Cargando…

Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies

In this study, the authors present a comparative analysis of different additive manufacturing (AM) technologies for high-performance components. Four 3D printers, currently available on the Italian national manufacturing market and belonging to three different AM technologies, were considered. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tagliaferri, Vincenzo, Trovalusci, Federica, Guarino, Stefano, Venettacci, Simone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835783
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244161
_version_ 1783485484878528512
author Tagliaferri, Vincenzo
Trovalusci, Federica
Guarino, Stefano
Venettacci, Simone
author_facet Tagliaferri, Vincenzo
Trovalusci, Federica
Guarino, Stefano
Venettacci, Simone
author_sort Tagliaferri, Vincenzo
collection PubMed
description In this study, the authors present a comparative analysis of different additive manufacturing (AM) technologies for high-performance components. Four 3D printers, currently available on the Italian national manufacturing market and belonging to three different AM technologies, were considered. The analysis focused on technical aspects to highlight the characteristics and performance limits of each technology, economic aspects to allow for an assessment of the costs associated with the different processes, and environmental aspects to focus on the impact of the production cycles associated with these technologies on the ecosystem, resources and human health. This study highlighted the current limits of additive manufacturing technologies in terms of production capacity in the case of large-scale production of plastic components, especially large ones. At the same time, this study highlights how the geometry of the object to be developed greatly influences the optimal choice between the various AM technologies, in both technological and economic terms. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is the technology that exhibits the greatest limitations hindering mass production due to production times and costs, but also due to the associated environmental impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6947159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69471592020-01-13 Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies Tagliaferri, Vincenzo Trovalusci, Federica Guarino, Stefano Venettacci, Simone Materials (Basel) Article In this study, the authors present a comparative analysis of different additive manufacturing (AM) technologies for high-performance components. Four 3D printers, currently available on the Italian national manufacturing market and belonging to three different AM technologies, were considered. The analysis focused on technical aspects to highlight the characteristics and performance limits of each technology, economic aspects to allow for an assessment of the costs associated with the different processes, and environmental aspects to focus on the impact of the production cycles associated with these technologies on the ecosystem, resources and human health. This study highlighted the current limits of additive manufacturing technologies in terms of production capacity in the case of large-scale production of plastic components, especially large ones. At the same time, this study highlights how the geometry of the object to be developed greatly influences the optimal choice between the various AM technologies, in both technological and economic terms. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is the technology that exhibits the greatest limitations hindering mass production due to production times and costs, but also due to the associated environmental impact. MDPI 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6947159/ /pubmed/31835783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244161 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tagliaferri, Vincenzo
Trovalusci, Federica
Guarino, Stefano
Venettacci, Simone
Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies
title Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies
title_full Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies
title_fullStr Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies
title_full_unstemmed Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies
title_short Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies
title_sort environmental and economic analysis of fdm, sls and mjf additive manufacturing technologies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835783
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244161
work_keys_str_mv AT tagliaferrivincenzo environmentalandeconomicanalysisoffdmslsandmjfadditivemanufacturingtechnologies
AT trovaluscifederica environmentalandeconomicanalysisoffdmslsandmjfadditivemanufacturingtechnologies
AT guarinostefano environmentalandeconomicanalysisoffdmslsandmjfadditivemanufacturingtechnologies
AT venettaccisimone environmentalandeconomicanalysisoffdmslsandmjfadditivemanufacturingtechnologies