspective of the healthcare sector. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients underwent early closure, and 57 late closure in eight Swedish and Danish hospitals between 2011 and 2014. The difference in mean cost per patient was 4060 US dollar (95% confidence interval 1121; 6999, p value < 0.01) in favour of early closure. A sensitivity analysis, taking protocol-driven examinations into account, resulted in an overall difference in mean cost per patient of $3608, in favour of early closure (95% confidence interval 668; 6549, p value 0.02). The predominant cost factors were reoperations, readmissions and endoscopic examinations. CONCLUSIONS: The significant cost reduction in this study, together with results of safety and efficacy from the randomized controlled trial, supports the routine use of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer in selected patients without signs of anastomotic leakage. CLINICAL TRIAL: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov, clinical trials identifier NCT01287637.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6946724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69467242020-01-21 Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial) Park, Jennifer Angenete, Eva Bock, David Correa-Marinez, Adiela Danielsen, Anne K. Gehrman, Jacob Haglind, Eva Jansen, Jens E. Skullman, Stefan Wedin, Anette Rosenberg, Jacob Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Hospital costs associated with the treatment of rectal cancer are considerable and the formation of a temporary stoma accounts for additional costs. Results from the EASY trial showed that early closure of a temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications but no difference in health-related quality of life up to 12 months after rectal resection. The aim of the present study was to perform a cost analysis within the framework of the EASY trial. METHODS: Early closure (8–13 days) of a temporary stoma was compared to late closure (> 12 weeks) in the randomized controlled trial EASY (NCT01287637). The study period and follow-up was 12 months after rectal resection. Inclusion of participants was made after index surgery. Exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus, steroid treatment, signs of postoperative complications or anastomotic leakage. Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the trial and unit costs from Swedish sources. Costs were calculated for the year 2016 and analysed from the perspective of the healthcare sector. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients underwent early closure, and 57 late closure in eight Swedish and Danish hospitals between 2011 and 2014. The difference in mean cost per patient was 4060 US dollar (95% confidence interval 1121; 6999, p value < 0.01) in favour of early closure. A sensitivity analysis, taking protocol-driven examinations into account, resulted in an overall difference in mean cost per patient of $3608, in favour of early closure (95% confidence interval 668; 6549, p value 0.02). The predominant cost factors were reoperations, readmissions and endoscopic examinations. CONCLUSIONS: The significant cost reduction in this study, together with results of safety and efficacy from the randomized controlled trial, supports the routine use of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer in selected patients without signs of anastomotic leakage. CLINICAL TRIAL: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov, clinical trials identifier NCT01287637. Springer US 2019-03-25 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6946724/ /pubmed/30911920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06732-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Park, Jennifer
Angenete, Eva
Bock, David
Correa-Marinez, Adiela
Danielsen, Anne K.
Gehrman, Jacob
Haglind, Eva
Jansen, Jens E.
Skullman, Stefan
Wedin, Anette
Rosenberg, Jacob
Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)
title Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)
title_full Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)
title_fullStr Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)
title_full_unstemmed Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)
title_short Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)
title_sort cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (easy trial)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30911920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06732-y
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjennifer costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial
AT angeneteeva costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial
AT bockdavid costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial
AT correamarinezadiela costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial
AT danielsenannek costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial
AT gehrmanjacob costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial
AT haglindeva costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial
AT jansenjense costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial
AT skullmanstefan costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial
AT wedinanette costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial
AT rosenbergjacob costanalysisinarandomizedtrialofearlyclosureofatemporaryileostomyafterrectalresectionforcancereasytrial