Cargando…

Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology

INTRODUCTION: The multiple mini-interview (MMI) model can be useful to evaluate non-cognitive domains and guide the selection process in medical residency programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and acceptability of the MMI model for the selection of residents in a cardiology...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: BURGOS, LUCRECIA M., DE LIMA, ALBERTO ALVES, PARODI, JOSEFINA, COSTABEL, JUAN PABLO, GANIELE, MARÍA NIEVES, DURANTE, EDUARDO, ARCEO, MARÍA DOLORES, GELPI, RICARDO
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039270
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2019.83903.1116
_version_ 1783485455298199552
author BURGOS, LUCRECIA M.
DE LIMA, ALBERTO ALVES
PARODI, JOSEFINA
COSTABEL, JUAN PABLO
GANIELE, MARÍA NIEVES
DURANTE, EDUARDO
ARCEO, MARÍA DOLORES
GELPI, RICARDO
author_facet BURGOS, LUCRECIA M.
DE LIMA, ALBERTO ALVES
PARODI, JOSEFINA
COSTABEL, JUAN PABLO
GANIELE, MARÍA NIEVES
DURANTE, EDUARDO
ARCEO, MARÍA DOLORES
GELPI, RICARDO
author_sort BURGOS, LUCRECIA M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The multiple mini-interview (MMI) model can be useful to evaluate non-cognitive domains and guide the selection process in medical residency programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and acceptability of the MMI model for the selection of residents in a cardiology residency program METHODS: We conducted an observational and prospective study. It was performed in a tertiary-care center specialized in cardiology and included candidates for the cardiology residency program in March 2018. Ten stations were developed to evaluate different non-cognitive domains. Reliability was evaluated by the generalizability G coefficient. Candidates and interviewers were surveyed to evaluate the acceptability of the MMI model. RESULTS: Nine faculty members were trained and 22 candidates were evaluated. The G study showed a relative G coefficient between 0.56 and 0.73, according to the design. 91% of the candidates stated that they preferred MMI over other types of interviews as a selection method for admission to the residency program, and all the interviewers considered they had enough time to evaluate the candidates and their strengths as future residents CONCLUSION: The MMI is a reliable model to evaluate candidates for a residency program in cardiology with high acceptability among residents and observers
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6946944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69469442020-02-07 Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology BURGOS, LUCRECIA M. DE LIMA, ALBERTO ALVES PARODI, JOSEFINA COSTABEL, JUAN PABLO GANIELE, MARÍA NIEVES DURANTE, EDUARDO ARCEO, MARÍA DOLORES GELPI, RICARDO J Adv Med Educ Prof Original Article INTRODUCTION: The multiple mini-interview (MMI) model can be useful to evaluate non-cognitive domains and guide the selection process in medical residency programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and acceptability of the MMI model for the selection of residents in a cardiology residency program METHODS: We conducted an observational and prospective study. It was performed in a tertiary-care center specialized in cardiology and included candidates for the cardiology residency program in March 2018. Ten stations were developed to evaluate different non-cognitive domains. Reliability was evaluated by the generalizability G coefficient. Candidates and interviewers were surveyed to evaluate the acceptability of the MMI model. RESULTS: Nine faculty members were trained and 22 candidates were evaluated. The G study showed a relative G coefficient between 0.56 and 0.73, according to the design. 91% of the candidates stated that they preferred MMI over other types of interviews as a selection method for admission to the residency program, and all the interviewers considered they had enough time to evaluate the candidates and their strengths as future residents CONCLUSION: The MMI is a reliable model to evaluate candidates for a residency program in cardiology with high acceptability among residents and observers Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6946944/ /pubmed/32039270 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2019.83903.1116 Text en Copyright: © Shiraz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
BURGOS, LUCRECIA M.
DE LIMA, ALBERTO ALVES
PARODI, JOSEFINA
COSTABEL, JUAN PABLO
GANIELE, MARÍA NIEVES
DURANTE, EDUARDO
ARCEO, MARÍA DOLORES
GELPI, RICARDO
Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
title Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
title_full Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
title_fullStr Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
title_short Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
title_sort reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039270
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2019.83903.1116
work_keys_str_mv AT burgoslucreciam reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology
AT delimaalbertoalves reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology
AT parodijosefina reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology
AT costabeljuanpablo reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology
AT ganielemarianieves reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology
AT duranteeduardo reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology
AT arceomariadolores reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology
AT gelpiricardo reliabilityandacceptabilityofthemultipleminiinterviewforselectionofresidentsincardiology