Cargando…
Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic incisional ventral hernia repair (LIVHR) is often followed by seroma formation, bulging and failure to restore abdominal wall function. These outcomes are risk factors for hernia recurrence, chronic pain and poor quality of life (QoL). We aimed to evaluate whether LIVHR combine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30941550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06735-9 |
_version_ | 1783485429646884864 |
---|---|
author | Ahonen-Siirtola, Mirella Nevala, Terhi Vironen, Jaana Kössi, Jyrki Pinta, Tarja Niemeläinen, Susanna Keränen, Ulla Ward, Jaana Vento, Pälvi Karvonen, Jukka Ohtonen, Pasi Mäkelä, Jyrki Rautio, Tero |
author_facet | Ahonen-Siirtola, Mirella Nevala, Terhi Vironen, Jaana Kössi, Jyrki Pinta, Tarja Niemeläinen, Susanna Keränen, Ulla Ward, Jaana Vento, Pälvi Karvonen, Jukka Ohtonen, Pasi Mäkelä, Jyrki Rautio, Tero |
author_sort | Ahonen-Siirtola, Mirella |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Laparoscopic incisional ventral hernia repair (LIVHR) is often followed by seroma formation, bulging and failure to restore abdominal wall function. These outcomes are risk factors for hernia recurrence, chronic pain and poor quality of life (QoL). We aimed to evaluate whether LIVHR combined with defect closure (hybrid) follows as a diminished seroma formation and thereby has a lower rate of hernia recurrence and chronic pain compared to standard LIVHR. METHODS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. From November 2012 to May 2015, 193 patients undergoing LIVHR for primary incisional hernia with fascial defect size from 2 to 7 cm were recruited in 11 Finnish hospitals. Patients were randomised to either a laparoscopic (LG) or a hybrid (HG) repair group. The main outcome measure was hernia recurrence, evaluated clinically and radiologically at a 1-year follow-up visit. At the same time, chronic pain scores and QoL were also measured. RESULTS: At the 1-year-control visit, we found no difference in hernia recurrence between the study groups. Altogether, 11 recurrent hernias were found in ultrasound examination, producing a recurrence rate of 6.4%. Of these recurrences, 6 (6.7%) were in the LG group and 5 (6.1%) were in the HG group (p > 0.90). The visual analogue scores for pain were low in both groups; the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) was 1.5 in LG and 1.4 in HG (p = 0.50). QoL improved significantly comparing preoperative status to 1 year after operation in both groups since the bodily pain score increased by 7.8 points (p < 0.001) and physical functioning by 4.3 points (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up is needed to demonstrate the potential advantage of a hybrid operation with fascial defect closure. Both techniques had low hernia recurrence rates 1 year after operation. LIVHR reduces chronic pain and physical impairment and improves QoL. Trial Registry: Clinical trial number NCT02542085. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6946755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69467552020-01-21 Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results Ahonen-Siirtola, Mirella Nevala, Terhi Vironen, Jaana Kössi, Jyrki Pinta, Tarja Niemeläinen, Susanna Keränen, Ulla Ward, Jaana Vento, Pälvi Karvonen, Jukka Ohtonen, Pasi Mäkelä, Jyrki Rautio, Tero Surg Endosc Article PURPOSE: Laparoscopic incisional ventral hernia repair (LIVHR) is often followed by seroma formation, bulging and failure to restore abdominal wall function. These outcomes are risk factors for hernia recurrence, chronic pain and poor quality of life (QoL). We aimed to evaluate whether LIVHR combined with defect closure (hybrid) follows as a diminished seroma formation and thereby has a lower rate of hernia recurrence and chronic pain compared to standard LIVHR. METHODS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. From November 2012 to May 2015, 193 patients undergoing LIVHR for primary incisional hernia with fascial defect size from 2 to 7 cm were recruited in 11 Finnish hospitals. Patients were randomised to either a laparoscopic (LG) or a hybrid (HG) repair group. The main outcome measure was hernia recurrence, evaluated clinically and radiologically at a 1-year follow-up visit. At the same time, chronic pain scores and QoL were also measured. RESULTS: At the 1-year-control visit, we found no difference in hernia recurrence between the study groups. Altogether, 11 recurrent hernias were found in ultrasound examination, producing a recurrence rate of 6.4%. Of these recurrences, 6 (6.7%) were in the LG group and 5 (6.1%) were in the HG group (p > 0.90). The visual analogue scores for pain were low in both groups; the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) was 1.5 in LG and 1.4 in HG (p = 0.50). QoL improved significantly comparing preoperative status to 1 year after operation in both groups since the bodily pain score increased by 7.8 points (p < 0.001) and physical functioning by 4.3 points (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up is needed to demonstrate the potential advantage of a hybrid operation with fascial defect closure. Both techniques had low hernia recurrence rates 1 year after operation. LIVHR reduces chronic pain and physical impairment and improves QoL. Trial Registry: Clinical trial number NCT02542085. Springer US 2019-04-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6946755/ /pubmed/30941550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06735-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Ahonen-Siirtola, Mirella Nevala, Terhi Vironen, Jaana Kössi, Jyrki Pinta, Tarja Niemeläinen, Susanna Keränen, Ulla Ward, Jaana Vento, Pälvi Karvonen, Jukka Ohtonen, Pasi Mäkelä, Jyrki Rautio, Tero Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results |
title | Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results |
title_full | Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results |
title_short | Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results |
title_sort | laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30941550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06735-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahonensiirtolamirella laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT nevalaterhi laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT vironenjaana laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT kossijyrki laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT pintatarja laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT niemelainensusanna laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT keranenulla laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT wardjaana laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT ventopalvi laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT karvonenjukka laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT ohtonenpasi laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT makelajyrki laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults AT rautiotero laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults |