Cargando…

Cemented versus uncemented hip implant fixation: Should there be age thresholds?

There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konan, Sujith, Abdel, Matthew P., Haddad, Fares S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.812.BJR-2019-0337
Descripción
Sumario:There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusively on the chronological age of the patient. This editorial focuses on the literature-based arguments to support the use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), while addressing potential concerns surrounding safety and cost-effectiveness. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(12):604–607.