Cargando…

Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic incisional ventral hernia repair (LIVHR) is often followed by seroma formation, bulging and failure to restore abdominal wall function. These outcomes are risk factors for hernia recurrence, chronic pain and poor quality of life (QoL). We aimed to evaluate whether LIVHR combine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahonen-Siirtola, Mirella, Nevala, Terhi, Vironen, Jaana, Kössi, Jyrki, Pinta, Tarja, Niemeläinen, Susanna, Keränen, Ulla, Ward, Jaana, Vento, Pälvi, Karvonen, Jukka, Ohtonen, Pasi, Mäkelä, Jyrki, Rautio, Tero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30941550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06735-9
_version_ 1783485429646884864
author Ahonen-Siirtola, Mirella
Nevala, Terhi
Vironen, Jaana
Kössi, Jyrki
Pinta, Tarja
Niemeläinen, Susanna
Keränen, Ulla
Ward, Jaana
Vento, Pälvi
Karvonen, Jukka
Ohtonen, Pasi
Mäkelä, Jyrki
Rautio, Tero
author_facet Ahonen-Siirtola, Mirella
Nevala, Terhi
Vironen, Jaana
Kössi, Jyrki
Pinta, Tarja
Niemeläinen, Susanna
Keränen, Ulla
Ward, Jaana
Vento, Pälvi
Karvonen, Jukka
Ohtonen, Pasi
Mäkelä, Jyrki
Rautio, Tero
author_sort Ahonen-Siirtola, Mirella
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Laparoscopic incisional ventral hernia repair (LIVHR) is often followed by seroma formation, bulging and failure to restore abdominal wall function. These outcomes are risk factors for hernia recurrence, chronic pain and poor quality of life (QoL). We aimed to evaluate whether LIVHR combined with defect closure (hybrid) follows as a diminished seroma formation and thereby has a lower rate of hernia recurrence and chronic pain compared to standard LIVHR. METHODS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. From November 2012 to May 2015, 193 patients undergoing LIVHR for primary incisional hernia with fascial defect size from 2 to 7 cm were recruited in 11 Finnish hospitals. Patients were randomised to either a laparoscopic (LG) or a hybrid (HG) repair group. The main outcome measure was hernia recurrence, evaluated clinically and radiologically at a 1-year follow-up visit. At the same time, chronic pain scores and QoL were also measured. RESULTS: At the 1-year-control visit, we found no difference in hernia recurrence between the study groups. Altogether, 11 recurrent hernias were found in ultrasound examination, producing a recurrence rate of 6.4%. Of these recurrences, 6 (6.7%) were in the LG group and 5 (6.1%) were in the HG group (p > 0.90). The visual analogue scores for pain were low in both groups; the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) was 1.5 in LG and 1.4 in HG (p = 0.50). QoL improved significantly comparing preoperative status to 1 year after operation in both groups since the bodily pain score increased by 7.8 points (p < 0.001) and physical functioning by 4.3 points (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up is needed to demonstrate the potential advantage of a hybrid operation with fascial defect closure. Both techniques had low hernia recurrence rates 1 year after operation. LIVHR reduces chronic pain and physical impairment and improves QoL. Trial Registry: Clinical trial number NCT02542085.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6946755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69467552020-01-21 Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results Ahonen-Siirtola, Mirella Nevala, Terhi Vironen, Jaana Kössi, Jyrki Pinta, Tarja Niemeläinen, Susanna Keränen, Ulla Ward, Jaana Vento, Pälvi Karvonen, Jukka Ohtonen, Pasi Mäkelä, Jyrki Rautio, Tero Surg Endosc Article PURPOSE: Laparoscopic incisional ventral hernia repair (LIVHR) is often followed by seroma formation, bulging and failure to restore abdominal wall function. These outcomes are risk factors for hernia recurrence, chronic pain and poor quality of life (QoL). We aimed to evaluate whether LIVHR combined with defect closure (hybrid) follows as a diminished seroma formation and thereby has a lower rate of hernia recurrence and chronic pain compared to standard LIVHR. METHODS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. From November 2012 to May 2015, 193 patients undergoing LIVHR for primary incisional hernia with fascial defect size from 2 to 7 cm were recruited in 11 Finnish hospitals. Patients were randomised to either a laparoscopic (LG) or a hybrid (HG) repair group. The main outcome measure was hernia recurrence, evaluated clinically and radiologically at a 1-year follow-up visit. At the same time, chronic pain scores and QoL were also measured. RESULTS: At the 1-year-control visit, we found no difference in hernia recurrence between the study groups. Altogether, 11 recurrent hernias were found in ultrasound examination, producing a recurrence rate of 6.4%. Of these recurrences, 6 (6.7%) were in the LG group and 5 (6.1%) were in the HG group (p > 0.90). The visual analogue scores for pain were low in both groups; the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) was 1.5 in LG and 1.4 in HG (p = 0.50). QoL improved significantly comparing preoperative status to 1 year after operation in both groups since the bodily pain score increased by 7.8 points (p < 0.001) and physical functioning by 4.3 points (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up is needed to demonstrate the potential advantage of a hybrid operation with fascial defect closure. Both techniques had low hernia recurrence rates 1 year after operation. LIVHR reduces chronic pain and physical impairment and improves QoL. Trial Registry: Clinical trial number NCT02542085. Springer US 2019-04-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6946755/ /pubmed/30941550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06735-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Ahonen-Siirtola, Mirella
Nevala, Terhi
Vironen, Jaana
Kössi, Jyrki
Pinta, Tarja
Niemeläinen, Susanna
Keränen, Ulla
Ward, Jaana
Vento, Pälvi
Karvonen, Jukka
Ohtonen, Pasi
Mäkelä, Jyrki
Rautio, Tero
Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results
title Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results
title_full Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results
title_fullStr Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results
title_short Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results
title_sort laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30941550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06735-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ahonensiirtolamirella laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT nevalaterhi laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT vironenjaana laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT kossijyrki laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT pintatarja laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT niemelainensusanna laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT keranenulla laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT wardjaana laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT ventopalvi laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT karvonenjukka laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT ohtonenpasi laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT makelajyrki laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults
AT rautiotero laparoscopicversushybridapproachfortreatmentofincisionalventralherniaaprospectiverandomisedmulticentrestudy1yearresults