Cargando…
Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies
In this study, the authors present a comparative analysis of different additive manufacturing (AM) technologies for high-performance components. Four 3D printers, currently available on the Italian national manufacturing market and belonging to three different AM technologies, were considered. The a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244161 |
_version_ | 1783485484878528512 |
---|---|
author | Tagliaferri, Vincenzo Trovalusci, Federica Guarino, Stefano Venettacci, Simone |
author_facet | Tagliaferri, Vincenzo Trovalusci, Federica Guarino, Stefano Venettacci, Simone |
author_sort | Tagliaferri, Vincenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, the authors present a comparative analysis of different additive manufacturing (AM) technologies for high-performance components. Four 3D printers, currently available on the Italian national manufacturing market and belonging to three different AM technologies, were considered. The analysis focused on technical aspects to highlight the characteristics and performance limits of each technology, economic aspects to allow for an assessment of the costs associated with the different processes, and environmental aspects to focus on the impact of the production cycles associated with these technologies on the ecosystem, resources and human health. This study highlighted the current limits of additive manufacturing technologies in terms of production capacity in the case of large-scale production of plastic components, especially large ones. At the same time, this study highlights how the geometry of the object to be developed greatly influences the optimal choice between the various AM technologies, in both technological and economic terms. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is the technology that exhibits the greatest limitations hindering mass production due to production times and costs, but also due to the associated environmental impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6947159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69471592020-01-13 Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies Tagliaferri, Vincenzo Trovalusci, Federica Guarino, Stefano Venettacci, Simone Materials (Basel) Article In this study, the authors present a comparative analysis of different additive manufacturing (AM) technologies for high-performance components. Four 3D printers, currently available on the Italian national manufacturing market and belonging to three different AM technologies, were considered. The analysis focused on technical aspects to highlight the characteristics and performance limits of each technology, economic aspects to allow for an assessment of the costs associated with the different processes, and environmental aspects to focus on the impact of the production cycles associated with these technologies on the ecosystem, resources and human health. This study highlighted the current limits of additive manufacturing technologies in terms of production capacity in the case of large-scale production of plastic components, especially large ones. At the same time, this study highlights how the geometry of the object to be developed greatly influences the optimal choice between the various AM technologies, in both technological and economic terms. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is the technology that exhibits the greatest limitations hindering mass production due to production times and costs, but also due to the associated environmental impact. MDPI 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6947159/ /pubmed/31835783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244161 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tagliaferri, Vincenzo Trovalusci, Federica Guarino, Stefano Venettacci, Simone Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies |
title | Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies |
title_full | Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies |
title_fullStr | Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies |
title_full_unstemmed | Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies |
title_short | Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies |
title_sort | environmental and economic analysis of fdm, sls and mjf additive manufacturing technologies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tagliaferrivincenzo environmentalandeconomicanalysisoffdmslsandmjfadditivemanufacturingtechnologies AT trovaluscifederica environmentalandeconomicanalysisoffdmslsandmjfadditivemanufacturingtechnologies AT guarinostefano environmentalandeconomicanalysisoffdmslsandmjfadditivemanufacturingtechnologies AT venettaccisimone environmentalandeconomicanalysisoffdmslsandmjfadditivemanufacturingtechnologies |