Cargando…
Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
INTRODUCTION: The multiple mini-interview (MMI) model can be useful to evaluate non-cognitive domains and guide the selection process in medical residency programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and acceptability of the MMI model for the selection of residents in a cardiology...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039270 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2019.83903.1116 |
_version_ | 1783485455298199552 |
---|---|
author | BURGOS, LUCRECIA M. DE LIMA, ALBERTO ALVES PARODI, JOSEFINA COSTABEL, JUAN PABLO GANIELE, MARÍA NIEVES DURANTE, EDUARDO ARCEO, MARÍA DOLORES GELPI, RICARDO |
author_facet | BURGOS, LUCRECIA M. DE LIMA, ALBERTO ALVES PARODI, JOSEFINA COSTABEL, JUAN PABLO GANIELE, MARÍA NIEVES DURANTE, EDUARDO ARCEO, MARÍA DOLORES GELPI, RICARDO |
author_sort | BURGOS, LUCRECIA M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The multiple mini-interview (MMI) model can be useful to evaluate non-cognitive domains and guide the selection process in medical residency programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and acceptability of the MMI model for the selection of residents in a cardiology residency program METHODS: We conducted an observational and prospective study. It was performed in a tertiary-care center specialized in cardiology and included candidates for the cardiology residency program in March 2018. Ten stations were developed to evaluate different non-cognitive domains. Reliability was evaluated by the generalizability G coefficient. Candidates and interviewers were surveyed to evaluate the acceptability of the MMI model. RESULTS: Nine faculty members were trained and 22 candidates were evaluated. The G study showed a relative G coefficient between 0.56 and 0.73, according to the design. 91% of the candidates stated that they preferred MMI over other types of interviews as a selection method for admission to the residency program, and all the interviewers considered they had enough time to evaluate the candidates and their strengths as future residents CONCLUSION: The MMI is a reliable model to evaluate candidates for a residency program in cardiology with high acceptability among residents and observers |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6946944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Shiraz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69469442020-02-07 Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology BURGOS, LUCRECIA M. DE LIMA, ALBERTO ALVES PARODI, JOSEFINA COSTABEL, JUAN PABLO GANIELE, MARÍA NIEVES DURANTE, EDUARDO ARCEO, MARÍA DOLORES GELPI, RICARDO J Adv Med Educ Prof Original Article INTRODUCTION: The multiple mini-interview (MMI) model can be useful to evaluate non-cognitive domains and guide the selection process in medical residency programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and acceptability of the MMI model for the selection of residents in a cardiology residency program METHODS: We conducted an observational and prospective study. It was performed in a tertiary-care center specialized in cardiology and included candidates for the cardiology residency program in March 2018. Ten stations were developed to evaluate different non-cognitive domains. Reliability was evaluated by the generalizability G coefficient. Candidates and interviewers were surveyed to evaluate the acceptability of the MMI model. RESULTS: Nine faculty members were trained and 22 candidates were evaluated. The G study showed a relative G coefficient between 0.56 and 0.73, according to the design. 91% of the candidates stated that they preferred MMI over other types of interviews as a selection method for admission to the residency program, and all the interviewers considered they had enough time to evaluate the candidates and their strengths as future residents CONCLUSION: The MMI is a reliable model to evaluate candidates for a residency program in cardiology with high acceptability among residents and observers Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6946944/ /pubmed/32039270 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2019.83903.1116 Text en Copyright: © Shiraz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article BURGOS, LUCRECIA M. DE LIMA, ALBERTO ALVES PARODI, JOSEFINA COSTABEL, JUAN PABLO GANIELE, MARÍA NIEVES DURANTE, EDUARDO ARCEO, MARÍA DOLORES GELPI, RICARDO Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology |
title | Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology |
title_full | Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology |
title_fullStr | Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology |
title_short | Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology |
title_sort | reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039270 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2019.83903.1116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burgoslucreciam reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology AT delimaalbertoalves reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology AT parodijosefina reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology AT costabeljuanpablo reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology AT ganielemarianieves reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology AT duranteeduardo reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology AT arceomariadolores reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology AT gelpiricardo reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology |